Literature DB >> 25274875

Genetic testing of children for diseases that have onset in adulthood: the limits of family interests.

George E Hardart1, Wendy K Chung2.   

Abstract

Two recent policy statements, one from the American Academy of Pediatrics and one from the American College of Medical Genetics, reach very different conclusions about the question of whether children should be tested for adult-onset genetic conditions. The American Academy of Pediatrics policy begins with the presumption that genetic testing for children should be driven by the best interest of the child. It recognizes the importance of preserving the child's open future, recommending that genetic testing for adult-onset diseases be deferred. The American College of Medical Genetics, by contrast, recommended testing children for at least some adult conditions, although it should be noted they have recently modified this recommendation. They justified this recommendation by arguing that it, in fact, was in the best interests of the child and family to receive this information. In this article, we analyze these 2 different positions and suggest ways that the seeming conflicts between them might be reconciled.
Copyright © 2014 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  best interests; ethics; genetics; legal issues; newborns

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25274875      PMCID: PMC4258839          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-1394F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  21 in total

1.  Glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes: family predictors and mediators.

Authors:  Danny C Duke; Gary R Geffken; Adam B Lewin; Laura B Williams; Eric A Storch; Janet H Silverstein
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-02-23

Review 2.  The best interests standard for incompetent or incapacitated persons of all ages.

Authors:  Loretta M Kopelman
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Mandatory extended searches in all genome sequencing: "incidental findings," patient autonomy, and shared decision making.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Mark A Rothstein; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The problem of proxies with interests of their own: toward a better theory of proxy decisions.

Authors:  J Hardwig
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1993

Review 5.  Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention.

Authors:  Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2004

6.  Using the Best Interests Standard to decide whether to test children for untreatable, late-onset genetic diseases.

Authors:  Loretta M Kopelman
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

7.  Attitudes and preferences of intensivists regarding the role of family interests in medical decision making for incompetent patients.

Authors:  George E Hardart; Robert D Truog
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Family functioning and children's academic performance and behavior problems in the year following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  J B Rivara; K M Jaffe; N L Polissar; G C Fay; K M Martin; H A Shurtleff; S Liao
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Steven Joffe; Barbara A Koenig; Barbara B Biesecker; Laurence B McCullough; Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby; Timothy Caulfield; Sharon F Terry; Robert C Green
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  ACMG recommendations on incidental findings are flawed scientifically and ethically.

Authors:  Neil A Holtzman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  10 in total

1.  Is There Ever a Role for the Unilateral Do Not Attempt Resuscitation Order in Pediatric Care?

Authors:  Jonathan M Marron; Emma Jones; Joanne Wolfe
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Psychosocial Adjustment and Perceived Risk Among Adolescent Girls From Families With BRCA1/2 or Breast Cancer History.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa A Schwartz; Brian L Egleston; Dare Henry-Moss; Susan M Domchek; Mary B Daly; Lisa Tuchman; Cynthia Moore; Paula K Rauch; Rebecca Shorter; Kelsey Karpink; Colleen Burke Sands
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Les tests et le dépistage génétiques chez les enfants.

Authors:  Aideen M Moore; Julie Richer
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.600

Review 4.  Genetic testing and screening in children.

Authors:  Aideen M Moore; Julie Richer
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.600

5.  Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Lindsay Bailey; Kara Fultz; Audrey Fan; Janet L Williams; Adam Buchanan; F Daniel Davis; Michael F Murray; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 6.  Genomic Testing in The Paediatric Population: Ethical Considerations in Light of Recent Policy Statements.

Authors:  Ainsley J Newson; Lisa Schonstein
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Attitudes toward the right to autonomous decision-making in psychiatric genetic testing: Controversial and context-dependent.

Authors:  Jana Strohmaier; Stephanie H Witt; Josef Frank; Noemi Lemme; Laura Flatau; Fabian Streit; Jerome C Foo; Markus Reitt; Dan Rujescu; Thomas G Schulze; Dirk Lanzerath; Franciska Illes; Franziska Degenhardt; Marcella Rietschel
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.568

8.  The Moral Foundations of Child Health and Social Policies: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis.

Authors:  Avram E Denburg; Mita Giacomini; Wendy J Ungar; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-13

9.  Parental Access to Children's Raw Genomic Data in Canada: Legal Rights and Professional Responsibility.

Authors:  Michael J S Beauvais; Adrian M Thorogood; Michael J Szego; Karine Sénécal; M'an H Zawati; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  What does the best interests principle of the convention on the rights of the child mean for paediatric healthcare?

Authors:  Julian W März
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.860

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.