Peter L C Lapner1, Liangfu Jiang, Tinghua Zhang, George S Athwal. 1. Division of Orthopedics, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, W1648, Box 502, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada, plapner@toh.on.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Shoulder arthroplasty provides reliable pain relief and restoration of function. However, the effects of fatty infiltration and atrophy in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles on functional outcomes are not well understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to (1) compare preoperative with postoperative fatty infiltration and atrophy of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles after primary shoulder arthroplasty; and (2) identify any associations between these variables and outcome measures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 62 patients with a mean age of 67 years (range, 34-90 years) who underwent shoulder arthroplasty. CT scans were conducted preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Outcome variables included the degree of supraspinatus and infraspinatus fatty infiltration (percent fatty infiltration and Goutallier grade), muscle area (percent muscle area and Warner atrophy grade), shoulder strength, and the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Constant outcome score. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the mean percent fatty infiltration (FI) within the supraspinatus and infraspinatus was identical at 14%. One year after shoulder arthroplasty, both muscles had less fatty infiltration (6% and 7%, respectively; p<0.001). Similarly, the Goutallier grade significantly improved postoperatively for the supraspinatus (p=0.0037) and infraspinatus (p=0.0007). Conversely, measures of muscle atrophy remained unchanged postoperatively (p>0.251). Preoperatively, greater supraspinatus percent FI was negatively associated with preoperative shoulder strength (r=0.37, p=0.001) and Constant score (r=0.38, p=0.001). Postoperative infraspinatus percent FI was negatively associated with postoperative strength (r=0.3, p=0.021) and Constant score (r=0.3, p=0.04). Multivariable regression analysis of possible predictive factors demonstrated that preoperative supraspinatus percent muscle area (p=0.016) and the diagnosis of osteoarthritis (p=0.017) were associated with better followup WOOS scores, and preoperative supraspinatus strength was associated with postoperative strength (p=0.0024). Higher degrees of preoperative percent FI were not associated with worse patient-reported outcomes postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Supraspinatus and infraspinatus fatty infiltration improves after shoulder arthroplasty, whereas muscle area remains unchanged. Although further study of these variables is required, the negative associations identified between preoperative supraspinatus atrophy and the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and postoperative quality-of-life outcome scores may aid the clinician in selecting the best treatment option for glenohumeral arthrosis and in the management of patient expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.
BACKGROUND: Shoulder arthroplasty provides reliable pain relief and restoration of function. However, the effects of fatty infiltration and atrophy in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles on functional outcomes are not well understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to (1) compare preoperative with postoperative fatty infiltration and atrophy of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles after primary shoulder arthroplasty; and (2) identify any associations between these variables and outcome measures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 62 patients with a mean age of 67 years (range, 34-90 years) who underwent shoulder arthroplasty. CT scans were conducted preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Outcome variables included the degree of supraspinatus and infraspinatus fatty infiltration (percent fatty infiltration and Goutallier grade), muscle area (percent muscle area and Warner atrophy grade), shoulder strength, and the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Constant outcome score. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the mean percent fatty infiltration (FI) within the supraspinatus and infraspinatus was identical at 14%. One year after shoulder arthroplasty, both muscles had less fatty infiltration (6% and 7%, respectively; p<0.001). Similarly, the Goutallier grade significantly improved postoperatively for the supraspinatus (p=0.0037) and infraspinatus (p=0.0007). Conversely, measures of muscle atrophy remained unchanged postoperatively (p>0.251). Preoperatively, greater supraspinatus percent FI was negatively associated with preoperative shoulder strength (r=0.37, p=0.001) and Constant score (r=0.38, p=0.001). Postoperative infraspinatus percent FI was negatively associated with postoperative strength (r=0.3, p=0.021) and Constant score (r=0.3, p=0.04). Multivariable regression analysis of possible predictive factors demonstrated that preoperative supraspinatus percent muscle area (p=0.016) and the diagnosis of osteoarthritis (p=0.017) were associated with better followup WOOS scores, and preoperative supraspinatus strength was associated with postoperative strength (p=0.0024). Higher degrees of preoperative percent FI were not associated with worse patient-reported outcomes postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Supraspinatus and infraspinatus fatty infiltration improves after shoulder arthroplasty, whereas muscle area remains unchanged. Although further study of these variables is required, the negative associations identified between preoperative supraspinatus atrophy and the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and postoperative quality-of-life outcome scores may aid the clinician in selecting the best treatment option for glenohumeral arthrosis and in the management of patient expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.
Authors: Suk-Kee Tae; Joo Han Oh; Sae Hoon Kim; Seok Won Chung; Jin Young Yang; Young Woong Back Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Peter L C Lapner; Elham Sabri; Kawan Rakhra; Kimberly Bell; George S Athwal Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Peter N Chalmers; Lindsay Beck; Matthew Miller; Irene Stertz; Heath B Henninger; Robert Z Tashjian Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Heath B Henninger; Garrett V Christensen; Carolyn E Taylor; Jun Kawakami; Bradley S Hillyard; Robert Z Tashjian; Peter N Chalmers Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Dillon C O'Neill; Garrett V Christensen; Bradley Hillyard; Jun Kawakami; Robert Z Tashjian; Peter N Chalmers Journal: JSES Int Date: 2020-12-11
Authors: Paul B McLendon; Kaitlyn N Christmas; Peter Simon; Otho R Plummer; Audrey Hunt; Adil S Ahmed; Mark A Mighell; Mark A Frankle Journal: JB JS Open Access Date: 2021-03-26
Authors: Robert Z Tashjian; Bradley Hillyard; Victoria Childress; Jun Kawakami; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Peter N Chalmers Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 3.019