Literature DB >> 25248922

Risk factors for anterior glenohumeral instability.

Brett D Owens1, Scot E Campbell2, Kenneth L Cameron3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While anterior glenohumeral instability has been shown to be common in young athletes, the risk factors for injury are poorly understood. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for anterior shoulder instability in a high-risk cohort. The hypothesis was that specific baseline factors would be associated with the subsequent risk of injury. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in which 714 young athletes were followed from June 2006 through May 2010. Baseline assessments included a subjective history of instability, physical examination by a sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon, range of motion, strength with a handheld dynamometer, and bilateral noncontrast shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A musculoskeletal radiologist measured glenoid version, glenoid height, glenoid width, glenoid index (height-to-width ratio), glenoid depth, rotator interval (RI) height, RI width, RI area, RI index, and the coracohumeral interval. Subjects were followed to document all acute anterior shoulder instability events during the 4-year follow-up period. The time to anterior shoulder instability event during the follow-up period was the primary outcome of interest. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: Complete data were available for 714 subjects. During the 4-year surveillance period, there were 39 anterior instability events documented at a mean of 285 days. While we controlled for covariates, significant risk factors of physical examination were as follows: apprehension sign (hazard ratio [HR], 2.96; 95% CI, 1.48-5.90; P = .002) and relocation sign (HR, 4.83; 95% CI, 1.75-13.33; P = .002). Baseline range of motion and strength measures were not associated with subsequent injury. Significant anatomic risk factors on MRI measurement were glenoid index (HR, 8.12; 95% CI, 1.07-61.72; P = .043) and the coracohumeral interval (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.08-1.34; P = .001).
CONCLUSION: This prospective cohort study revealed significant risk factors for shoulder instability in this high-risk population. Physical examination findings of apprehension and relocation were significant while controlling for history of injury. The anatomic variables of significance were not surprising-tall and thin glenoids were at higher risk compared with short and wide glenoids, and the risk of instability increased by 20% for every 1-mm increase in coracohumeral distance.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Keywords:  epidemiology; glenoid labrum; shoulder instability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25248922     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514551149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  13 in total

1.  Coracoacromial morphology: a contributor to recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability?

Authors:  Matthijs Jacxsens; Shireen Y Elhabian; Sarah E Brady; Peter N Chalmers; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 2.  Clinical Evaluation and Physical Exam Findings in Patients with Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Vincent A Lizzio; Fabien Meta; Mohsin Fidai; Eric C Makhni
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

3.  Glenoid bony morphology along long diameter is associated with the occurrence of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation: a case-control study based on three-dimensional CT measurements.

Authors:  Haitao Guan; Boyu Zhang; Zhipeng Ye; Xiangtian Deng; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  MRI Allows Accurate Measurement of Glenoid Bone Loss.

Authors:  Mirco Sgroi; Hashuka Huzurudin; Marius Ludwig; Timo Zippelius; Heiko Reichel; Thomas Kappe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Arthroscopic treatment of glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Ettore Taverna; Guido Garavaglia; Henri Ufenast; Riccardo D'Ambrosi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Thinking outside the glenohumeral box: Hierarchical shape variation of the periarticular anatomy of the scapula using statistical shape modeling.

Authors:  Matthijs Jacxsens; Shireen Y Elhabian; Sarah E Brady; Peter N Chalmers; Andreas M Mueller; Robert Z Tashjian; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  The Neural Correlates of Shoulder Apprehension: A Functional MRI Study.

Authors:  Hitoshi Shitara; Daisuke Shimoyama; Tsuyoshi Sasaki; Noritaka Hamano; Tsuyoshi Ichinose; Atsushi Yamamoto; Tsutomu Kobayashi; Toshihisa Osawa; Haku Iizuka; Takashi Hanakawa; Yoshito Tsushima; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Comprehensive Examination of the Athlete's Shoulder.

Authors:  Eric J Cotter; Charles P Hannon; David Christian; Rachel M Frank; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Predictors for Surgery in Shoulder Instability: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the FEDS System.

Authors:  George F Lebus; Martin B Raynor; Samuel K Nwosu; Emily Wagstrom; Sunil S Jani; James L Carey; Carolyn M Hettrich; Charles L Cox; John E Kuhn
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-10-08

10.  Increased Glenoid Index as a Risk Factor for Pediatric and Adolescent Anterior Glenohumeral Dislocation: An MRI-Based, Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Joseph L Yellin; Peter D Fabricant; Jason B Anari; Alexander L Neuwirth; Theodore J Ganley; Nancy A Chauvin; John T Lawrence
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.