Literature DB >> 25274063

Generation of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene-targeted pigs via somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Xiaoqing Zhou1, Jige Xin, Nana Fan, Qingjian Zou, Jiao Huang, Zhen Ouyang, Yu Zhao, Bentian Zhao, Zhaoming Liu, Sisi Lai, Xiaoling Yi, Lin Guo, Miguel A Esteban, Yangzhi Zeng, Huaqiang Yang, Liangxue Lai.   

Abstract

The domestic pig has been widely used as an important large animal model. Precise and efficient genetic modification in pig provides a great promise in biomedical research. Recently, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) system has been successfully used to produce many gene-targeted animals. However, these animals have been generated by co-injection of Cas9 mRNA and single-guide RNA (sgRNA) into one-cell stage embryos, which mostly resulted in mosaicism of the modification. One or two rounds of further breeding should be performed to obtain homozygotes with identical genotype and phenotype. To address this issue, gene-targeted somatic cells can be used as donor for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) to produce gene-targeted animals with single and identical mutations. In this study, we applied Cas9/sgRNAs to effectively direct gene editing in porcine fetal fibroblasts and then mutant cell colonies were used as donor to generate homozygous gene-targeted pigs through single round of SCNT. As a result, we successfully obtained 15 tyrosinase (TYR) biallelic mutant pigs and 20 PARK2 and PINK1 double-gene knockout (KO) pigs. They were all homozygous and no off-target mutagenesis was detected by comprehensive analysis. TYR (-/-) pigs showed typical albinism and the expression of parkin and PINK1 were depleted in PARK2 (-/-)/PINK1 (-/-) pigs. The results demonstrated that single- or double-gene targeted pigs can be effectively achieved by using the CRISPR/Cas9 system combined with SCNT without mosaic mutation and detectable off-target effects. This gene-editing system provides an efficient, rapid, and less costly manner to generate genetically modified pigs or other large animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25274063     DOI: 10.1007/s00018-014-1744-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


  25 in total

1.  Simultaneous generation and germline transmission of multiple gene mutations in rat using CRISPR-Cas systems.

Authors:  Wei Li; Fei Teng; Tianda Li; Qi Zhou
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Generating rats with conditional alleles using CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Yuanwu Ma; Xu Zhang; Bin Shen; Yingdong Lu; Wei Chen; Jing Ma; Lin Bai; Xingxu Huang; Lianfeng Zhang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 25.617

3.  Generation of PPARγ mono-allelic knockout pigs via zinc-finger nucleases and nuclear transfer cloning.

Authors:  Dongshan Yang; Huaqiang Yang; Wei Li; Bentian Zhao; Zhen Ouyang; Zhaoming Liu; Yu Zhao; Nana Fan; Jun Song; Jiangtian Tian; Feng Li; Jifeng Zhang; Lin Chang; Duanqing Pei; Y Eugene Chen; Liangxue Lai
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 25.617

4.  Multiple genome modifications by the CRISPR/Cas9 system in zebrafish.

Authors:  Satoshi Ota; Yu Hisano; Yoshiya Ikawa; Atsuo Kawahara
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Efficient nonmeiotic allele introgression in livestock using custom endonucleases.

Authors:  Wenfang Tan; Daniel F Carlson; Cheryl A Lancto; John R Garbe; Dennis A Webster; Perry B Hackett; Scott C Fahrenkrug
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Molecular basis of albinism: mutations and polymorphisms of pigmentation genes associated with albinism.

Authors:  W S Oetting; R A King
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases.

Authors:  Patrick D Hsu; David A Scott; Joshua A Weinstein; F Ann Ran; Silvana Konermann; Vineeta Agarwala; Yinqing Li; Eli J Fine; Xuebing Wu; Ophir Shalem; Thomas J Cradick; Luciano A Marraffini; Gang Bao; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering.

Authors:  Haoyi Wang; Hui Yang; Chikdu S Shivalila; Meelad M Dawlaty; Albert W Cheng; Feng Zhang; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Highly efficient generation of GGTA1 biallelic knockout inbred mini-pigs with TALENs.

Authors:  Jige Xin; Huaqiang Yang; Nana Fan; Bentian Zhao; Zhen Ouyang; Zhaoming Liu; Yu Zhao; Xiaoping Li; Jun Song; Yi Yang; Qingjian Zou; Quanmei Yan; Yangzhi Zeng; Liangxue Lai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity.

Authors:  Vikram Pattanayak; Steven Lin; John P Guilinger; Enbo Ma; Jennifer A Doudna; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  94 in total

Review 1.  Genetically engineered livestock for biomedical models.

Authors:  Christopher S Rogers
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Evaluation of human and non-human primate antibody binding to pig cells lacking GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2 genes.

Authors:  Jose L Estrada; Greg Martens; Ping Li; Andrew Adams; Kenneth A Newell; Mandy L Ford; James R Butler; Richard Sidner; Matt Tector; Joseph Tector
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 3.  Quantitative Rodent Brain Receptor Imaging.

Authors:  Kristina Herfert; Julia G Mannheim; Laura Kuebler; Sabina Marciano; Mario Amend; Christoph Parl; Hanna Napieczynska; Florian M Maier; Salvador Castaneda Vega; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Efficient generation of GHR knockout Bama minipig fibroblast cells using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Jian-Ying Zhang; Ke-Huan Lu; Sheng-Sheng Lu; Xiang-Xing Zhu
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 5.  Genome editing and genetic engineering in livestock for advancing agricultural and biomedical applications.

Authors:  Bhanu P Telugu; Ki-Eun Park; Chi-Hun Park
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 6.  What rheumatologists need to know about CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Gary J Gibson; Maozhou Yang
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 7.  Exogenous enzymes upgrade transgenesis and genetic engineering of farm animals.

Authors:  Pablo Bosch; Diego O Forcato; Fabrisio E Alustiza; Ana P Alessio; Alejandro E Fili; María F Olmos Nicotra; Ana C Liaudat; Nancy Rodríguez; Thirumala R Talluri; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Enhanced genome editing in mammalian cells with a modified dual-fluorescent surrogate system.

Authors:  Yan Zhou; Yong Liu; Dianna Hussmann; Peter Brøgger; Rasha Abdelkadhem Al-Saaidi; Shuang Tan; Lin Lin; Trine Skov Petersen; Guang Qian Zhou; Peter Bross; Lars Aagaard; Tino Klein; Sif Groth Rønn; Henrik Duelund Pedersen; Lars Bolund; Anders Lade Nielsen; Charlotte Brandt Sørensen; Yonglun Luo
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 9.  Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Reprogramming: Mechanisms and Applications.

Authors:  Shogo Matoba; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  TALEN-mediated gene targeting in porcine spermatogonia.

Authors:  Lin Tang; Alla Bondareva; Raquel González; Jose R Rodriguez-Sosa; Daniel F Carlson; Dennis Webster; Scott Fahrenkrug; Ina Dobrinski
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.