Literature DB >> 25273923

Walking without optic flow reduces subsequent vection.

Takeharu Seno1, Stephen Palmisano, Bernhard E Riecke, Shinji Nakamura.   

Abstract

This experiment investigated the effect of walking without optic flow on subsequent vection induction and strength. Two groups of participants walked for 5 min (either wearing Ganzfeld goggles or with normal vision) prior to exposure to a vection-inducing stimulus. We then measured the onset latency and strength of vection induced by a radially expanding pattern of optic flow. The results showed that walking without optic flow transiently yielded later vection onsets and reduced vection strength. We propose that walking without optic flow triggered a sensory readjustment, which reduced the ability of optic flow to induce self-motion perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25273923     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4109-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Rollvection versus linearvection: comparison of brain activations in PET.

Authors:  Angela Deutschländer; Sandra Bense; Thomas Stephan; Markus Schwaiger; Marianne Dieterich; Thomas Brandt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Consistent air flow to the face facilitates vection.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Masaki Ogawa; Hiroyuki Ito; Shoji Sunaga
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Natural visual-field features enhance vection.

Authors:  Andrea Bubka; Frederick Bonato
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Effects of active and passive viewpoint jitter on vection in depth.

Authors:  Juno Kim; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Visually mediated eye movements regulate the capture of optic flow in self-motion perception.

Authors:  Juno Kim; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex.

Authors:  T Brandt; P Bartenstein; A Janek; M Dieterich
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Display lag and gain effects on vection experienced by active observers.

Authors:  April Ash; Stephen Palmisano; Donovan G Govan; Juno Kim
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2011-08

8.  Inconsistent locomotion inhibits vection.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Hiroyuki Ito; Shoji Sunaga
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Stimulus meanings alter illusory self-motion (vection)--experimental examination of the train illusion.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Haruaki Fukuda
Journal:  Seeing Perceiving       Date:  2012

10.  Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization.

Authors:  J J Rieser; H L Pick; D H Ashmead; A E Garing
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  7 in total

1.  Material surface properties modulate vection strength.

Authors:  Yuki Morimoto; Hirotaro Sato; Chihiro Hiramatsu; Takeharu Seno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Smoothness of stimulus motion can affect vection strength.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Fujii; Takeharu Seno; Robert S Allison
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Evidence against an ecological explanation of the jitter advantage for vection.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Robert S Allison; April Ash; Shinji Nakamura; Deborah Apthorp
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-11

4.  The Oscillating Potential Model of Visually Induced Vection.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Ken-Ichi Sawai; Hidetoshi Kanaya; Toshihiro Wakebe; Masaki Ogawa; Yoshitaka Fujii; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-24

5.  The search for instantaneous vection: An oscillating visual prime reduces vection onset latency.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Bernhard E Riecke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  When gravity is not where it should be: How perceived orientation affects visual self-motion processing.

Authors:  Meaghan McManus; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A high-density EEG study of differences between three high speeds of simulated forward motion from optic flow in adult participants.

Authors:  Kenneth Vilhelmsen; F R Ruud van der Weel; Audrey L H van der Meer
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.