Literature DB >> 20153359

How equitable are colorectal cancer screening programs which include FOBTs? A review of qualitative and quantitative studies.

Sara Javanparast1, Paul Ward, Graeme Young, Carlene Wilson, Stacy Carter, Gary Misan, Stephen Cole, Moyez Jiwa, George Tsourtos, Angelita Martini, Tiffany Gill, Genevieve Baratiny, Michelle Ah Matt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review published literature on the equity of participation in colorectal cancer screening amongst different population subgroups, in addition to identifying factors identified as barriers and facilitators to equitable screening. Studies were included in the review if they included FOBT as at least one of the screening tests.
METHOD: Relevant published articles were identified through systematic electronic searches of selected databases and the examination of the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Studies of the association with colorectal cancer screening test participation, barriers to equitable participation in screening, and studies examining interventional actions to facilitate screening test participation were included. Data extraction and analysis was undertaken using an approach to the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies called Realist Review.
RESULTS: Sixty-three articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria. SES status, ethnicity, age and gender have been found as predictors of colorectal cancer screening test participation. This review also found that the potential for equitable cancer screening test participation may be hindered by access barriers which vary amongst population sub-groups.
CONCLUSION: This review provides evidence of horizontal inequity in colorectal cancer screening test participation, but limited understanding of the mechanism by which it is sustained, and few evidence-based solutions. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20153359     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  17 in total

1.  Effects of an entertaining, culturally targeted narrative and an appealing expert interview on the colorectal screening intentions of African American women.

Authors:  May G Kennedy; Donna McClish; Resa M Jones; Yan Jin; Diane B Wilson; Diane L Bishop
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2018-04-27

2.  Capsule Commentary on Berkowitz et al., Building Equity Improvement into Quality Improvement: Reducing Socioeconomic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening as Part of Population Health Management.

Authors:  Ravikumar Paluri
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Institutional (mis)trust in colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study with Greek, Iranian, Anglo-Australian and Indigenous groups.

Authors:  Paul R Ward; Cushla Coffey; Sara Javanparast; Carlene Wilson; Samantha B Meyer
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Screening practices of Australian men and women categorized as "at or slightly above average risk" of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Trevor Lockett; Alex Boussioutas; Louise Keogh; Louisa B Flander; Ingrid Winship; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Attitudes and beliefs of non-participants in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicola J Hall; Greg P Rubin; Christina Dobson; David Weller; Jane Wardle; Mary Ritchie; Colin J Rees
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.

Authors:  Martin O'Flaherty; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Simon Capewell; Angela Boland; Michelle Maden; Brendan Collins; Piotr Bandosz; Lirije Hyseni; Chris Kypridemos
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Social inequalities in a population based colorectal cancer screening programme in the Basque Country.

Authors:  Jose Luis Hurtado; Amaia Bacigalupe; Montse Calvo; Santi Esnaola; Nere Mendizabal; Isabel Portillo; Isabel Idigoras; Eduardo Millán; Eunate Arana-Arri
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of risk.

Authors:  Ryan J Courtney; Christine L Paul; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Finlay A Macrae; Mariko L Carey; John Attia; Mark McEvoy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Gender differences in attitudes impeding colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Paul Ritvo; Ronald E Myers; Lawrence Paszat; Mardie Serenity; Daniel F Perez; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ryan J Courtney; Christine L Paul; Mariko L Carey; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Finlay A Macrae; Catherine D'Este; David Hill; Daniel Barker; Jody Simmons
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.