Literature DB >> 2524889

Studies of the Modified Somatic Perceptions Questionnaire (MSPQ) in patients with back pain. Psychometric and predictive properties.

R A Deyo1, N E Walsh, L S Schoenfeld, S Ramamurthy.   

Abstract

The Modified Somatic Perceptions Questionnaire (MSPQ) was designed to measure heightened somatic awareness among patients with chronic pain. It was hoped that this questionnaire would help predict therapeutic responses for back pain patients. The reliability, validity, and predictive characteristics of this scale were tested among 97 patients with chronic low-back pain enrolled in a clinical trial of transcutaneous nerve stimulation and stretching exercises. Internal consistency was good (alpha = 0.78), and correlations with the Zung depression scale and certain MMPI scales were significant. Correlations with a baseline functional scale (the Sickness Impact Profile) were stronger than those with the MMPI. Unfortunately, the MSPQ did not correlate with functional outcomes, and was only weakly associated with pain outcomes. Thus, the MSPQ appears to be reliable and valid, but the somatic perceptions it measures may have little relation to patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2524889     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198905000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Preoperative and surgical factors associated with postoperative intensive care unit admission following operative treatment for degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Authors:  Harrison F Kay; Silky Chotai; Joseph B Wick; David P Stonko; Matthew J McGirt; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Association between patient-reported measures of psychological distress and patient satisfaction scores after spine surgery.

Authors:  A M Abtahi; D S Brodke; B D Lawrence; C Zhang; W R Spiker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Responsiveness of depression and its influence on surgical outcomes of lumbar degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Asdrubal Falavigna; Orlando Righesso; Alisson Roberto Teles; Lucas Piccoli Conzati; Julia Bertholdo Bossardi; Pedro Guarise da Silva; Joseph S Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-05-22

4.  One-year Patient-reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Do Not Correlate With Mild to Moderate Psychological Distress.

Authors:  Michael Q Potter; James D Wylie; Erin K Granger; Patrick E Greis; Robert T Burks; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Psychological Assessment Tools Utilized in Sports Injury Treatment Outcomes Research: A Review.

Authors:  Joshua S Everhart; Kristie Harris; Aaron Chafitz; James C Kirven; Moneer Abouljoud; Steven Schiele; Charles Emery; David C Flanigan
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Associations between low back pain and depression and somatization in a Canadian emerging adult population.

Authors:  David Robertson; Dinesh Kumbhare; Paul Nolet; John Srbely; Genevieve Newton
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2017-08

7.  Primary care assessment instruments for patients at risk of, or with, persistent pain: opportunistic findings from a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Karen Grimmer-Somers; Saravana Kumar; Nic Vipond; Gillian Hall
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2009-07-30

8.  Psychologic distress reduces preoperative self-assessment scores in femoroacetabular impingement patients.

Authors:  Michael Q Potter; James D Wylie; Grant S Sun; James T Beckmann; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Psychological distress negatively affects self-assessment of shoulder function in patients with rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Michael Q Potter; James D Wylie; Patrick E Greis; Robert T Burks; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A review and critique of assessment instruments for patients with persistent pain.

Authors:  Karen Grimmer-Somers; Nic Vipond; Saravana Kumar; Gillian Hall
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.