| Literature DB >> 25265411 |
Dylan Aïssi1, Jessica Dennis2, Martin Ladouceur3, Vinh Truong2, Nora Zwingerman2, Ares Rocanin-Arjo1, Marine Germain1, Tara A Paton4, Pierre-Emmanuel Morange5, France Gagnon2, David-Alexandre Trégouët1.
Abstract
In order to investigate whether DNA methylation marks could contribute to the incomplete penetrance of the FV Leiden mutation, a major genetic risk factor for venous thrombosis (VT), we measured genome-wide DNA methylation levels in peripheral blood samples of 98 VT patients carrying the mutation and 251 VT patients without the mutation using the dedicated Illumina HumanMethylation450 array. The genome-wide analysis of 388,120 CpG probes identified three sites mapping to the SLC19A2 locus whose DNA methylation levels differed significantly (p<3 10-8) between carriers and non-carriers. The three sites replicated (p<2 10-7) in an independent sample of 214 individuals from five large families ascertained on VT and FV Leiden mutation among which 53 were carriers and 161 were non-carriers of the mutation. In both studies, these three CpG sites were also associated (2.33 10-11<p<3.02 10-4) with biomarkers of the Protein C pathway known to be influenced by the FV Leiden mutation. A comprehensive linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis of the whole locus revealed that the original associations were due to LD between the FV Leiden mutation and a block of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) located in SLC19A2. After adjusting for this block of SNPs, the FV Leiden mutation was no longer associated with any CpG site (p>0.05). In conclusion, our work clearly illustrates some promises and pitfalls of DNA methylation investigations on peripheral blood DNA in large epidemiological cohorts. DNA methylation levels at SLC19A2 are influenced by SNPs in LD with FV Leiden, but these DNA methylation marks do not explain the incomplete penetrance of the FV Leiden mutation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25265411 PMCID: PMC4179266 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the studied populations.
| MARTHA | F5L-famiiles | |
| N = 349 | N = 214 | |
| Mean age in yrs ± SD | 43.8±14.1 | 39.6±16.7 |
| Males/Females | 75/274 | 101/113 |
| VT patients (%) | 349 (100%) | 11 (5.1%) |
| Heterozygote carriers of the | 98 | 53 |
| ACVn ratio | 0.89±0.38 | NA |
|
| 0.52±0.10 | NA |
| Non-carriers | 1.09±0.32 | NA |
| APCR ratio | NA | 2.56±0.67 |
|
| NA | 1.67±0.19 |
| Non-carriers | NA | 2.86±0.49 |
In MARTHA, ACVn ratio was significantly (p = 1.63 10−38) decreased in F5 rs6025 carriers compared to non-carriers.
In families, APCR ratio was significantly (p = 9.98 10−47) decreased in F5 rs6205 carriers compared to non-carriers.
Figure 1Manhattan plot of the MWAS results at 388,120 CpG sites.
Association(1) of SLC19A2CpG sites with rs6025 (FV Leiden mutation) in the discovery and replication studies.
| Discovery MARTHA study | Replication F5L-families study | |||||
| Non-Carriers (N = 251) | Carriers (N = 98) | Association Test p-value | Non-Carriers (N = 161) | Carriers (N = 53) | Association Test p-value | |
| cg16548605 | 0.93 (0.02) | 0.89 (0.03) | 1.90 10−29 | 0.93 (0.02) | 0.90 (0.03) | 6.58 10−14 |
| cg04083076 | 0.73 (0.06) | 0.64 (0.06) | 5.73 10−22 | 0.74 (0.06) | 0.67 (0.09) | 1.19 10−10 |
| cg09671955 | 0.53 (0.06) | 0.48 (0.07) | 3.49 10−12 | 0.55 (0.07) | 0.50 (0.07) | 5.62 10−7 |
Association is expressed as methylation β-value mean (SE) in carriers and non-carriers.
Reported p-values were those derived from a linear regression model where the probe methylation level was the outcome and the carrier status the covariate, while adjusting for age, sex, batch, chip and cell type composition.
Association(1) of SLC19A2 CpG sites with ACVn (MARTHA) and APCR (F5L-families) phenotypes.
| MARTHA study (N = 260) | F5L-families study (N = 208) | |||
| raw | Adjusted for rs6025 | raw | Adjusted for rs6025 | |
| cg16548605 | 46.9 (32.6–61.1) p = 8.14 10−10 | −1.2 (−14–11.7) p = 0.86 | 58.1 (44–72.1) p = 1.11 10−13 | 13.6 (3.1–24.1) p = 0.01 |
| cg04083076 | 18.1 (11.5–24.7) p = 2.12 10−7 | −3.1 (−8.8–2.50) p = 0.28 | 21.9 (15.1–28.7) p = 2.13 10−9 | 3.9 (−0.8–8.5) p = 0.10 |
| cg09671955 | 15.1 (7.4–22.9) p = 1.7 10−4 | −1.9 (−7.8–4.0) p = 0.53 | 14.4 (7.3–21.4) p = 1.02 10−4 | −1.3 (−4.6–4.1) p = 0.90 |
Association is expressed as % change in phenotype (95% Confidence Interval) for every 0.1 unit increase in methylation β-value.
Analysis were adjusted for age, sex, batch, chip and cell type composition.
Figure 2Region Association plot of the association between chromosome 1q23.3 SNPs and cg16548605 CpG site variability in the MARTHA study.
Association of rs970740 with SLC19A2 cg1658605, cg0483076 and cg09671955 levels.
| MARTHA | F5L-families study | |||||||
| TT (N = 232) | TC (N = 114) | CC (N = 3) | P value | TT (N = 140) | TC (N = 68) | CC (N = 3) | P value | |
| cg16548605 | 0.935 (0.010) | 0.889 (0.027) | 0.797 (0.045) | 1.66×10−66 | 0.930 (0.010) | 0.900 (0.029) | 0.845 (0.034) | 4.49×10−33 |
| cg04083076 | 0.735 (0.051) | 0.642 (0.056) | 0.541 (0.135) | 1.16×10−34 | 0.752 (0.055) | 0.681 (0.077) | 0.607 (0.142) | 1.65×10−20 |
| cg09671955 | 0.538 (0.059) | 0.479 (0.066) | 0.403 (0.063) | 8.00×10−17 | 0.556 (0.066) | 0.503 (0.071) | 0.490 (0.053) | 2.76×10−10 |
p-values were adjusted for age, sex, batch, chip and cell type composition.
In the F5L-families study, the rs970740 was not genotyped but substituted by the proxy rs2420371 that is in complete association (r2 = 1) with it.
Association of rs970740 and rs6025 with SLC19A2 cg16548605 CpG and ACVn levels in the MARTHA study.
| cg16548605 | ACVn (log) | |
| Univariate analysis (1) | ||
| rs970740 | β = −0.049 (0.0022) p = 1.61 10−66 | β = −0.415 (0.043) p = 3.20 10−18 |
| rs6025 | β = −0.044 (0.0035) p = 1.9 10−29 | β = −0.653 (0.042) p = 3.58 10−37 |
| Joint analysis (2) | ||
| rs970740 | β = −0.050 (0.0033) p = 1.05 10−38 | β = −0.014 (0.052) p = 0.79 |
| rs6025 | β = 0.001 (0.004) p = 0.90 | β = −0.641 (0.062) p = 1.65 10−20 |
Association is expressed as the additive effect of the minor alleles on the variability of cg16548605 and log ACVn (95% Confidence Interval) adjusted for age, sex, batch, chip and cell type composition. In the univariate analysis(1), one SNP at a time is used as a covariate for predicting the phenotype. In the joint analysis (2), both SNPs are simultaneously introduced as predictors in the linear regression models.