Literature DB >> 25252133

In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy?

Simpa S Salami1, Eran Ben-Levi, Oksana Yaskiv, Laura Ryniker, Baris Turkbey, Louis R Kavoussi, Robert Villani, Ardeshir R Rastinehad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in predicting prostate cancer on repeat biopsy; and to compare the cancer detection rates (CDRs) of MRI/transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided biopsy with standard 12-core biopsy in men with at least one previous negative biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled men with elevated or rising PSA levels and/or abnormal digital rectal examination into our MRI/TRUS fusion-guided prostate biopsy trial. Participants underwent a 3 T mpMRI with an endorectal coil. Three radiologists graded all suspicious lesions on a 5-point Likert scale. MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsies of suspicious prostate lesions and standard TRUS-guided 12-core biopsies were performed. Analysis of 140 eligible men with at least one previous negative biopsy was performed. We calculated CDRs and estimated area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of mpMRI in predicting any cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer.
RESULTS: The overall CDR was 65.0% (91/140). Higher level of suspicion on mpMRI was significantly associated with prostate cancer detection (P < 0.001) with an AUC of 0.744 compared with 0.653 and 0.680 for PSA level and PSA density, respectively. The CDRs of MRI/TRUS fusion-guided and standard 12-core biopsy were 52.1% (73/140) and 48.6% (68/140), respectively (P = 0.435). However, fusion biopsy was more likely to detect clinically significant prostate cancer when compared with the 12-core biopsy (47.9% vs 30.7%; P < 0.001). Of the cancers missed by 12-core biopsy, 20.9% (19/91) were clinically significant. Most cancers missed by 12-core biopsy (69.6%) were located in the anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone. Using a fusion-biopsy-only approach in men with an MRI suspicion score of ≥4 would have missed only 3.5% of clinically significant prostate cancers.
CONCLUSIONS: Using mpMRI and subsequent MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy platform may improve detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in men with previous negative biopsies. Addition of a 12-core biopsy may be needed to avoid missing some clinically significant prostate cancers.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  false-negative prostate biopsy; negative prostate biopsy; prostate cancer screening; prostate fusion biopsy; prostate imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25252133     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  39 in total

Review 1.  Targeted prostate biopsy and MR-guided therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  David A Woodrum; Akira Kawashima; Krzysztof R Gorny; Lance A Mynderse
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Arvin K George; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Addressing the need for repeat prostate biopsy: new technology and approaches.

Authors:  Michael L Blute; E Jason Abel; Tracy M Downs; Frederick Kelcz; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy: are two biopsy cores per MRI-lesion required?

Authors:  L Schimmöller; M Quentin; D Blondin; F Dietzel; A Hiester; C Schleich; C Thomas; R Rabenalt; H E Gabbert; P Albers; G Antoch; C Arsov
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy.

Authors:  Hannes Cash; Andreas Maxeiner; Carsten Stephan; Thomas Fischer; Tahir Durmus; Josephine Holzmann; Patrick Asbach; Matthias Haas; Stefan Hinz; Jörg Neymeyer; Kurt Miller; Karsten Günzel; Carsten Kempkensteffen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Omission of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy from the MRI targeted approach in men with previous negative prostate biopsy might still be premature.

Authors:  Ivo G Schoots
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-05

Review 7.  MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy of Native and Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  David A Woodrum; Krzysztof R Gorny; Bernadette Greenwood; Lance A Mynderse
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.

Authors:  Akhil Muthigi; Arvin K George; Abhinav Sidana; Michael Kongnyuy; Richard Simon; Vanessa Moreno; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Anna M Brown; Sandeep Sankineni; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Biologic Significance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Invisibility in Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Simpa S Salami; Jeremy B Kaplan; Srinivas Nallandhighal; Mandeep Takhar; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Matthew Lee; Junhee Yoon; Daniel H Hovelson; Komal R Plouffe; Samuel D Kaffenberger; Edward M Schaeffer; R Jeffrey Karnes; Tamara L Lotan; Todd M Morgan; Arvin K George; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Matthew S Davenport; Sungyong You; Scott A Tomlins; Nicole E Curci; Hyung L Kim; Daniel E Spratt; Aaron M Udager; Ganesh S Palapattu
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.