Literature DB >> 20449643

Pregnancy intentions among women who do not try: focusing on women who are okay either way.

Julia McQuillan1, Arthur L Greil, Karina M Shreffler.   

Abstract

Are women who are intentional about pregnancy (trying to or trying not to get pregnant) systematically different from women who are "okay either way" about getting pregnant? We use a currently sexually active subsample (n = 3,771) of the National Survey of Fertility Barriers, a random digit dialing telephone survey of reproductive-aged women (ages 25-45) in the United States. We compare women who are trying to, trying not to, or okay either way about getting pregnant on attitudes, social pressures, life course and status characteristics using bivariate analyses (chi-square tests for categorical and ANOVA tests for continuous variables). Multivariate multinomial logistic regression provides adjusted associations. Most women say that they are trying not to get pregnant (71%) or are okay either way (23%); few are trying to get pregnant. Among women with no prior pregnancies (n = 831), more say that they are trying to get pregnant (14%) but a similar percentage are okay either way (26%). Several characteristics distinguish those trying to from those okay: fertility intentions, importance of motherhood, age, parity, race/ethnicity and self identifying a fertility problem. Additional characteristics are associated with trying not to get pregnant compared to being okay: ideal number of children, wanting a baby, trusting conception, relationship satisfaction, race ethnicity, economic hardship, and attitudes about career success. Women who are "okay either way" about pregnancy should be assessed separately from women who are intentional (trying to, trying not to) about pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20449643      PMCID: PMC3010258          DOI: 10.1007/s10995-010-0604-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  20 in total

1.  Ambivalent feelings about parenthood may lead to inconsistent contraceptive use--and pregnancy.

Authors:  L S Zabin
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

2.  A reminder that human behavior frequently refuses to conform to models created by researchers.

Authors:  K C Luker
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

3.  Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum?

Authors:  C A Bachrach; S Newcomer
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

4.  Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness.

Authors:  J B Stanford; R Hobbs; P Jameson; M J DeWitt; R C Fischer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

5.  Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: evidence from the United States.

Authors:  John S Santelli; Laura Duberstein Lindberg; Mark G Orr; Lawrence B Finer; Ilene Speizer
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2009-06

6.  Partner effects on a woman's intention to conceive: 'not with this partner'.

Authors:  L S Zabin; G R Huggins; M R Emerson; V E Cullins
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

7.  The effect of stepchildren on childbearing intentions and births.

Authors:  Susan D Stewart
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2002-02

8.  Differences between mistimed and unwanted pregnancies among women who have live births.

Authors:  Denise V D'Angelo; Brenda Colley Gilbert; Roger W Rochat; John S Santelli; Joan M Herold
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

9.  What is a 'planned' pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study.

Authors:  Geraldine Barrett; Kaye Wellings
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Kathryn Kost; Susheela Singh; Barbara Vaughan; James Trussell; Akinrinola Bankole
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  34 in total

1.  Relationship characteristics and feelings about pregnancy among black and puerto rican young adults.

Authors:  Marion Carter; Joan M Kraft; Linda Hock-Long; Kendra Hatfield-Timajchy
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2013-08-09

2.  The Misclassification of Ambivalence in Pregnancy Intentions: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gómez; Stephanie Arteaga; Elodia Villaseñor; Jennet Arcara; Bridget Freihart
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-02-14

3.  Pregnancy intentions-a complex construct and call for new measures.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Katherine J Sapra; Rosalind B King; Jean Fredo Louis; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Variation in pregnancy intendedness across U.S. women's pregnancies.

Authors:  Karina M Shreffler; Arthur L Greil; Katherine Stamps Mitchell; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-05

5.  Development and psychometric testing of the attitude toward potential pregnancy scale.

Authors:  Mary T Paterno; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2014-10-14

6.  Responding to Infertility: Lessons From a Growing Body of Research and Suggested Guidelines for Practice.

Authors:  Karina M Shreffler; Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Fam Relat       Date:  2017-10

7.  Do perceptions of their partners' childbearing desires affect young women's pregnancy risk? Further study of ambivalence.

Authors:  Warren B Miller; Jennifer S Barber; Paul Schulz
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2016-11-29

8.  Conceptualizing Childbearing Ambivalence: A Social and Dynamic Perspective.

Authors:  Christie Sennott; Sara Yeatman
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2018-05-09

9.  Measurement of unmet need for family planning: longitudinal analysis of the impact of fertility desires on subsequent childbearing behaviors among urban women from Uttar Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Ilene S Speizer; Lisa M Calhoun; Theresa Hoke; Ranajit Sengupta
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Revisiting the Association between Race, Ethnicity, and Beliefs about Pregnancy.

Authors:  Meredith G Manze; Diana R Romero
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 1.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.