| Literature DB >> 25274875 |
George E Hardart1, Wendy K Chung2.
Abstract
Two recent policy statements, one from the American Academy of Pediatrics and one from the American College of Medical Genetics, reach very different conclusions about the question of whether children should be tested for adult-onset genetic conditions. The American Academy of Pediatrics policy begins with the presumption that genetic testing for children should be driven by the best interest of the child. It recognizes the importance of preserving the child's open future, recommending that genetic testing for adult-onset diseases be deferred. The American College of Medical Genetics, by contrast, recommended testing children for at least some adult conditions, although it should be noted they have recently modified this recommendation. They justified this recommendation by arguing that it, in fact, was in the best interests of the child and family to receive this information. In this article, we analyze these 2 different positions and suggest ways that the seeming conflicts between them might be reconciled.Entities:
Keywords: best interests; ethics; genetics; legal issues; newborns
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25274875 PMCID: PMC4258839 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-1394F
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatrics ISSN: 0031-4005 Impact factor: 7.124