| Literature DB >> 19383171 |
Qiaoqin Ma1, Masako Ono-Kihara, Liming Cong, Guozhang Xu, Xiaohong Pan, Saman Zamani, Shahrzad Mortazavi Ravari, Dandan Zhang, Takayuki Homma, Masahiro Kihara.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To explore any association between the timing of the initiation of sexual activity and sexual behaviors and risks among university students in China.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19383171 PMCID: PMC2674603 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Socio-demographic characteristics of sexually active males by timing of sex initiation.
| Variables | Timing of sex initiation | ||
| BHS (n = 115)a | HS (n = 705)a | Univ (n = 1088)a | |
| Current age | |||
| ≤ 19 | 21.4 | 24.3 | 6.7 |
| > 19 | 78.6 | 75.7 | 93.3 |
| Grade | |||
| I | 40.9 | 40.4 | 8.5 |
| II | 30.4 | 28.9 | 26.9 |
| III | 23.5 | 26.4 | 42.4 |
| IV | 5.2 | 4.3 | 22.2 |
| Familys' economic status | |||
| Rich | 14.9 | 14.5 | 10.8 |
| Between | 73.7 | 79.1 | 82.2 |
| Poor | 11.4 | 6.4 | 7.0 |
| Hometown area | |||
| Countryside | 24.6 | 19.1 | 27.3 |
| Town/city | 75.4 | 80.9 | 72.7 |
| Mean age of first sex | |||
| ± SDb | 15.53 ± 1.94 | 18.38 ± 1.25 | 20.44 ± 1.16 |
a Data were shown in percentages, and the perentages of some items may not add up to 100 due to missing data.
b SD, standard deviation.
Timing of sex initiation and its association with subesequent sexual behaviors and risks.
| Variables | Total (n = 1908)a | BHS (n = 115)a | HS (n = 705)a | Univ (n = 1088)a | |
| Partner type | |||||
| Regular | 85.4 | 60.9 | 83.4 | 89.2 | |
| Non-regualr | 13.9 | 35.7 | 16.2 | 10.2 | < 0.001 |
| Condom use | |||||
| Used | 29.8 | 15.7 | 27.2 | 32.9 | < 0.001 |
| Not used/unsure | 69.8 | 84.3 | 72.2 | 66.6 | |
| Partner type | |||||
| Regular | 78.6 | 62.6 | 78.0 | 80.7 | |
| Non-regualr | 10.5 | 26.1 | 11.2 | 8.4 | < 0.001 |
| Condom use | |||||
| Used | 44.2 | 32.2 | 42.3 | 46.7 | 0.002 |
| Not use | 46.9 | 59.1 | 48.9 | 44.3 | |
| OC use by partner | |||||
| Used | 23.8 | 21.7 | 23.3 | 24.4 | 0.429 |
| Not use | 66.1 | 70.4 | 66.4 | 65.4 | |
| Partner type | |||||
| Only regular | 83.0 | 55.0 | 81.8 | 86.5 | |
| Ever non-regular | 14.7 | 40.0 | 17.4 | 10.6 | < 0.001 |
| Condom use | |||||
| Always/often | 40.3 | 18.8 | 35.6 | 45.2 | < 0.001 |
| Never/rarely/sometime | 55.1 | 76.3 | 60.4 | 49.9 | |
| OC use by partner | |||||
| Always/often | 22.3 | 13.8 | 20.2 | 24.4 | 0.003 |
| Never/rarely/sometime | 74.8 | 83.8 | 77.8 | 72.1 | |
| Partner number | |||||
| 1 | 74.1 | 33.8 | 66.0 | 82.9 | |
| ≥ 2 | 17.6 | 40.0 | 25.6 | 10.6 | < 0.001 |
| Condom use | |||||
| Always/often | 41.7 | 20.9 | 38.3 | 46.1 | < 0.001 |
| Never/rarely/sometime | 52.8 | 74.8 | 55.9 | 48.4 | |
| Partner number | |||||
| 1 | 56.9 | 15.7 | 40.7 | 71.8 | |
| ≥ 2 | 32.1 | 67.0 | 47.9 | 18.1 | < 0.001 |
| Anal sex | |||||
| Yes | 3.9 | 12.2 | 4.3 | 2.8 | < 0.001 |
| No | 90.7 | 83.5 | 90.1 | 91.8 | |
| Partner's pregancy | |||||
| Yes | 10.2 | 24.3 | 10.2 | 8.6 | < 0.001 |
| No/unsure | 85.3 | 70.4 | 84.8 | 87.2 | |
| Partner's induced abortion | |||||
| Yes | 9.6 | 23.5 | 9.8 | 8.0 | < 0.001 |
| No/unsure | 85.6 | 70.4 | 84.7 | 87.8 | |
| Diagnosed with an STD | |||||
| Yes | 1.3 | 7.0 | 1.6 | 0.6 | < 0.001 |
| No | 89.3 | 86.1 | 87.8 | 90.5 |
a Data were shown in percentages, and the perentages of some items may not add up to 100 due to missing data.
b Chi square test for linear trend in proportion.
c n = 1409, 80, 500, 829, for Total, BHS, HS, Univ initiator, respectively.
Multivariate analyses assessing the effects of timing of sexual initiation on subsequent sexual behavior and risks.
| Variables | BHS | HS | Univ |
| Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) | |||
| Partner type first sexa | |||
| Non-regular vs. regular | 5.24 (3.28–8.36) | 1.90 (1.40–2.59) | 1.00 |
| Condom use first sexa | |||
| Not used/unsure vs. used | 2.55 (1.50–4.33) | 1.30 (1.03–1.64) | 1.00 |
| Partner type recent sexa | |||
| Non-regular vs. regular | 3.70(2.22–6.15) | 1.36 (0.96–1.95) | 1.00 |
| Condom use recent sexa | |||
| Not used vs. used | 1.62 (1.05–2.52) | 1.06 (0.85–1.33) | 1.00 |
| Partner type last yearb | |||
| Non-regular vs. regular | 1.01 (0.40–2.54) | 0.96 (0.61–1.53) | 1.00 |
| Condom use last yearb | |||
| Never/rarely/sometime vs. always/often | 3.28 (1.36–7.89) | 1.24 (0.88–1.73) | 1.00 |
| OC use by partner last yearb | |||
| Never/rarely/sometime vs. always/often | 2.68 (1.03–6.98) | 1.40 (0.96–2.06) | 1.00 |
| Partner number last yearb | |||
| ≥ 2 vs. 1 | 1.44 (0.58–3.62) | 1.43 (0.93–2.21) | 1.00 |
| Condom use lifetimeb | |||
| Never/rarely/sometimes vs. always/often | 3.55 (1.74–7.26) | 1.17 (0.88–1.56) | 1.00 |
| Partner number lifetimeb | |||
| ≥ 2 vs.1 | 4.19 (1.84–9.54) | 2.81 (2.02–3.89) | 1.00 |
| Anal sex lifetimeb | |||
| Yes vs. no | 2.28 (0.63–8.23) | 1.15 (0.55–2.42) | 1.00 |
| Partner's pregancy lifetimeb | |||
| Yes vs. no/unsure | 2.89 (1.21–6.94) | 1.42 (0.91–2.22) | 1.00 |
| Partner's induced abortion lifetimeb | |||
| Yes vs. no/unsure | 2.95 (1.20–7.26) | 1.48 (0.93–2.36) | 1.00 |
| Diagnosed with an STD lifetimeb | |||
| Yes vs. no | 26.13 (2.94–232.09) | 5.11 (1.20–2.76) | 1.00 |
a Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval in parentheses is adjusted for university, grade, faculty, hometown area, and family economic status.
b Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval in parentheses is further adjusted for the duration of sexual experience.