Literature DB >> 12498365

Analysis of spiral ganglion cell populations in children with normal and pathological ears.

Makoto Miura1, Isamu Sando, Barry E Hirsch, Yorihisa Orita.   

Abstract

This study analyzed features of total and segmental spiral ganglion cell populations in children with normal ears and those with various pathological conditions. Sixty-three human temporal bone specimens, obtained from 43 children 4 days to 9 years of age, were studied histopathologically. These specimens were divided into 5 diagnostic groups: group 1, normal ears (13 ears); group 2, congenital infectious diseases (13 ears); group 3, chromosomal aberrations (11 ears); group 4, multiple craniofacial anomalies with hereditary or genetic causes (21 ears); and group 5, perinatal and postnatal asphyxia (5 ears). Eighteen of the 63 ears had documented profound deafness. In either normal ears (group 1) or those with various pathological conditions (groups 2 through 5), the total number of ganglion cells did not change as a function of age during the first 10 years. The total number of ganglion cells was significantly larger in group 1 (33,702) than in each of groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 (p < .01), and the number was significantly larger in group 2 than in each of groups 4 and 5 (p < .01 and p < .05, respectively). The ratio of basal to apical ganglion cell populations remained constant in both normal and pathological ears. Each ratio of the number of basal and apical ganglion cells in groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 to the mean number in group 1 (basal and apical survival ratios) was at least approximately 40%. There was no statistical difference between these two ratios in groups 2, 3, 4, and 5. The mean (+/-SD) total number of ganglion cells in ears with documented profound deafness was 15,417 +/- 5,944, which is approximately 40% of those present in normal ears. Our results suggest that normally, cochlear neurons are completely present at birth and minimally regress during the first decade of life. In addition, although intergroup differences among various pathological groups were present, the majority of pathological ears had more than 10,000 spiral ganglion cells present. Cochlear implantation has gradually been recognized as an effective and reliable tool for rehabilitation of children who have profound deafness, even congenitally or prelingually deafened children. On the basis of the results obtained in this study, we discuss the implications for cochlear implantation in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12498365     DOI: 10.1177/000348940211101201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  14 in total

1.  Chronic neurotrophin delivery promotes ectopic neurite growth from the spiral ganglion of deafened cochleae without compromising the spatial selectivity of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Thomas G Landry; James B Fallon; Andrew K Wise; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Cochlear neuropathy in human presbycusis: Confocal analysis of hidden hearing loss in post-mortem tissue.

Authors:  Lucas M Viana; Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Dianne D Jones; Carlos A C P Oliveira; Felipe Santos; Saumil N Merchant; Leslie D Liberman; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Low-frequency pitch perception in children with cochlear implants in comparison to normal hearing peers.

Authors:  Hilal Dincer D'Alessandro; Roberto Filipo; Deborah Ballantyne; Giuseppe Attanasio; Ersilia Bosco; Maria Nicastri; Patrizia Mancini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Spiral ganglion neuron survival and function in the deafened cochlea following chronic neurotrophic treatment.

Authors:  Thomas G Landry; Andrew K Wise; James B Fallon; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Age-related primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Chadi A Makary; Jennifer Shin; Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-07-12

6.  Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Literature Review on the Distribution of Spiral Ganglion Cell Bodies inside the Human Cochlear Central Modiolar Trunk.

Authors:  Anandhan Dhanasingh; Claude N Jolly; Gunesh Rajan; Paul van de Heyning
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.017

8.  Stochastic undersampling steepens auditory threshold/duration functions: implications for understanding auditory deafferentation and aging.

Authors:  Frédéric Marmel; Medardo A Rodríguez-Mendoza; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Vowel and consonant confusions from spectrally manipulated stimuli designed to simulate poor cochlear implant electrode-neuron interfaces.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Richard A Wright; Matthew B Winn; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Evaluation of the Relationship between the NRT-Ratio, Cochlear Anatomy, and Insertions Depth of Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes.

Authors:  Philipp Mittmann; Grit Rademacher; Sven Mutze; Frederike Hassepass; Arneborg Ernst; Ingo Todt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.