Literature DB >> 25259663

Is there any predictor for residual disease after cervical conization with positive surgical margins for HSIL or microinvasive cervical cancer?

Tolga Tasci1, Taner Turan, Isin Ureyen, Alper Karalok, Rukiye Kalyoncu, Nurettin Boran, Gokhan Tulunay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify if there is any predictor of residual disease at repeat operation after cervical conization with positive surgical margins for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or microinvasive cervical cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of patients who underwent immediate repeat conization or hysterectomy because of positive surgical margins for HSIL or microinvasive cervical cancer reported after conization were obtained. The relation between the residual disease and age, parity, menopausal status, and the factors of first conization (method, cone base area, height of cone, endocervical margin, glandular and endocervical curettage specimen involvement, and the number of quadrants with positive surgical margins) was assessed. Standard statistical tests were used.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included. Mean time between the 2 operations was 5.1 weeks. Thirty-four patients (45.9%) had residual disease in the second-operation specimen: 4 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 24 HSILs, 5 microinvasive lesion, and 1 invasive cervical carcinoma. The number of involved quadrants was the only predictor of residual disease (41% if ≤2 and 80% if >2, p = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Residual disease is found in nearly half of repeat operations after conization with positive margins for HSIL or microinvasive cervical cancer. Particularly, residual disease is present in 80% of the patients with more than 2 involved quadrants. This should be considered when making management decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25259663     DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  7 in total

1.  Triage for management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin by conization: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Yuya Dou; Xiaodan Zhang; Yang Li; Fenfen Wang; Xing Xie; Xinyu Wang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Evaluation of Factors Affecting Margin Positivity and Persistent Disease After Leep for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Authors:  Anila Tresa Alukal; P Rema; S Suchetha; Dhanya Dinesh; Aleyamma Mathew; K M Jagathnath Krishna; Thara Somanathan; J Sivaranjith
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-03-12

3.  Risk Factors for Residual Disease in Hysterectomy Specimens After Conization in Post-Menopausal Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3.

Authors:  Xiaoqi Sun; Huifang Lei; Xiaoyan Xie; Guanyu Ruan; Jian An; Pengming Sun
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2020-11-10

4.  Optimal cone size to predict positive surgical margins after cold knife conization (CKC) and the risk factors for residual disease.

Authors:  Murat Öz; Nilüfer Çetinkaya; Elmas Korkmaz; Kerem Doğa Seçkin; Mehmet Mutlu Meydanlı; Tayfun Güngör
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-09-01

5.  Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization.

Authors:  Xinmei Wang; Juan Xu; Yang Gao; Pengpeng Qu
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Risk factors predicting residual lesion in subsequent hysterectomy following cold knife conization (CKC) for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL).

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Yong Zeng; Yahong Zheng; Jing Yang; Hua Wei; Cunjian Yi; Yan Liu; Keming Chen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Accuracy of conization procedure for predicting pathological parameters of radical hysterectomy in stage Ia2-Ib1 (≤2 cm) cervical cancer.

Authors:  Huimin Bai; Dongyan Cao; Fang Yuan; Huilan Wang; Meizhu Xiao; Jie Chen; Quancai Cui; Keng Shen; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.