Literature DB >> 36161507

AUGS-IUGA Joint clinical consensus statement on enhanced recovery after urogynecologic surgery.

.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) evidence-based protocols for perioperative care can lead to improvements in clinical outcomes and cost savings. This article aims to present consensus recommendations for the optimal perioperative management of patients undergoing urogynecological surgery.
METHODS: A review of meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, large nonrandomized studies, and review articles was conducted via PubMed and other databases for ERAS and urogynecological surgery. ERAS protocol components were established, and then quality of the evidence was both graded and used to form consensus recommendations for each topic. These recommendations were developed and endorsed by the writing group, which is comprised of the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association members.
RESULTS: All recommendations on ERAS protocol items are based on best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented accordingly. The components of ERAS with a high level of evidence to support their use include fasting for 6 h and taking clear fluids up to 2 h preoperatively, euvolemia, normothermia, surgical site preparation, antibiotic and antithrombotic prophylaxis, strong antiemetics and dexamethasone to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting, multimodal analgesia and restrictive use of opiates, use of chewing gum to reduce ileus, removal of catheter as soon as feasible after surgery and avoiding systematic use of drains/vaginal packs.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base and recommendations for a urogynecology-relevant ERAS perioperative care pathway are presented in this consensus review. There are several elements of ERAS with strong evidence of benefit in urogynecological surgery.
© 2022. The International Urogynecological Association and American Urogynecologic Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enhanced recovery; Urogynecological surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36161507     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05223-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   1.932


  59 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced recovery after surgery: A clinical review of implementation across multiple surgical subspecialties.

Authors:  Thomas W Smith; Xuanji Wang; Marc A Singer; Constantine V Godellas; Faaiza T Vaince
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection.

Authors:  S E Noblett; C P Snowden; B K Shenton; A F Horgan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

4.  Enhanced recovery program versus conventional care after colorectal surgery in the geriatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jarrod Kah Hwee Tan; Jia Jun Ang; Dedrick Kok Hong Chan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Do older patients (> 80 years) also benefit from ERAS after colorectal resection? A safety and feasibility study.

Authors:  Katrien Boon; Gabriele Bislenghi; André D'Hoore; Nele Boon; Albert M Wolthuis
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 6.  Preoperative Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Abdominal, Laparoscopic, and Vaginal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amy Arnold; Lucy P Aitchison; Jason Abbott
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Enhanced Recovery Implementation in Major Gynecologic Surgeries: Effect of Care Standardization.

Authors:  Susan C Modesitt; Bethany M Sarosiek; Elisa R Trowbridge; Dana L Redick; Puja M Shah; Robert H Thiele; Mohamed Tiouririne; Traci L Hedrick
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Pre-operative carbohydrate loading may be used in type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors:  U O Gustafsson; J Nygren; A Thorell; M Soop; P M Hellström; O Ljungqvist; E Hagström-Toft
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 2.105

9.  Randomized clinical trial of the effect of preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment on postoperative whole-body protein and glucose kinetics.

Authors:  M Svanfeldt; A Thorell; J Hausel; M Soop; O Rooyackers; J Nygren; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Effects of preoperative fasting abbreviation with carbohydrate and protein solution on postoperative symptoms of gynecological surgeries: double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Gisele Vissoci Marquini; Francisco Edes Silva Pinheiro; Alfredo Urbano Costa Vieira; Rogério Melo Costa Pinto; Maria Gabriela Baumgarten Kuster Uyeda; Manoel João Batista Castello Girão; Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori
Journal:  Rev Col Bras Cir       Date:  2020-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.