Literature DB >> 25256624

Toric vs aspherical control intraocular lenses in patients with cataract and corneal astigmatism: a randomized clinical trial.

Nienke Visser1, Henny J M Beckers1, Noel J C Bauer1, Sacha T J M Gast1, Bart L M Zijlmans2, Tos T J M Berenschot1, Carroll A Webers1, Rudy M M A Nuijts1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Spectacle independence is becoming increasingly important in cataract surgery. Not correcting corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery will fail to achieve spectacle independency in 20% to 30% of patients.
OBJECTIVE: To compare bilateral aspherical toric with bilateral aspherical control intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients with cataract and corneal astigmatism. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter, hospital-based, randomized clinical trial was conducted. The participants included 86 individuals with bilateral cataract and bilateral corneal astigmatism of at least 1.25 diopters (D) who were randomized to receive either bilateral toric (n = 41) or bilateral control (n = 45) IOL implantation.
INTERVENTIONS: Bilateral implantation of an aspherical toric IOL or an aspherical control IOL. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Spectacle independency for distance vision, uncorrected distance visual acuity, refractive astigmatism, contrast sensitivity, wavefront aberrations, and refractive error-related quality-of-life questionnaire.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, mean (SD) corneal astigmatism was 2.02 (0.95) D and 2.00 (0.84) D in the toric and control groups, respectively. Four patients (5%) were lost to follow-up. At 6 months postoperatively, 26 (70%) of the patients in the toric group achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better compared with 14 (31%) in the control group (P < .001; odds ratio, 5.23; 95% CI, 2.03-13.48). Spectacle independency for distance vision was achieved in 31 patients (84%) in the toric group compared with 14 patients (31%) in the control group (P < .001; odds ratio, 11.44; 95% CI, 3.89- 33.63). Mean refractive astigmatism was -0.77 (0.52) D and -1.89 D (1.00) D, respectively. Vector analysis of toric IOLs showed a mean magnitude of error of +0.38 D, indicative of overcorrection. No significant differences were found in contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, or refractive error-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with cataract and corneal astigmatism, bilateral toric IOL implantation results in a higher spectacle independency for distance vision compared with bilateral control IOL implantation. No significant differences were identified in contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, or refractive error-related quality of life following both treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01075542.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25256624     DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  9 in total

1.  Effect of two different preoperative calculation schemes on visual outcomes of patients after toric intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Xuewen Yu; Jingwen Wang; Xueqi Lin; Dejian Xu; Shuang Ni; Siting Sheng; Wen Xu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 2.029

2.  Investigation of a real-time location system of corneal astigmatic axis.

Authors:  Jian-Guo Zhao; An-Peng Pan; Ke Zheng; A-Yong Yu
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-09-14

Review 3.  Global prevalence and economic and humanistic burden of astigmatism in cataract patients: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  David F Anderson; Mukesh Dhariwal; Christine Bouchet; Michael S Keith
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-06

4.  Comparison of visual performance of toric vs non-toric intraocular lenses with same material.

Authors:  Tomofusa Yamauchi; Hitoshi Tabuchi; Kosuke Takase; Zaigen Ohara; Hitoshi Imamura; Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-01

5.  Rotation Characteristics of Three Toric Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Brent A Kramer; David R Hardten; John P Berdahl
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-16

6.  Rotational stability and clinical outcomes of a new one piece toric intraocular lens with anchor-wing haptics.

Authors:  Iichiro Sugita; Tomoichiro Ogawa; Kazuo Ichikawa; Takahide Okita; Kazuno Negishi; Tadashi Nakano; Hiroshi Tsuneoka
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Long-term changes in the refractive effect of a toric intraocular lens on astigmatism correction.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Motoaki Yoshida; Shunsuke Hayashi; Akira Hirata
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Impact of Material and Lens Design on Repositioning Surgery of Toric Intraocular Lenses: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Changping Yang; Yan Yin; Linlin Liu; Hui Wang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Correction of pre-existing astigmatism with phacoemulsification using toric intraocular lens versus spherical intraocular lens and wave front guided surface ablation.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Shehawy; Ahmed El-Massry; Mohamed Sameh El-Shorbagy; Mohamed Atef; Moataz Sabry
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.209

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.