Literature DB >> 25260541

Variation in pregnancy intendedness across U.S. women's pregnancies.

Karina M Shreffler1, Arthur L Greil, Katherine Stamps Mitchell, Julia McQuillan.   

Abstract

How stable are women's pregnancy intentions across their reproductive lifespans? Are there demographic, social, or attitudinal characteristics that are associated with differing pregnancy intentions patterns? Patterns of intendedness across pregnancies were examined using a sample of 3,110 women ages 25-45 who have been pregnant at least twice from the National Survey of Fertility Barriers. Multinomial logistic regression analyses assessed associations between patterns of intentions and respondents' economic/social status, values and ideologies to determine if intentions are a stable characteristic or pregnancy-specific. The majority of women (60 %) reported varying intendedness across individual pregnancies, indicating that intendedness tends to be pregnancy-specific. Sociodemographic status as well as values and ideologies were significantly associated with pregnancy intendedness patterns. Compared to women who intended each pregnancy, women who were ambivalent, did not intend each pregnancy, or had intermittent intendedness were more likely to be single, younger, Black, report lower importance of motherhood and religiosity and were less likely to be Hispanic. A substantial proportion of women report the intendedness of their pregnancies varied between pregnancies. Research and policy addressing unintended pregnancies should consider that pregnancy intentions are not a static characteristic of most women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25260541     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-014-1615-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  13 in total

1.  Ambivalent feelings about parenthood may lead to inconsistent contraceptive use--and pregnancy.

Authors:  L S Zabin
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

2.  Multinomial logistic regression.

Authors:  Chanyeong Kwak; Alan Clayton-Matthews
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples.

Authors:  Warren B Miller; Lawrence J Severy; David J Pasta
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2004

4.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Repeat unintended, unwanted and seriously mistimed childbearing in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wildsmith; Karen Benjamin Guzzo; Sarah R Hayford
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2010-03

6.  Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Mia R Zolna
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Fertility following an unintended first birth.

Authors:  Karen Benjamin Guzzo; Sarah Hayford
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2011-11

8.  The public costs of births resulting from unintended pregnancies: national and state-level estimates.

Authors:  Adam Sonfield; Kathryn Kost; Rachel Benson Gold; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-05-19

9.  Pregnancy intentions among women who do not try: focusing on women who are okay either way.

Authors:  Julia McQuillan; Arthur L Greil; Karina M Shreffler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-02

10.  The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course.

Authors:  Sarah R Hayford
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2009-11
View more
  9 in total

1.  Pregnancy intentions-a complex construct and call for new measures.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Katherine J Sapra; Rosalind B King; Jean Fredo Louis; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Norms and stigma around unintended pregnancy in Alabama: Associations with recent contraceptive use and dual method use among young women.

Authors:  Whitney S Rice; Bulent Turan; Kari White; Janet M Turan
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2018-01-15

3.  Are Uncertain Fertility Intentions a Temporary or Long-term Outlook? Findings from a Panel Study.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2016-11-09

4.  Does It Matter What She Wants? The Role of Individual Preferences Against Unmarried Motherhood in Young Women's Likelihood of a Nonmarital First Birth.

Authors:  Rachel M Shattuck
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2017-08

5.  Factors Associated with Unplanned Pregnancy Among Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Lisa M Shandley; Lauren M Kipling; Jessica B Spencer; Diane Morof; Ann C Mertens; Penelope P Howards
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.017

6.  Pathways to Parenthood in Social and Family Context: Decade in Review, 2020.

Authors:  Karen Benjamin Guzzo; Sarah R Hayford
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2020-01-05

7.  Factors associated with unintended pregnancy in Brazil: cross-sectional results from the Birth in Brazil National Survey, 2011/2012.

Authors:  Mariza Miranda Theme-Filha; Marcia Leonardi Baldisserotto; Ana Claudia Santos Amaral Fraga; Susan Ayers; Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama; Maria do Carmo Leal
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Sexual and Reproductive Health and Reproductive Coercion in Women Victim/Survivors Receiving Housing Support.

Authors:  Karen Trister Grace; Charvonne N Holliday; Kristin Bevilacqua; Arshdeep Kaur; Janice Miller; Michele R Decker
Journal:  J Fam Violence       Date:  2022-03-08

9.  The role of pregnancy acceptability in maternal mental health and bonding during pregnancy.

Authors:  Josephine McNamara; Alixandra Risi; Amy L Bird; Michelle L Townsend; Jane S Herbert
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.