Literature DB >> 20077171

Insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the 90 degrees rotation technique.

Young-Tae Jeon1, Hyo Seok Na, Sang-Hyun Park, Ah-Young Oh, Hee-Pyoung Park, Mi-Ja Yun, Jin Hee Kim, Jung-Won Hwang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The 90 degrees rotation technique for inserting the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in anesthetized paralyzed patients was compared with the index finger insertion technique.
METHODS: One hundred twenty Asian adult patients were randomly allocated to either a standard technique group or a rotation technique group. A PLMA size 4 was used for women and size 5 was used for men. In the standard technique group (n = 60), the PLMA was inserted using the index finger. In the rotation technique group (n = 60), the entire cuff of the PLMA was placed in the patient's mouth in a midline approach without finger insertion, rotated 90 degrees counter clockwise around the patient's tongue, advanced and then rotated back until resistance was felt. The primary outcome was success at first insertion. Secondary outcome measures were insertion time and complications.
RESULTS: The success rate at first insertion was greater for the rotation technique group than for the standard technique group (100% vs 83%, respectively; P = 0.003), and less time was required (11 +/- 3 sec vs 19 +/- 16 sec, respectively; P = 0.03). The incidence of postoperative sore throat was lower for the rotation technique group than for the standard technique group (12% vs 33%, respectively; P = 0.009), and blood staining on the PLMA was less (8% vs 40%, respectively; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The 90 degrees rotation technique for inserting the PLMA is more successful than the standard index finger insertion technique. It is associated with fewer side effects, such as blood on the PLMA and sore throat, which suggests it causes less pharyngeal trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20077171     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-009-9241-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  7 in total

1.  Initial experience of the i-gel supraglottic airway by the residents in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Yukako Abukawa; Koichi Hiroki; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Supraglottic Airway Devices: the Search for the Best Insertion Technique or the Time to Change Our Point of View?

Authors:  Massimiliano Sorbello; Flavia Petrini
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-04-01

3.  A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial for the Comparison of Two Techniques for the Insertion of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Adults-Index Finger Insertion Technique versus 90° Rotation Technique.

Authors:  Pavan V Dhulkhed; Sunil V Khyadi; Parbati B Jamale; Vithal K Dhulkhed
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-04-01

4.  Comparison of the size 3 and size 4 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, non-paralyzed women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mi-Hyun Kim; Jung-Won Hwang; Eun-Sung Kim; Sung-Hee Han; Young-Tae Jeon; Sun-Mi Lee
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion.

Authors:  Go Wun Kim; Jong Yeop Kim; Soo Jin Kim; Yeo Rae Moon; Eun Jeong Park; Sung Yong Park
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 6.  Standard versus Rotation Technique for Insertion of Supraglottic Airway Devices: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jin Ha Park; Jong Seok Lee; Sang Beom Nam; Jin Wu Ju; Min Soo Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient.

Authors:  J Adam Law; Laura V Duggan; Mathieu Asselin; Paul Baker; Edward Crosby; Andrew Downey; Orlando R Hung; Philip M Jones; François Lemay; Rudiger Noppens; Matteo Parotto; Roanne Preston; Nick Sowers; Kathryn Sparrow; Timothy P Turkstra; David T Wong; George Kovacs
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.063

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.