H O Topçu1, S Cavkaytar2, K Kokanalı3, A I Guzel4, M Islimye5, M Doganay6. 1. Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: dronurtopcu@gmail.com. 2. Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: sabri.cavkaytar@gmail.com. 3. Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: kuntaykokanali@gmail.com. 4. Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: alijnk@hotmail.com. 5. Balıkesir University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Balıkesir, Turkey. Electronic address: minetaskin1302@yahoo.com.tr. 6. Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: mdmirmart@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of different intra-abdominal pressure values on visceral pain following gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, controlled prospective trial was conducted at a tertiary education hospital and included 150 patients who underwentgynecologic laparoscopy with different abdominal insufflation pressures. There were 54 patients in the 8 mmHg low pressure group (LPG), 45 in the 12 mmHg standard pressure group (SPG), and 51 in the 15 mmHg high pressure group (HPG). We assessed mean age, body mass index (BMI), duration of surgery, analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay, amount of CO2 expended and volume of hemorrhage. Visceral pain and referred visceral pain were assessed 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively using a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in age, BMI, analgesic consumption or length of hospital stay among groups. The mean operative time and total CO2 expended during surgery were higher in the LPG compared with the SPG and HPG. The mean intensity of postoperative pain assessed by the VAS score at 6 and 12 h was less in the LPG than in the SPG and HPG and was reduced significantly at 12 h. VAS scores at 24 h in the LPG and SPG were lower than in the HPG. CONCLUSION:Pain is reduced by low insufflation pressure compared with standard and high insufflation pressure following gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position. However, low insufflation pressure may result in longer operation times and increased hemorrhage.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of different intra-abdominal pressure values on visceral pain following gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, controlled prospective trial was conducted at a tertiary education hospital and included 150 patients who underwent gynecologic laparoscopy with different abdominal insufflation pressures. There were 54 patients in the 8 mmHg low pressure group (LPG), 45 in the 12 mmHg standard pressure group (SPG), and 51 in the 15 mmHg high pressure group (HPG). We assessed mean age, body mass index (BMI), duration of surgery, analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay, amount of CO2 expended and volume of hemorrhage. Visceral pain and referred visceral pain were assessed 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively using a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in age, BMI, analgesic consumption or length of hospital stay among groups. The mean operative time and total CO2 expended during surgery were higher in the LPG compared with the SPG and HPG. The mean intensity of postoperative pain assessed by the VAS score at 6 and 12 h was less in the LPG than in the SPG and HPG and was reduced significantly at 12 h. VAS scores at 24 h in the LPG and SPG were lower than in the HPG. CONCLUSION: Pain is reduced by low insufflation pressure compared with standard and high insufflation pressure following gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position. However, low insufflation pressure may result in longer operation times and increased hemorrhage.
Authors: Denise M D Özdemir-van Brunschot; Kees C J H M van Laarhoven; Gert-Jan Scheffer; Sjaak Pouwels; Kim E Wever; Michiel C Warlé Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-08-15 Impact factor: 4.584