Literature DB >> 31559322

Real-Time Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps in the Routine Clinical Practice Using the NICE and WASP Classifications in a Nonacademic Setting.

Joana Castela1, Susana Mão de Ferro1, Isadora Rosa1, Pedro Lage1, Sara Ferreira1, João Pereira Silva1, João Cortez Pinto1, Rita Vale Rodrigues1, Joana Moleiro1, Isabel Claro1, Susana Esteves2, António Dias Pereira1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Narrow-band imaging (NBI) allows "in vivo" classification of colorectal polyps.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the optical diagnosis by nonexpert community-based endoscopists in routine clinical practice, the impact of training, and whether the endoscopists could achieve the threshold for the "do not resect" policy.
METHODS: This was an observational study performed in two periods (P1 and P2). Endoscopists had no prior experience in NBI in P1 and applied the technique on a daily basis for 1 year before participation in P2. Lesions were classified by applying the NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) and Workgroup serrAted polypS and Polyposis (WASP) classifications, simultaneously.
RESULTS: A total of 290 polyps were analyzed. The overall accuracy of optical diagnosis was 0.75 (95% CI 0.68-0.81) in P1, with an increase to 0.82 (95% CI 0.73-0.89) in P2 (p = 0.260). The accuracy of the NICE/WASP classifications to differentiate adenomatous from nonadenomatous histology was 0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.84) in P1 and 0.86 (95% CI 0.77-0.92) in P2 (p = 0.164); assignments made with a high confidence level achieved statistical significance (13% improvement, 95% CI 3-22%; p = 0.022). The negative predictive value for adenomatous histology of diminutive rectosigmoid polyps was 81% (95% CI 64-93%) and 80% (95% CI 59-93%) in P1 and P2, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonexpert endoscopists achieved moderate accuracy for real-time optical diagnosis of colorectal lesions with the NICE/WASP classifications. The overall performance of the endoscopists improved after sustained use of optical diagnosis, but did not achieve the standards for the implementation of the "do not resect" strategy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal polyps; Learning effect; Narrow-band imaging; Optical diagnosis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31559322      PMCID: PMC6751415          DOI: 10.1159/000495258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2387-1954


  40 in total

Review 1.  The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Narrow band imaging and multiband imaging.

Authors:  Louis Michel Wong Kee Song; Douglas G Adler; Jason D Conway; David L Diehl; Francis A Farraye; Sergey V Kantsevoy; Richard Kwon; Petar Mamula; Betsy Rodriguez; Raj J Shah; William M Tierney
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Regula; Maciej Rupinski; Ewa Kraszewska; Marcin Polkowski; Jacek Pachlewski; Janina Orlowska; Marek P Nowacki; Eugeniusz Butruk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Narrow band imaging with magnification for the characterization of small and diminutive colonic polyps: pit pattern and vascular pattern intensity.

Authors:  J E East; N Suzuki; P Bassett; M Stavrinidis; H J Thomas; T Guenther; P P Tekkis; B P Saunders
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Narrow-band imaging without high magnification to differentiate polyps during real-time colonoscopy: improvement with experience.

Authors:  Jason N Rogart; Dhanpat Jain; Uzma D Siddiqui; Tal Oren; Joseph Lim; Priya Jamidar; Harry Aslanian
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography.

Authors:  David Lieberman; Matthew Moravec; Jennifer Holub; Leann Michaels; Glenn Eisen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Estimation of impact of American College of Radiology recommendations on CT colonography reporting for resection of high-risk adenoma findings.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Andrew J Overhiser; Shawn C Chen; Oscar W Cummings; Thomas M Ulbright
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas.

Authors:  Lynn F Butterly; Michael P Chase; Heiko Pohl; Gale S Fiarman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Recognition of surface mucosal and vascular patterns of colon polyps by using narrow-band imaging: interobserver and intraobserver agreement and prediction of polyp histology.

Authors:  Amit Rastogi; Krishna Pondugula; Ajay Bansal; Sachin Wani; John Keighley; Jason Sugar; Peggy Callahan; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optical diagnosis by near-focus versus normal-focus narrow band imaging colonoscopy in colorectal polyps based on combined NICE and WASP classification: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nisa Netinatsunton; Natcha Cheewasereechon; Tanawat Pattarapuntakul; Jaksin Sottisuporn; Kanet Kanjanapradit; Bancha Ovartlarnporn
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-09-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.