Literature DB >> 22422050

Broadening research consent in the era of genome-informed medicine.

Courtney Kronenthal1, Susan K Delaney, Michael F Christman.   

Abstract

Genetic variant associations and advances in research technologies are generating an unprecedented volume of genomic data. Whole-genome sequencing will introduce even greater depth to current data sets and will propel medical research and development. Yet as one area of biomedical research evolves, another stagnates: informed consent. As presently employed, informed consent is not entirely attuned to the era of whole-genome sequencing. The greatest value of genomic data lays in its accessibility over time; the current model of informed consent restricts the use of data and does not readily accommodate prospective basic and clinical research, a priori research, or opportunities to act upon incidental findings. It also disengages the research participant from the discovery process, discouraging the provision of research results that may have clinical value to that individual. A revisited informed consent approach-the Informed Cohort Oversight Board (ICOB)-has been proven successful at consenting individuals to a model which facilitates the simultaneous construction of longitudinal data with the return of results to participants as scientific knowledge and technology allows. The opportunity to sequence once and consult often is cost-effective, encourages scientific innovation, and provides the opportunity to quickly translate genomics into better clinical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22422050     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2011.76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  10 in total

1.  The challenge of informed consent and return of results in translational genomics: empirical analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; Susan M Wolf; Kristine J Kuczynski; Steven Joffe; Richard R Sharp; D Williams Parsons; Bartha M Knoppers; Joon-Ho Yu; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 2.  Evolving approaches to the ethical management of genomic data.

Authors:  Jean E McEwen; Joy T Boyer; Kathie Y Sun
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Erik Parens; Cameron R Waldman; Robert Klitzman; Abby Fyer; Josue Martinez; W Nicholson Price; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?

Authors:  Iris Jaitovich Groisman; Nathalie Egalite; Beatrice Godard
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Common genetic risk for melanoma encourages preventive behavior change.

Authors:  Lori Diseati; Laura B Scheinfeldt; Rachel S Kasper; Ruixue Zhaoyang; Neda Gharani; Tara J Schmidlen; Erynn S Gordon; Cecili K Sessions; Susan K Delaney; Joseph P Jarvis; Norman Gerry; Michael Christman
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2015-02-17

6.  Informed consent for next-generation nucleotide sequencing studies: Aiding communication between participants and investigators.

Authors:  Rhonda G Kost; Stephen M Poppel; Barry S Coller
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-02-07

7.  Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic research.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Cameron R Waldman; Abby Fyer; Robert Klitzman; Erik Parens; Josue Martinez; W Nicholson Price; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Approaches to informed consent for hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating clinical genomics research.

Authors:  Flavia M Facio; Julie C Sapp; Amy Linn; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance.

Authors:  Effy Vayena; Alessandro Blasimme
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 1.352

10.  Precision Military Medicine: Conducting a multi-site clinical utility study of genomic and lifestyle risk factors in the United States Air Force.

Authors:  Susan K Delaney; Ruth Brenner; Tara J Schmidlen; Michael P Dempsey; Kim E London; Erynn S Gordon; Mark Bellafante; Ashley Nasuti; Laura B Scheinfeldt; Kaveri D Rajula; Leo Jose; Joseph P Jarvis; Norman P Gerry; Michael F Christman
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 8.617

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.