Literature DB >> 31041123

Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a screening tool: Influence of performance and symptom validity.

Brigid Waldron-Perrine1, Nicolette M Gabel1, Katharine Seagly1, A Zarina Kraal1, Percival Pangilinan1, Robert J Spencer1, Linas Bieliauskas1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) performance in a veteran traumatic brain injury (TBI) population, considering performance validity test (PVT) and symptom validity test (SVT) data, and explored associations of MoCA performance with neuropsychological test performance and self-reported distress.
METHODS: Of 198 consecutively referred veterans to a Veterans Administration TBI/Polytrauma Clinic, 117 were included in the final sample. The MoCA was administered as part of the evaluation. Commonly used measures of neuropsychological functioning and performance and symptom validity were also administered to aid in diagnosis.
RESULTS: Successively worse MoCA performances were associated with a greater number of PVT failures (ps < 0.05). Failure of both the SVT and at least 1 PVT yielded the lowest MoCA scores. Self-reported distress (both posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and neurobehavioral cognitive symptoms) was also related to MoCA performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Performance on the MoCA is influenced by task engagement and symptom validity. Causal inferences about neurologic and neurocognitive impairment, particularly in the context of mild TBI, wherein the natural course of recovery is well known, should therefore be made cautiously when such inferences are based heavily on MoCA scores. Neuropsychologists are well versed in the assessment of performance and symptom validity and thus may be well suited to explore the influences of abnormal performances on cognitive screening.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31041123      PMCID: PMC6461423          DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract        ISSN: 2163-0402


  28 in total

1.  "Diagnosis Threat": the effect of negative expectations on cognitive performance in head injury.

Authors:  Julie A Suhr; John Gunstad
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.475

2.  Base rates of post-concussional symptoms.

Authors:  W D Gouvier; M Uddo-Crane; L M Brown
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Classification accuracy of the test of memory malingering in traumatic brain injury: results of a known-groups analysis.

Authors:  Kevin W Greve; Kevin J Bianchini; Bridget M Doane
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.475

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of various digit span scores in the detection of suspect effort.

Authors:  Talin Babikian; Kyle Brauer Boone; Po Lu; Ginger Arnold
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting.

Authors:  Tasha Smith; Nadia Gildeh; Clive Holmes
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.356

6.  Examining the Test Of Memory Malingering Trial 1 and Word Memory Test Immediate Recognition as screening tools for insufficient effort.

Authors:  Lyndsey Bauer; Sid E O'Bryant; Julie K Lynch; Robert J McCaffrey; Jerid M Fisher
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2007-09

7.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  The Distress and Risk Assessment Method. A simple patient classification to identify distress and evaluate the risk of poor outcome.

Authors:  C J Main; P L Wood; S Hollis; C C Spanswick; G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Exaggerated pain report in litigants with malingered neurocognitive dysfunction.

Authors:  Glenn J Larrabee
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  Neuropsychological complaint base rates of 170 personal injury claimants.

Authors:  P R Lees-Haley; R S Brown
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.813

View more
  2 in total

1.  Two-Step Resilience-Oriented Intervention for Veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Dmytro Assonov
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2021-10

2.  Astrocytic IGF-1 and IGF-1R Orchestrate Mitophagy in Traumatic Brain Injury via Exosomal miR-let-7e.

Authors:  Ren Dabin; Chen Wei; Shu Liang; Cao Ke; Wang Zhihan; Zheng Ping
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 7.310

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.