Literature DB >> 24008255

ACMG recommendations on incidental findings are flawed scientifically and ethically.

Neil A Holtzman.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 24008255     DOI： 10.1038/gim.2013.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN： 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


× No keyword cloud information.
  28 in total

1.  Practical guidance on informed consent for pediatric participants in a biorepository.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; John A Lynch; Sharon A Aufox; John J Connolly; Bruce D Gelb; Ingrid A Holm; Saskia C Sanderson; Jennifer B McCormick; Janet L Williams; Wendy A Wolf; Armand H M Antommaria; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Michael J Bamshad; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 3.  Next generation sequencing and the future of genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Katja Lohmann; Christine Klein
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Clinical tumor sequencing: an incidental casualty of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommendations for reporting of incidental findings.

Authors:  D Williams Parsons; Angshumoy Roy; Sharon E Plon; Sameek Roychowdhury; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Genetic testing of children for diseases that have onset in adulthood: the limits of family interests.

Authors:  George E Hardart; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Use of contemporary genetics in cardiovascular diagnosis.

Authors:  Alfred L George
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.

Authors:  Gail P Jarvik; Laura M Amendola; Jonathan S Berg; Kyle Brothers; Ellen W Clayton; Wendy Chung; Barbara J Evans; James P Evans; Stephanie M Fullerton; Carlos J Gallego; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Stacy W Gray; Ingrid A Holm; Iftikhar J Kullo; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Cathy McCarty; Cynthia A Prows; Heidi L Rehm; Richard R Sharp; Joseph Salama; Saskia Sanderson; Sara L Van Driest; Marc S Williams; Susan M Wolf; Wendy A Wolf; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Good laboratory practice for clinical next-generation sequencing informatics pipelines.

Authors:  Amy S Gargis; Lisa Kalman; David P Bick; Cristina da Silva; David P Dimmock; Birgit H Funke; Sivakumar Gowrisankar; Madhuri R Hegde; Shashikant Kulkarni; Christopher E Mason; Rakesh Nagarajan; Karl V Voelkerding; Elizabeth A Worthey; Nazneen Aziz; John Barnes; Sarah F Bennett; Himani Bisht; Deanna M Church; Zoya Dimitrova; Shaw R Gargis; Nabil Hafez; Tina Hambuch; Fiona C L Hyland; Ruth Ann Luna; Duncan MacCannell; Tobias Mann; Megan R McCluskey; Timothy K McDaniel; Lilia M Ganova-Raeva; Heidi L Rehm; Jeffrey Reid; David S Campo; Richard B Resnick; Perry G Ridge; Marc L Salit; Pavel Skums; Lee-Jun C Wong; Barbara A Zehnbauer; Justin M Zook; Ira M Lubin
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Erik Parens; Cameron R Waldman; Robert Klitzman; Abby Fyer; Josue Martinez; W Nicholson Price; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.683

Review 10.  Genetic testing in the epilepsies-developments and dilemmas.

Authors:  Annapurna Poduri; Beth Rosen Sheidley; Sara Shostak; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 42.937
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.