Literature DB >> 24528190

Examination of performance validity test failure in relation to number of tests administered.

Jeremy J Davis1, Scott R Millis.   

Abstract

This study examined the relationship among performance validity test (PVT) failure, number of PVTs administered, and participant characteristics including demographic, diagnostic, functional, and contextual factors in a clinical sample (N = 158) of outpatient physiatry referrals. The number of PVTs failed and the number administered showed a small non-significant correlation (rs = .13, p = .10). Participant characteristics showed associations with PVT failure consistent with prior research. A negative binomial regression model was fitted using number of PVTs failed as outcome and age, education, number of PVTs administered, clinical versus medico-legal context, and functional status as predictors. Although education and functional status were significant predictors of number of PVTs failed, the number of PVTs administered was not. A second analytic approach focused on observed false positive rates in a neurologic no-incentive (NNI) sample subset (n = 87). In contrast to a recent proposal based on statistical simulation, observed false positive rates were lower than predicted rates in NNI participants administered six, seven, or eight PVTs using a two-PVT failure cutoff. These results are interpreted as mitigating concerns that increased PVT failure is necessarily the outcome of increased PVT administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24528190     DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2014.884633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1385-4046            Impact factor:   3.535


  5 in total

1.  The dangers of failing one or more performance validity tests in individuals claiming mild traumatic brain injury-related postconcussive symptoms.

Authors:  Daniel A Proto; Nicholas J Pastorek; Brian I Miller; Jennifer M Romesser; Anita H Sim; John F Linck
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.813

2.  False-Positive Error Rates for Reliable Digit Span and Auditory Verbal Learning Test Performance Validity Measures in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Alzheimer Disease.

Authors:  David W Loring; Felicia C Goldstein; Chuqing Chen; Daniel L Drane; James J Lah; Liping Zhao; Glenn J Larrabee
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Benefits and challenges of using logistic regression to assess neuropsychological performance validity: Evidence from a simulation study.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Robert J Spencer
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.373

4.  Cumulative false positive rates given multiple performance validity tests: commentary on Davis and Millis (2014) and Larrabee (2014).

Authors:  Robert M Bilder; Catherine A Sugar; Gerhard S Hellemann
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Performance validity in older adults: Observed versus predicted false positive rates in relation to number of tests administered.

Authors:  Jeremy J Davis
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 2.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.