Literature DB >> 25253944

Improving the outcomes in oncological colorectal surgery.

Jeroen L A van Vugt1, Kostan W Reisinger1, Joep P M Derikx1, Djamila Boerma1, Jan H M B Stoot1.   

Abstract

During the last several decades, colorectal cancer surgery has experienced some major perioperative improvements. Preoperative risk-assessment of nutrition, frailty, and sarcopenia followed by interventions for patient optimization or an adapted surgical strategy, contributed to improved postoperative outcomes. Enhanced recovery programs or fast-track surgery also resulted in reduced length of hospital stay and overall complications without affecting patient safety. After an initially indecisive start due to uncertainty about oncological safety, the most significant improvement in intraoperative care was the introduction of laparoscopy. Laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer is associated with better short-term outcomes, whereas long-term outcomes regarding survival and recurrence rates are comparable. Nevertheless, long-term results in rectal surgery remain to be seen. Early recognition of anastomotic leakage remains a challenge, though multiple improvements have allowed better management of this complication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Audits; Colorectal surgery; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Frailty; Laparoscopic surgery; Nutritional status; Sarcopenia

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25253944      PMCID: PMC4168077          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  139 in total

Review 1.  Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery.

Authors:  E C Jesus; A Karliczek; D Matos; A A Castro; A N Atallah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

2.  Anastomotic leakage as an outcome measure for quality of colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  H S Snijders; D Henneman; N L van Leersum; M ten Berge; M Fiocco; T M Karsten; K Havenga; T Wiggers; J W Dekker; R A E M Tollenaar; M W J M Wouters
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Evaluation of nutritional screening tools for patients scheduled for cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Vladimir V Lomivorotov; Sergey M Efremov; Vladimir A Boboshko; Dmitry A Nikolaev; Pavel E Vedernikov; Vladimir N Lomivorotov; Alexander M Karaskov
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 8.  Peritoneal fluid cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases as early markers of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Cini; A Wolthuis; A D'Hoore
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Compromised visceral circulation does not affect the outcome of colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Verena N N Kornmann; Michiel H van Werkum; Thomas L Bollen; Bert van Ramshorst; Djamila Boerma
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Simon S M Ng; Ka Lau Leung; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Jimmy C M Li; Anthony Y B Teoh; Wing Wa Leung
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  13 in total

1.  Determining the Safety and Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Major Oncologic Surgery: An Institutional NSQIP Analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca K Marcus; Heather A Lillemoe; David C Rice; Gabriel Mena; Brian K Bednarski; Barbra B Speer; Pedro T Ramirez; Javier D Lasala; Neema Navai; Wendell H Williams; Bradford J Kim; Rachel K Voss; Vijaya N Gottumukkala; Thomas A Aloia
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Reoperative Abdomen or Pelvis.

Authors:  Amanda Feigel; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

3.  Short-term outcomes and benefits of ERAS program in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a case-matched study compared to conventional care.

Authors:  Patricia Tejedor; Carlos Pastor; Santiago Gonzalez-Ayora; Mario Ortega-Lopez; Hector Guadalajara; Damian Garcia-Olmo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Markers of Perioperative Bowel Complications in Colorectal Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Radomír Hyšpler; Alena Tichá; Milan Kaška; Lenka Žaloudková; Lenka Plíšková; Eduard Havel; Zdeněk Zadák
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.434

5.  Modified protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery is beneficial for Chinese cancer patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Xiaxing Deng; Xi Cheng; Zhen Huo; Yuan Shi; Zhijian Jin; Haoran Feng; Yue Wang; Chenlei Wen; Hao Qian; Ren Zhao; Weihua Qiu; Baiyong Shen; Chenghong Peng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18

6.  Relationship between Parameters Linked to Surgery, Hospitalization and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  A Chirca; E Radu; D G Minca; R Costea
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2018-09

7.  Hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves colorectal anastomotic healing.

Authors:  G S A Boersema; Z Wu; L F Kroese; S Vennix; Y M Bastiaansen-Jenniskens; J W van Neck; K H Lam; G J Kleinrensink; J Jeekel; J F Lange
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Trends and Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer between 2004 and 2012- an Analysis using National Inpatient Database.

Authors:  Meng-Tse Gabriel Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Chia-Chun Wang; Chia-Na Chang; Shih-Hao Lee; Matthew Lee; Tzu-Chun Hsu; Chien-Chang Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Accelerated enhanced Recovery following Minimally Invasive colorectal cancer surgery (RecoverMI): a study protocol for a novel randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Brandee A Price; Brian K Bednarski; Y Nancy You; Meryna Manandhar; E Michelle Dean; Zeinab M Alawadi; B Bryce Speer; Vijaya Gottumukkala; Marla Weldon; Robert L Massey; Xuemei Wang; Wei Qiao; George J Chang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Laparoscopic Surgery Within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol Reduced Postoperative Ileus by Increasing Postoperative Treg Levels in Patients with Right-Side Colon Carcinoma.

Authors:  Honggang Wang; Yong Wang; Hailin Xing; Yaxing Zhou; Jie Zhao; Jianguo Jiang; Qinghong Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.