Literature DB >> 12818982

Sex-based ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size selection: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized, paralyzed male and female adult patients.

Shinichi Kihara1, Joseph Brimacombe.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We compared the Size 4 and 5 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in men and the Size 3 and 4, and 4 and 5 PLMA in women in terms of 1) ease of insertion, 2) oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), 3) ease of ventilation at a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg, 4) gas exchange, 5) location of gas leak, 6) anatomic position of the airway and drain tube, and 7) mucosal injury. Thirty male and 60 female (ASA physical status I-II; 18-80 yr old) anesthetized, paralyzed patients were studied in a crossover fashion in three equal-sized groups. PLMA insertion was performed by a single experienced operator by using digital manipulation. In male patients comparing the Size 4 and 5, OLP was higher (P = 0.0002) and leak fraction lower (P = 0.03) for the Size 5, but the number of insertion attempts, insertion time, mucosal injury, anatomic position, gas exchange, and location of gas leak were similar. In female patients comparing the Size 4 and 5 PLMA, OLP was higher for the Size 5 (P < 0.0001), but the number of insertion attempts was fewer (P = 0.02), insertion time was quicker (P = 0.02), and there was less mucosal injury (P = 0.01) with the Size 4. There were no differences in anatomic position, gas exchange, or location of gas leak. In female patients comparing the Size 3 and 4 PLMA, OLP was higher (P = 0.0005) and leak fraction was lower (P = 0.03) for the Size 4, but the number of insertion attempts, insertion time, mucosal injury, anatomic position, gas exchange, and location of gas leak were similar. There were no episodes of failed oxygenation, failed ventilation, or gastric insufflation. We conclude that if size is selected by sex, the Size 4 PLMA is preferable for women and the Size 5 PLMA for men. IMPLICATIONS: When sex is used to select the appropriate size of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, the Size 4 ProSeal is preferable for women and the Size 5 ProSeal for men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12818982     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000068824.86773.b0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the effects of room air and N2O + O2 used for ProSeal LMA cuff inflation on cuff pressure and oropharyngeal structure.

Authors:  Murat Tekin; Ismail Kati; Yakup Tomak; Koksal Yuca
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Comparison of the size 3 and size 4 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, non-paralyzed women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mi-Hyun Kim; Jung-Won Hwang; Eun-Sung Kim; Sung-Hee Han; Young-Tae Jeon; Sun-Mi Lee
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Mao-Kai Chen; Hung-Te Hsu; I-Cheng Lu; Chih-Kai Shih; Ya-Chun Shen; Kuang-Yi Tseng; Kuang-I Cheng
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Incidence and risk factors for postoperative lingual neuropraxia following airway instrumentation: A retrospective matched case-control study.

Authors:  Yi-Kai Su; Jen-Hung Wang; Shiu-Ying Hsieh; Xiu-Zhu Liu; Chen-Fuh Lam; Shian-Che Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison and evaluation of single-use LMA supreme versus the reusable proseal LMA in paralyzed patients undergoing surgery with controlled ventilation.

Authors:  Suvidha Sood; Shikha Chahar; Anil Thakur; Madhu Gupta; Anupriya Saxena; Shalini Subramanian
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.