Literature DB >> 25264764

Endoscopists can sustain high performance for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps following standardized and continued training.

Sarah K McGill1, Roy Soetikno1, Amit Rastogi2, Robert V Rouse3, Tohru Sato1, Ajay Bansal2, Kenneth McQuaid4, Tonya Kaltenbach1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The learning curve for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps with the narrow-band imaging (NBI) is unknown. To forego histological analysis of diminutive polyps diagnosed optically with high confidence, guidelines recommend ≥ 90 % negative predictive value (NPV) and concordance of ≥ 90 % for surveillance intervals predicted optically and histologically. We aimed to study the learning of optical diagnosis for colorectal polyps. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied five endoscopists as part of a randomized multisite trial comparing near-focus and standard-focus views for optical diagnosis. They trained using a computer-based module, followed by 10 real-time colonoscopies with pathology correlation. Endoscopists then optically diagnosed and resected all the polyps found during 558 consecutive colonoscopies, and diagnoses were compared with pathology. Endoscopists repeated the training module at the study midpoint. NPV and concordance of surveillance intervals for diminutive polyps diagnosed optically with high confidence were measured over time.
RESULTS: Endoscopists showed high diagnostic performance, with a nonsignificant trend toward higher NPV in the second half of the study. For the 445 polyps in the standard-view arm, the NPV was 88.0 % (95 %CI 75.7 % - 95.5 %) in the first half and 95.8 % (88.3 % - 99.1 %) in the second; P = 0.7. Three endoscopists in the first half and four in the second achieved > 90 % NPV. Concordance of surveillance intervals was identical in the first and second halves at 98.1 % (95 %CI 93.3 % - 99.8 %).
CONCLUSIONS: High NPV for the prediction of non-neoplasms with NBI was achieved and maintained in this group of endoscopists who participated in standardized and continued training. Both NPV and surveillance interval agreement indicated high performance in the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps and exceeded thresholds. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25264764     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1378096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  10 in total

1.  Digital chromoendoscopy utilization in clinical practice: A survey of gastroenterologists in Connecticut.

Authors:  Karl M Langberg; Neil D Parikh; Yanhong Deng; Maria Ciarlegio; Loren Laine; Harry R Aslanian
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-05-06

2.  Endoscopic imaging.

Authors:  Vani J A Konda
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06

3.  Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps with Blue Light Imaging using a new international classification.

Authors:  Sharmila Subramaniam; Bu Hayee; Patrick Aepli; Erik Schoon; Milan Stefanovic; Kesavan Kandiah; Sreedhari Thayalasekaran; Asma Alkandari; Paul Bassett; Emmanuel Coron; Oliver Pech; Cesare Hassan; Helmut Neumann; Raf Bisschops; Alessandro Repici; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Real-Time Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps in the Routine Clinical Practice Using the NICE and WASP Classifications in a Nonacademic Setting.

Authors:  Joana Castela; Susana Mão de Ferro; Isadora Rosa; Pedro Lage; Sara Ferreira; João Pereira Silva; João Cortez Pinto; Rita Vale Rodrigues; Joana Moleiro; Isabel Claro; Susana Esteves; António Dias Pereira
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-10

Review 5.  Optical Diagnosis for Colorectal Polyps: A Useful Technique Now or in the Future?

Authors:  Ignasi Puig; Tonya Kaltenbach
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 4.519

6.  Use of image-enhanced endoscopy in the characterization of colorectal polyps: Still some ways to go.

Authors:  Othman R Alharbi; Nouf S Alballa; Areej S AlRajeh; Lulwah S Alturki; Ibrahim M Alfuraih; Mouhab R Jamalaldeen; Majid A Almadi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.485

7.  Standards of diagnostic colonoscopy for early-stage neoplasia: Recommendations by an Asian private group.

Authors:  Yasushi Sano; Han-Mo Chiu; Xiao-Bo Li; Supakij Khomvilai; Pises Pisespongsa; Jonard Tan Co; Takuji Kawamura; Nozomu Kobayashi; Shinji Tanaka; David G Hewett; Yoji Takeuchi; Kenichiro Imai; Takahiro Utsumi; Akira Teramoto; Daizen Hirata; Mineo Iwatate; Rajvinder Singh; Siew C Ng; Shiaw-Hooi Ho; Philip Chiu; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 7.559

8.  Uptake and barriers for implementation of the resect and discard strategy: an international survey.

Authors:  Philippe Willems; Roupen Djinbachian; Saskia Ditisheim; Sinan Orkut; Heiko Pohl; Alan Barkun; Mickael Bouin; Bernard Faulques; Daniel von Renteln
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-04-17

9.  Effect of educational lecture on the diagnostic accuracy of Japan NBI Expert Team classification for colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Yuki Okamoto; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Yuki Kamigaichi; Hirosato Tamari; Yasutsugu Shimohara; Tomoyuki Nishimura; Katsuaki Inagaki; Hidenori Tanaka; Kenta Matsumoto; Ken Yamashita; Kyoku Sumimoto; Yuki Ninomiya; Nana Hayashi; Yasuhiko Kitadai; Kenichi Yoshimura; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Learning curve for endoscopic evaluation of vocal folds lesions with narrow band imaging.

Authors:  Michał Żurek; Anna Rzepakowska; Ewa Osuch-Wójcikiewicz; Kazimierz Niemczyk
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.