Literature DB >> 25274226

How do the residual fragments after SWL affect the health-related quality of life? A critical analysis in a size-based manner.

Cahit Sahin1, Alper Kafkasli, Cihangir A Cetinel, Fehmi Narter, Erkin Saglam, Kemal Sarica.   

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the possible effects of residual fragments (RF) after shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) on the health-related quality of life (QOL) of the patients on a size-related basis. Eighty six patients with RF after SWL were divided into three groups: Group 1 (n:30 with fragments ≤ 2 mm), Group 2 (n:21 2-≤ 4 mm) and Group 3 (n:35 > 4 mm). During a 3-month follow-up, spontaneous passage rates, emergency department visits, mean analgesic required, additional procedures and the QOL were all evaluated. QOL was evaluated using the Short Form-36 survey. Of the 30 patients with fragments ≤ 2 mm all cases passed the fragments spontaneously. Of the 21 cases with fragments 2-≤ 4, however, 76% were stone free. Last, of the 35 cases with fragments >4 mm, 52% passed them spontaneously in 3 months. While no patient with fragments ≤ 2 mm required emergency department visit, 19% of the cases with fragments 2-≤ 4 mm and 51.4 % with fragments >4 mm did require this visit. Mean analgesic need (mg) values were higher in cases with larger fragments. Evaluation of the QOL score data in a subgroup comparison base showed that cases with larger fragments had prominently lower scores during both 1- and 3-month evaluation. RF after SWL could pose an impact on the QOL of the cases in a size-related basis. While fragments ≤ 2 mm had nearly no impact on this aspect larger fragments could significantly affect the QOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25274226     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-014-0727-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  25 in total

Review 1.  Acute relief or future prevention: is urology ready for preventive health care?

Authors:  C G Roehrborn
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis.

Authors:  Margaret S Pearle; Elizabeth A Calhoun; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Alexandra E Perks; Trevor D Schuler; Jason Lee; Daniela Ghiculete; Dae-Gyun Chung; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Which efficiency index for urinary stones treatment?

Authors:  Gauthier Raynal; Jacques Petit; Fabien Saint
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-06-10

5.  A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.

Authors:  Idir Ouzaid; Said Al-qahtani; Sébastien Dominique; Vincent Hupertan; Pédro Fernandez; Jean-François Hermieu; Vincent Delmas; Vincent Ravery
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994.

Authors:  Kiriaki K Stamatelou; Mildred E Francis; Camille A Jones; Leroy M Nyberg; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Fate of clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with EDAP LT-01 lithotripter.

Authors:  Y T Moon; S C Kim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 8.  Epidemiology and medical management of stone disease.

Authors:  H-G Tiselius
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Patients' quality of life following extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi.

Authors:  N B Mays; A Petruckevitch; C Snowdon
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project.

Authors:  Jordi Alonso; Montserrat Ferrer; Barbara Gandek; John E Ware; Neil K Aaronson; Paola Mosconi; Niels K Rasmussen; Monika Bullinger; Shunichi Fukuhara; Stein Kaasa; Alain Leplège
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  2 in total

1.  Using a three-dimensional computer assisted stone volume estimates to evaluate extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of kidney stones.

Authors:  Lene Hyldgaard Bigum; Peter Sommer Ulriksen; Omar Salah Omar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy laser lithotripsy for treatment of urinary stones smaller than 2 cm: a cost-utility analysis in the Spanish clinical setting.

Authors:  Gema Romeu; Leopoldo José Marzullo-Zucchet; Javier Díaz; Sara Villarroya; Alberto Budía; Domingo de Guzmán Ordaz; Vicent Caballer; David Vivas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.