| Literature DB >> 25265390 |
Zhihao Liu1, Pingmin Wei2, Minghao Huang1, Yuan bao Liu1, Lucy Li3, Xiao Gong4, Juan Chen5, Xiaoning Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to the increase incidents of premarital sex and the lack of reproductive health services, college students are at high risk of HIV/AIDS infections in China. This study was designed to examine the predictors of consistency of condom use among college students based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model and to describe the relationships between the model constructs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25265390 PMCID: PMC4181955 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Socio-economic, demographic characteristics and sexual and reproductive risk behaviors of the participants.
| Characteristic variables | N | % |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 1544 | 48.5 |
| Female | 1639 | 51.5 |
| Age (years) | ||
| 16–20 | 2122 | 66.7 |
| 21–25 | 1061 | 33.3 |
| Hometown | ||
| Urban | 1988 | 62.5 |
| Rural | 1195 | 37.5 |
| Grade | ||
| freshman | 813 | 25.5 |
| sophomore | 763 | 24.0 |
| junior | 909 | 28.6 |
| senior | 698 | 21.9 |
| Experience of premarital sex | ||
| Yes | 342 | 10.7 |
| No | 2841 | 89.3 |
| Consistent condom use | ||
| Yes | 105 | 30.7 |
| No | 237 | 69.3 |
| Experience of abortion | ||
| Yes | 47 | 13.7 |
| No | 295 | 86.3 |
| Multiple sex partners | ||
| Yes | 112 | 32.7 |
| No | 230 | 67.3 |
| oral sex | ||
| Yes | 218 | 63.7 |
| No | 124 | 36.3 |
| anal sex | ||
| Yes | 31 | 9.1 |
| No | 311 | 90.9 |
Summary statistics and factor loadings of the IMB model in confirmatory factor analysis.
| Scales | M | SD | FL | |
| Information | ||||
| Prevention knowledge (%correct) | (Ia) | 71.50 | 20.09 | 0.62 |
| Transmission knowledge (%correct) | (Ib) | 86.31 | 13.23 | 0.57 |
| Motivation (1–5) | ||||
| Fear of being suspected that he/she had sexual experience before | (Ma) | 3.66 | 1.05 | 0.71 |
| Fear of being suspected of having STDs | (Mb) | 4.00 | 1.01 | 0.90 |
| Suspect that sex partner is suffering from STDs | (Mc) | 3.96 | 1.02 | 0.91 |
| Fear of being refused by sex partner | (Md) | 3.83 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
| Being uncertain on sex partner’s feeling | (Me) | 3.56 | 1.08 | 0.50 |
| Behavioral skills (1–5) | ||||
| Can you discuss safe sex with sex partner before sex? | (Sa) | 4.03 | 1.08 | 0.66 |
| Will you ask sexual partner’s sexual experience before sex? | (Sb) | 3.55 | 1.12 | 0.38 |
| Will you apply condoms before sexual intercourse occurs? | (Sc) | 3.89 | 1.04 | 0.67 |
| Can you correctly use a condom during sexual intercourse? | (Sd) | 4.13 | 0.93 | 0.71 |
| Preventive behavior (1–5) | ||||
| Will you consistently use condom when having premarital sex? | (CCU) | 4.32 | 0.91 | - |
M = means; SD = standard deviation;
*FL = factor loadings, all significant ≤0.001.
Figure 1The initial predictive IMB model.
Structural equation model depicts regression paths in the IMB model (N = 3183). Large circles represent latent variables; rectangles represent single-item indicators; single-headed arrows represent regression coefficients. Regression coefficients are standardized.
Correlation among model variable.
| I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII | IX | X | XI | XII | ||
| I | Ia | 1 | |||||||||||
| II | Ib | 0.356++ | 1 | ||||||||||
| III | Ma | 0.057++ | 0.069++ | 1 | |||||||||
| IV | Mb | 0.075++ | 0.095++ | 0.659++ | 1 | ||||||||
| V | Mc | 0.077++ | 0.086++ | 0.622++ | 0.830++ | 1 | |||||||
| VI | Md | 0.066++ | 0.051+ | 0.508++ | 0.589++ | 0.631++ | 1 | ||||||
| VII | Me | 0.038 | 0.075++ | 0.391++ | 0.413++ | 0.432++ | 0.491++ | 1 | |||||
| VIII | Sa | 0.075++ | 0.063++ | 0.242++ | 0.229++ | 0.229++ | 0.229++ | 0.251++ | 1 | ||||
| IX | Sb | 0.024 | 0.015 | 0.124++ | 0.102++ | 0.109++ | 0.109++ | 0.147++ | 0.330++ | 1 | |||
| X | Sc | 0.082++ | 0.066++ | 0.216++ | 0.188++ | 0.190++ | 0.172++ | 0.259++ | 0.378++ | 0.286++ | 1 | ||
| XI | Sd | 0.091++ | 0.072++ | 0.195++ | 0.217++ | 0.217++ | 0.212++ | 0.310++ | 0.406++ | 0.224++ | 0.589++ | 1 | |
| XII | CCU | 0.093++ | 0.070++ | 0.242++ | 0.259++ | 0.252++ | 0.243++ | 0.290++ | 0.586++ | 0.222++ | 0.390++ | 0.464++ | 1 |
*p<0.05; + p<0.01; ++ p<0.001.
Figure 2The final predictive IMB model.
Structural equation model depicts regression paths in the IMB model (N = 3183). Large circles represent latent variables; rectangles represent single-item indicators; single-headed arrows represent regression coefficients. Regression coefficients are standardized.
The path coefficient table of the final model.
| Path | regression coefficient | standard regress-ion coefficient | standard Error | T |
| ||
| Behavioral skills | ← | Information | 0.150 | 0.138 | 0.032 | 4.644 | <0.001 |
| Behavioral skills | ← | Motivation | 0.365 | 0.363 | 0.022 | 16.577 | <0.001 |
| Preventive behavior | ← | Behavioral skills | 0.878 | 0.754 | 0.031 | 28.528 | <0.001 |
| Ia | ← | Information | 1.000 | 0.601 | |||
| Ib | ← | Information | 1.082 | 0.592 | 0.202 | 5.369 | <0.001 |
| Ma | ← | Motivation | 1.000 | 0.732 | |||
| Mb | ← | Motivation | 1.135 | 0.883 | 0.025 | 44.776 | <0.001 |
| Mc | ← | Motivation | 1.212 | 0.937 | 0.025 | 47.654 | <0.001 |
| Md | ← | Motivation | 0.859 | 0.674 | 0.024 | 36.000 | <0.001 |
| Me | ← | Motivation | 1.343 | 0.983 | 0.076 | 17.734 | <0.001 |
| Sa | ← | Behavioral skills | 1.000 | 0.581 | |||
| Sb | ← | Behavioral skills | 0.447 | 0.315 | 0.029 | 15.437 | <0.001 |
| Sc | ← | Behavioral skills | 0.698 | 0.530 | 0.029 | 24.083 | <0.001 |
| Sd | ← | Behavioral skills | 0.749 | 0.635 | 0.027 | 27.470 | <0.001 |
| CCU | ← | Preventive behavior | 1.000 | 0.813 | |||