| Literature DB >> 33315932 |
Mathilde Stomp1, Serenella d'Ingeo1,2, Séverine Henry1, Clémence Lesimple1, Hugo Cousillas1, Martine Hausberger1.
Abstract
Assessing chronic pain is a challenge given its subjective dimension. In humans, resting state electroencephalography (EEG) is a promising tool although the results of various studies are contradictory. Spontaneous chronic pain is understudied in animals but could be of the highest interest for a comparative study. Riding horses show a very high prevalence of back disorders thought to be associated with chronic pain. Moreover, horses with known back problems show cognitive alterations, such as a lower attentional engagement. Therefore, we hypothesized that the individual EEG power profiles resting state (i.e. quiet standing) of different horses could reflect the state of their back, that we measured using static sEMG, a tool first promoted to assess lower back pain in human patients. Results show that 1) EEG profiles are highly stable at the intra-individual level, 2) horses with elevated back tension showed resting state EEG profiles characterized by more fast (beta and gamma) and less slow (theta and alpha) waves. The proportion of theta waves was particularly negatively correlated with muscular tension along the spine. Moreover, elevated back tension was positively correlated with the frequency of stereotypic behaviours (an "addictive- like" repetitive behavior) performed by the horses in their stall. Resting state quantitative EEG appears therefore as a very promising tool that may allow to assess individual subjective chronic pain experience, beyond more objective measures of tension. These results open new lines of research for a multi-species comparative approach and might reveal very important in the context of animal welfare.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33315932 PMCID: PMC7735639 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243970
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the individuals involved in the study.
| Individuals Pop.1 | Sex | Age | Individuals Pop. 2 | Sex | Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Stallion | 4 | G5 | Gelding | 9 |
| S2 | Stallion | 3 | G6 | Gelding | 14 |
| G1 | Gelding | 5 | G7 | Gelding | 11 |
| G2 | Gelding | 16 | G8 | Gelding | 11 |
| G3 | Gelding | 12 | G9 | Gelding | 9 |
| G4 | Gelding | 21 | M4 | Mare | 14 |
| M1 | Mare | 19 | M5 | Mare | 12 |
| M2 | Mare | 12 | M6 | Mare | 10 |
| M3 | Mare | 15 | M7 | Mare | 12 |
Fig 1(left) EEG headset used in the present study. (right) Example of 8 sec. electroencephalography (EEG) recordings of left (LH) and right (RH) hemispheres obtained with the EEG headset after removing artefacts in both horse populations (A- recreational horse; B riding school horse). LH wave for recreational horses are characteristic of slow waves.
Fig 3Correlations between the proportions of the different waves in the quantitative resting- state EEG in each hemisphere and sEMG measures along the spine.
1 median value of the spine muscular activity; 2 the asymmetry median value along the spine. Only significant correlations are shown.
Type, classification and description of recorded abnormal repetitive behaviours.
| SB/ARB behavioural description | Type |
|---|---|
| head tossing / nodding: vertical movements of head and neck | motor |
| striking with forelimb: horse hits the door or wall with one of its forelegs | motor |
| box walking: repetitive tracing a route within the stable | motor |
| cribbing / wind sucking: the horse grasps a fixed object with its incisors, pulls backwards and draws air into its oesophagus | oral |
| head movements (other than head tossing / nodding): movement of the head | motor |
| lip shivering: shivering of the lower lip | motor |
| repetitive displacement of the saddle support on the stall door | motor |
| tongue movements: movements of tongue, inside or outside its mouth | oral |
| repetitive biting: biting a given object in its environment | oral |
| repetitive licking: licking a given object in its environment | oral |
Individual EEG profiles correlations between the two recording sessions (Spearman correlations).
| Individuals Pop.1 | p | r | Individuals Pop. 2 | p | r |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | NA | NA | G5 | 0.08 | 0.57 |
| S2 | 0.70 | G6 | NA | NA | |
| G1 | 0.75 | -0.1 | G7 | 0.64 | |
| G2 | NA | NA | G8 | 0.93 | |
| G3 | 0.72 | G9 | 0.84 | ||
| G4 | 0.12 | 0.52 | M4 | 0.79 | |
| M1 | 0.73 | M5 | 0.76 | ||
| M2 | 0.23 | 0.41 | M6 | 0.91 | |
| M3 | 0.97 | M7 | 0.90 |
Mean waves proportions (delta Right (R), theta R, alpha R, beta R, gamma R, delta Left (L), theta L, alpha L, beta L, gamma L) recorded for the first and second session were correlated per horse. Significant values are in bold.
EEG activity recorded over the first session on the 18 horses.
| EEG wave activity (median proportions, %) | Delta (LH) | Theta (LH) | Alpha (LH) | Beta (LH) | Gamma (LH) | Delta (RH) | Theta (RH) | Alpha (RH) | Beta (RH) | Gamma (RH) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | 0.03 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 10.6 | 3.7 | 0.1 | 6.7 | 3.4 | 8 | 5.3 |
| Max | 28.5 | 59.1 | 19.3 | 52.6 | 46 | 27 | 67.1 | 20.4 | 44.4 | 40.7 |
| μ | 6.6 | 23.5 | 9.6 | 30.9 | 23.7 | 4.9 | 32.4 | 10.6 | 27.4 | 20.1 |
| sd | 8 | 12.9 | 3.9 | 10.2 | 12.4 | 7.7 | 17 | 4.3 | 10 | 10.9 |
Fig 2Relation between EEG power profile and postural indicators of spine state: median theta (A) and beta (B) proportion recorded in the left hemisphere according to the horse’s neck shape (as measured following Lesimple et al [22]’s method). Mann-Whitney test. ***p<0.001; **p<0.01; *p<0.05.
Fig 4Relationship between resting state EEG power profile and sEMG measures at different sites along the horse’s spine.
(A) Correlations between the proportion of each wave type in the left (LH) or right (RH) hemisphere and sEMG measures at each spine site; (B) representation of the different sEMG recording sites along the spine (C = cervical, T = thoracic, S = sacral).