Literature DB >> 25266941

Low-frequency pitch perception in children with cochlear implants in comparison to normal hearing peers.

Hilal Dincer D'Alessandro1, Roberto Filipo2, Deborah Ballantyne2, Giuseppe Attanasio2, Ersilia Bosco2, Maria Nicastri2, Patrizia Mancini2.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the application of two new pitch perception tests in children with cochlear implants (CI) and to compare CI outcomes to normal hearing (NH) children, as well as investigating the effect of chronological age on performance. The tests were believed to be linked to the availability of Temporal Fine Structure (TFS) cues. 20 profoundly deaf children with CI (5-17 years) and 31 NH peers participated in the study. Harmonic Intonation (HI) and Disharmonic Intonation (DI) tests were used to measure low-frequency pitch perception. HI/DI outcomes were found poorer in children with CI. CI and NH groups showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). HI scores were better than those of DI test (p < 0.001). Chronological age had a significant effect on DI performance in NH group (p < 0.05); children under the age of 8.5 years showed larger inter-subject-variability; however, the majority of NH children showed outcomes that were considered normal at adult-level. For the DI test, bimodal listeners had better performance than when listening with CI alone. HI/DI tests were applicable as clinical tools in the pediatric population. The majority of CI users showed abnormal outcomes on both tests confirming poor TFS processing in the hearing-impaired population. Findings indicated that the DI test provided more differential low-frequency pitch perception outcomes in that it reflected phase locking and TFS processing capacities of the ear, whereas HI test provided information of its place coding capacity as well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Cochlear implants; Pitch perception; Temporal Fine Structure

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25266941     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3313-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  27 in total

1.  Cochlear implants in special cases: deafness in the presence of disabilities and/or associated problems.

Authors:  R Filipo; E Bosco; P Mancini; D Ballantyne
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  2004-05

2.  Development of the A§E test battery for assessment of pitch perception in speech.

Authors:  Willemijn Heeren; Martine Coene; Bart Vaerenberg; Andrei Avram; Anna Cardinaletti; Luca del Bo; Alexandru Pascu; Francesca Volpato; Paul J Govaerts
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2012-03-08

3.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Sensitivity of psychophysical measures to signal processor modifications in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Kaibao Nie; Elyse Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  A comparison of the speech recognition and pitch ranking abilities of children using a unilateral cochlear implant, bimodal stimulation or bilateral hearing aids.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Christopher John Radford
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 6.  Cochlear implants: current designs and future possibilities.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

Review 7.  Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Analysis of spiral ganglion cell populations in children with normal and pathological ears.

Authors:  Makoto Miura; Isamu Sando; Barry E Hirsch; Yorihisa Orita
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Music Perception of Cochlear Implant Recipients with Implications for Music Instruction: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Feilin Hsiao; Kate Gfeller
Journal:  Update Univ S C Dep Music       Date:  2012-02-16

10.  The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.

Authors:  Esra Yucel; Gonca Sennaroglu; Erol Belgin
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 1.675

View more
  3 in total

1.  Perception of lexical stress cued by low-frequency pitch and insights into speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users and normal hearing adults.

Authors:  Hilal Dincer D'Alessandro; Patrizia Mancini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Developing an Ear Prosthesis Fabricated in Polyvinylidene Fluoride by a 3D Printer with Sensory Intrinsic Properties of Pressure and Temperature.

Authors:  Ernesto Suaste-Gómez; Grissel Rodríguez-Roldán; Héctor Reyes-Cruz; Omar Terán-Jiménez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Binaural squelch and head shadow effects in children with unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids.

Authors:  H Dincer D'Alessandro; G Sennaroğlu; E Yücel; E Belgin; P Mancini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.124

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.