Literature DB >> 30347018

Association of Facility Volume With Positive Margin Rate in the Surgical Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer.

Cheryl C Nocon1,2, Gaurav S Ajmani2, Mihir K Bhayani1,2.   

Abstract

Importance: The achievement of complete tumor resection with tumor-free margins is one of the main principles of oncologic surgery for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The negative prognostic influence of a positive margin (PM) across all head and neck subsites has been well established. National guidelines recommend the use of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in the setting of PM. Objective: To determine the incidence of PM in HNSCC across multiple subsites, as well as the factors associated with its occurrence. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with HNSCC between 2010 and 2014 and who underwent surgical resection (n = 28 840). Main Outcomes and Measures: Predictors of PM rate and likelihood to receive adjuvant CRT.
Results: Among the 28 840 patients included in this study, 19 727 (68.4 %) were men, and the average age was 62.4 years (range, 40 to ≥90 years). In univariable analysis, a lower PM rate was associated with higher facility volume (26.3% for the lowest volume quartile, 16.5% for the middle 2 quartiles, and 10.8% for the highest volume quartile) and treatment at academic vs nonacademic facilities (14.0% vs 22.7%). In multivariate analysis, those treated at higher-volume facilities remained significantly less likely to have PM (adjusted odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.88). The trend of decreasing PM rate with increasing facility volume was observed in both academic (aOR, 0.88 per 10-case volume increase [95% CI, 0.85-0.91]) and nonacademic (aOR, 0.73 per 10-case volume increase [95% CI, 0.68-0.80]) facilities. There was no association between facility volume and patient likelihood of receiving adjuvant CRT in the setting of PM (compared with CCPs: aOR, 0.98 per 10-case volume increase [95% CI, 0.84-1.14] for CCCPs; and aOR, 1.24 [95% CI, 0.99-1.55] for INCPs). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that high-volume facilities are associated with lower rates of PM in the surgical treatment of HNSCC in both academic and nonacademic settings. Facility volume for head and neck oncologic surgeries may be considered a benchmark for quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30347018      PMCID: PMC6583090          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  30 in total

1.  Adherence to guideline-recommended process measures for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in Ontario: Impact of surgeon and hospital volume.

Authors:  Antoine Eskander; Eric Monteiro; Jonathan Irish; Patrick Gullane; Ralph Gilbert; John de Almeida; Dale Brown; Jeremy Freeman; David R Urbach; David P Goldstein
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Improvement in survival of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: An international collaborative study.

Authors:  Moran Amit; Tzu-Chen Yen; Chun-Ta Liao; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Luiz P Kowalski; Ardalan Ebrahimi; Jonathan R Clark; Matthias Kreppel; Joachim Zöller; Eran Fridman; Villaret A Bolzoni; Jatin P Shah; Yoav Binenbaum; Snehal G Patel; Ziv Gil
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  National trends in laryngeal cancer surgery and the effect of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes and cost of care.

Authors:  Christine G Gourin; Kevin D Frick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Prereferral head and neck cancer treatment: compliance with national comprehensive cancer network treatment guidelines.

Authors:  Carol M Lewis; Amy C Hessel; Dianna B Roberts; Yunxia Z Guo; F Christopher Holsinger; Lawrence E Ginsberg; Adel K El-Naggar; Randal S Weber
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-12

5.  The effect of treating institution on outcomes in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Amy Anne D Lassig; Anne M Joseph; Bruce R Lindgren; Patricia Fernandes; Sarah Cooper; Chelsea Schotzko; Samir Khariwala; Margaret Reynolds; Bevan Yueh
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Compliance with quality assurance measures in patients treated for early oral tongue cancer.

Authors:  Amy C Hessel; Mauricio A Moreno; Ehab Y Hanna; Dianna B Roberts; Jan S Lewin; Adel K El-Naggar; David I Rosenthal; Randal S Weber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Multivariate analyses to assess the effect of surgeon volume on survival rate in oral cancer: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Lee; Hsu-Chueh Ho; Pesus Chou
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  Early Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Sampling of Margins From Tumor Bed and Worse Local Control.

Authors:  Jessica H Maxwell; Lester D R Thompson; Margaret S Brandwein-Gensler; Bernhard G Weiss; Martin Canis; Bibianna Purgina; Arpan V Prabhu; Chi Lai; Yongli Shuai; William R Carroll; Anthony Morlandt; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Seungwon Kim; Jonas T Johnson; Robert L Ferris; Raja Seethala; Simion I Chiosea
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  The effect of the surgical margins on the outcome of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: single institution experience.

Authors:  Hany Eldeeb; Craig Macmillan; Christine Elwell; Abdulla Hammod
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.248

10.  The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  4 in total

1.  Quantifying Tumor and Vasculature Deformations during Laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Xiaotian Wu; David A Pastel; Rihan Khan; Clifford J Eskey; Yuan Shi; Michael Sramek; Joseph A Paydarfar; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 2.  Margin Analysis in Head and Neck Cancer: State of the Art and Future Directions.

Authors:  Michael M Li; Sidharth V Puram; Dustin A Silverman; Matthew O Old; James W Rocco; Stephen Y Kang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Do Microsurgical Outcomes Differ Based on Which Specialty Does the Operation? A NSQIP Analysis.

Authors:  Jacques X Zhang; Melissa Wan; Yichuan Ding; Yiwen Jin; Mahesh Nagarajan; Douglas J Courtemanche; Julie Bedford; Jugpal S Arneja
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-04-27

4.  Salvage surgery for patients with residual/persistent diseases after improper or insufficient treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma: can we rectify these mistakes?

Authors:  Yue He; Zhonglong Liu; Surui Sheng; Weijin Gao; Xiao Tang; Xiaoguang Li; Chunyue Ma
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 4.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.