Literature DB >> 25080266

Psychological distress negatively affects self-assessment of shoulder function in patients with rotator cuff tears.

Michael Q Potter1, James D Wylie, Patrick E Greis, Robert T Burks, Robert Z Tashjian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In many areas of orthopaedics, patients with greater levels of psychological distress report inferior self-assessments of pain and function. This effect can lead to lower-than-expected baseline scores on common patient-reported outcome scales, even those not traditionally considered to have a psychological component. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This study attempts to answer the following questions: (1) Are higher levels of psychological distress associated with clinically important differences in baseline scores on the VAS for pain, the Simple Shoulder Test, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? (2) Does psychological distress remain a negative predictor of baseline shoulder scores when other clinical variables are controlled?
METHODS: Eighty-five patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were prospectively enrolled. Psychological distress was quantified using the Distress Risk Assessment Method questionnaire. Patients completed baseline self-assessments including the VAS for pain, the Simple Shoulder Test, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Age, sex, BMI, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, tear size, and tear retraction were recorded for each patient. Bivariate correlations and multivariate regression models were used to assess the effect of psychological distress on patient self-assessment of shoulder pain and function.
RESULTS: Distressed patients reported higher baseline VAS scores (6.7 [95% CI, 4.4-9.0] versus 2.9 [95% CI, 2.3-3.6], p = 0.001) and lower baseline Simple Shoulder Test (3.7 [95% CI, 2.9-4.5] versus 5.7 [95% CI 5.0-6.4], p = 0.001) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (39 [95% CI, 34-45] versus 58 [95% CI, 53-63], p < 0.001). Distress remained associated with higher VAS scores (p = 0.001) and lower Simple Shoulder Test (p < 0.001) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (p < 0.001) when age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, smoking status, tear size, and tear retraction were controlled.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of psychological distress are associated with inferior baseline patient self-assessment of shoulder pain and function using the VAS, the Simple Shoulder Test, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Longitudinal followup is warranted to clarify the relationship between distress and self-perceived disability and the effect of distress on postoperative outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25080266      PMCID: PMC4397768          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3833-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  30 in total

1.  Clinical predictors of psychological distress in patients presenting for evaluation of a spinal disorder.

Authors:  Michael D Daubs; Man Hung; Jacob R Adams; Alpesh A Patel; Brandon D Lawrence; Ashley M Neese; Darrel S Brodke
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: a prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain.

Authors:  Eugene J Carragee; Todd F Alamin; Jonothan L Miller; John M Carragee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability.

Authors:  R J Gatchel; P B Polatin; T G Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Psychological factors associated with idiopathic arm pain.

Authors:  David Ring; John Kadzielski; Leah Malhotra; Sang-Gil P Lee; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome.

Authors:  P M Trief; W Grant; B Fredrickson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Emotional health predicts pain and function after fusion: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Paula M Trief; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Bruce E Fredrickson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The Distress and Risk Assessment Method. A simple patient classification to identify distress and evaluate the risk of poor outcome.

Authors:  C J Main; P L Wood; S Hollis; C C Spanswick; G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Effect of medical comorbidity on self-assessed pain, function, and general health status after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; R Frank Henn; Lana Kang; Andrew Green
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Studies of the Modified Somatic Perceptions Questionnaire (MSPQ) in patients with back pain. Psychometric and predictive properties.

Authors:  R A Deyo; N E Walsh; L S Schoenfeld; S Ramamurthy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery.

Authors:  A R Block; D D Ohnmeiss; R D Guyer; R F Rashbaum; S H Hochschuler
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  27 in total

1.  The effect of Medicaid payer status on patient outcomes following repair of massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  V Sabesan; J Whaley; G Petersen-Fitts; A Sherwood; M Sweet; D J L Lima; D Malone
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-11-28

2.  Treatment of irreparable cuff tears with smoothing of the humeroscapular motion interface without acromioplasty.

Authors:  Jason E Hsu; Jacob Gorbaty; Robert Lucas; Stacy M Russ; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Increased Health Care Costs and Opioid Use in Patients with Anxiety and Depression Undergoing Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Kevin J Cronin; Scott D Mair; Greg S Hawk; Katherine L Thompson; Carolyn M Hettrich; Cale A Jacobs
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Associations of Preoperative Patient Mental Health and Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics With Baseline Pain, Function, and Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Rotator Cuff Repairs.

Authors:  Sambit Sahoo; Eric T Ricchetti; Alexander Zajichek; Peter J Evans; Lutul D Farrow; Brett W McCoy; Morgan H Jones; Anthony A Miniaci; Vani J Sabesan; Mark S Schickendantz; William H Seitz; Kurt P Spindler; Kim L Stearns; Greg Strnad; Alparslan Turan; Vahid Entezari; Peter B Imrey; Joseph P Iannotti; Kathleen A Derwin
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  One-year Patient-reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Do Not Correlate With Mild to Moderate Psychological Distress.

Authors:  Michael Q Potter; James D Wylie; Erin K Granger; Patrick E Greis; Robert T Burks; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Are Psychologic Factors Associated With Shoulder Scores After Rotator Cuff Surgery?

Authors:  Alison M Thorpe; Peter B O'Sullivan; Tim Mitchell; Mark Hurworth; Jonathan Spencer; Grant Booth; Sven Goebel; Paul Khoo; Aaron Tay; Anne Smith
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Are Psychosocial Factors Associated With Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Amee L Seitz; Erica Pelote; Kristin R Archer; Nitin B Jain
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Factors associated with choice for surgery in newly symptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears: a prospective cohort evaluation.

Authors:  Jay D Keener; Alexander W Aleem; Aaron M Chamberlain; Julianne Sefko; Karen Steger-May
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Associations of preoperative patient mental health status and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with baseline pain, function, and satisfaction in patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sambit Sahoo; Kathleen A Derwin; Alexander Zajichek; Vahid Entezari; Peter B Imrey; Joseph P Iannotti; Eric T Ricchetti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 10.  The influence of psychosocial factors on patient-reported outcome measures in rotator cuff tears pre- and post-surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicolò Panattoni; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Sergio De Salvatore; Nadia Saray Castro Castaneda; Laura Risi Ambrogioni; Michela Piredda; Maria Grazia De Marinis; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.