Literature DB >> 25257901

Positive surgical margins in early stage oral cavity cancer: an analysis of 20,602 cases.

Alexander L Luryi1, Michelle M Chen1, Saral Mehra1, Sanziana A Roman2, Julie A Sosa3, Benjamin L Judson4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the incidence of positive surgical margins in early oral cavity cancer and identify patient, tumor, and system factors associated with their occurrence. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I or II oral cavity squamous cell cancer between 1998 and 2011 were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with positive margins were conducted.
RESULTS: In total, 20,602 patients with early oral cancer were identified. Margin status was reported in 94.8% of cases, and positive margins occurred in 7.5% of those cases. Incidence of positive margins by institution varied from 0% to 43.8%, with median incidence of 7.1%. Positive margins were associated with clinical factors including stage II disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-1.98), intermediate grade (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.37), high grade (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.39-2.03), and floor of mouth (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.52-2.08), buccal mucosa (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.59-2.68), and retromolar locations (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.85-3.11). Positive margins were also associated with treatment at nonacademic cancer centers (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.44) and institutions with a low oral cancer case volume (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.23-1.69).
CONCLUSION: Positive margins are associated with tumor factors, including stage, grade, and site, reflecting disease aggressiveness and difficulty of resection. Positive margins also are associated with factors such as treatment facility type, hospital case volume, and geographic region, suggesting potential variation in quality of care. Margin status may be a useful quality measure for early oral cavity cancer. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NCDB; cancer; head and neck cancer; margins; oral cancer; quality measure

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25257901     DOI: 10.1177/0194599814551718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  12 in total

1.  Proceedings: Pathways for Successful Translation of New Imaging Agents and Modalities-Phase III Studies.

Authors:  Sanjiv S Gambhir; Lalitha K Shankar; Eben Rosenthal; Jason M Warram; Munir Ghesani; Thomas A Hope; Paula M Jacobs; Gunilla B Jacobson; Terri Wilson; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Contemporary Approach to Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Christopher M K L Yao; Edward I Chang; Stephen Y Lai
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Development and Feasibility of a Specialty-Specific National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP): The Head and Neck-Reconstructive Surgery NSQIP.

Authors:  Carol M Lewis; Thomas A Aloia; Weiming Shi; Ira Martin; Stephen Y Lai; Jesse C Selber; Amy C Hessel; Matthew M Hanasono; Katherine A Hutcheson; Geoffrey L Robb; Randal S Weber
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Fluorescent Molecular Imaging Can Improve Intraoperative Sentinel Margin Detection in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Giri Krishnan; Nynke S van den Berg; Naoki Nishio; Shrey Kapoor; Jaqueline Pei; Laura Freeman; Yu-Jin Lee; Quan Zhou; Stan van Keulen; Shayan Farkurnejad; James Condon; Fred M Baik; Brock A Martin; Eben L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 11.082

Review 5.  Determining Adequate Margins in Head and Neck Cancers: Practice and Continued Challenges.

Authors:  Michelle D Williams
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Association of Facility Volume With Positive Margin Rate in the Surgical Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Cheryl C Nocon; Gaurav S Ajmani; Mihir K Bhayani
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.223

7.  Measuring Institutional Quality in Head and Neck Surgery Using Hospital-Level Data: Negative Margin Rates and Neck Dissection Yield.

Authors:  David W Schoppy; Kim F Rhoads; Yifei Ma; Michelle M Chen; Brian Nussenbaum; Ryan K Orosco; Eben L Rosenthal; Vasu Divi
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.223

8.  Positive surgical margin following radical nephrectomy is an independent predictor of local recurrence and disease-specific survival.

Authors:  Yasmin Abu-Ghanem; Jacob Ramon; Raanan Berger; Issac Kaver; Edi Fridman; Raya Leibowitz-Amit; Zohar A Dotan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Factors Influencing the Incidence of Severe Complications in Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstructions.

Authors:  Martin Broome; Naline Juilland; Yann Litzistorf; Yan Monnier; Kishore Sandu; Philippe Pasche; Peter K Plinkert; Philippe A Federspil; Christian Simon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-10-27

10.  Positive Surgical Margins in the 10 Most Common Solid Cancers.

Authors:  Ryan K Orosco; Viridiana J Tapia; Joseph A Califano; Bryan Clary; Ezra E W Cohen; Christopher Kane; Scott M Lippman; Karen Messer; Alfredo Molinolo; James D Murphy; John Pang; Assuntina Sacco; Kathryn R Tringale; Anne Wallace; Quyen T Nguyen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.