| Literature DB >> 25254046 |
Lin Ding1, Congcong Wang2, Heliang Ma1, Yuling Tian1, Yong Lu1, Shuguang Pang1.
Abstract
Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between serum vitamin D and insulin resistance in Chinese subjects without diabetes mellitus. Methods. Serum 25(OH)D was measured in 897 individuals with normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) were conducted to exclude cases with diabetes, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Metabolic parameters were measured and compared between the highest and lowest 25(OH)D quartiles. The relationship between serum 25(OH)D and homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was analyzed. Results. Indexes, such as HOMA-IR, FINS, and SBP, were negatively correlated with serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Compared with the lowest quartile, individuals in the highest group had decreased Lg (HOMA-IR), Lg (FINS), and SBP. Pearson correlation analyses showed that serum 25(OH)D was negatively associated with age, BMI, Lg (HOMA-IR), and Lg (FINS). Multivariate linear regression analysis confirmed the negative correlation of Lg (HOMA-IR) and 25(OH)D. Conclusions. This study showed that serum 25(OH)D could be regarded as an independent predictor of insulin resistance for subjects without diabetes mellitus in China. Adequate vitamin D supplementation may improve multiple metabolic disturbances.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25254046 PMCID: PMC4164467 DOI: 10.1155/2014/870235
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 3.257
Characteristics of the subjects by quartile categories of serum 25(OH)D.
| 25(OH)D | ||
|---|---|---|
| The highest quartile | The lowest quartile | |
| Cases | 225 | 224 |
| Sex (male/female) | 180/45 | 149/75 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 24.47 ± 3.29 | 25.32 ± 2.78 |
| Age (y) | 45.72 ± 7.10 | 51.75 ± 6.12 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 5.58 ± 0.57 | 5.59 ± 0.49 |
| Lg (HOMA-IR) | 0.42 ± 0.29 | 0.61 ± 0.31** |
| LgFINS (mIU/L) | 1.03 ± 0.28 | 1.21 ± 0.30** |
| SBP (mmHg) | 128.72 ± 1.53 | 134.70 ± 1.61** |
| DBP (mmHg) | 84.96 ± 0.95 | 81.69 ± 1.11 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.76 ± 0.09 | 2.01 ± 0.14 |
| TCH (mmol/L) | 5.40 ± 0.08 | 5.64 ± 0.09 |
| HDLC(mmol/L) | 1.22 ± 0.27 | 1.24 ± 0.28 |
| LDLC (mmol/L) | 3.34 ± 0.82 | 3.35 ± 0.85 |
∗∗ indicates P < 0.01, compared with the highest quartile.
The correlation and regression analyses of Lg (vitamin D).
| Pearson correlation | Stepwise regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Sex | 0.20 | 0.000 | 0.140 | 0.001 |
| Age | −0.27 | 0.000 | −0.248 | 0.000 |
| BMI | −0.11 | 0.008 | −0.130 | 0.002 |
| SBP | −0.11 | 0.007 | −0.010 | 0.820 |
| DBP | −0.10 | 0.018 | −0.009 | 0.845 |
| Lg (HOMA-IR) | −0.18 | 0.000 | −0.183 | 0.000 |
| lgFINS | −0.19 | 0.000 | 0.128 | 0.657 |
The variables entering into the multivariate linear regression equation.
| Variables | Partial regression coefficient ( | Standardized partial regression coefficient ( | Standard error |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 1.166 | 0.071 | 16.362 | 0.000 | |
| Sex | 0.054 | 0.140 | 0.001 | 3.441 | 0.001 |
| Age | −0.006 | −0.248 | 0.016 | −6.252 | 0.000 |
| BMI | 0.007 | −0.130 | 0.002 | −3.059 | 0.002 |
| Lg (HOMA-IR) | −0.104 | −0.183 | 0.023 | −4.505 | 0.000 |
Lg 25(OH)D as dependent variable.