Literature DB >> 25246175

Radiographic sclerotic contour loss in the identification of glenoid bone loss.

Troy D Bornes1, Jacob L Jaremko2, Lauren A Beaupre1,3, Martin J Bouliane4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Quantification of glenoid bone loss guides surgical management in the setting of anterior shoulder instability. Glenoid defects resulting in ≥20 % articular area loss require bony reconstruction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of sclerotic glenoid contour loss on true anteroposterior radiography in the detection of varying quantities of simulated glenoid bone loss using a cadaveric model.
METHODS: Eight cadaveric scapulae with full radiographic sclerotic contour were osteotomized to produce glenoid surface area reductions of 10-50 %. Radiography was performed initially and following each osteotomy, and assessed by an orthopedic surgeon and radiologist twice. Quantity of glenoid loss was compared using Fisher's exact test. Sensitivity, specificity, and reliability analyses were performed.
RESULTS: On the first radiographic review, sclerotic contour loss was detected in 6 out of 8 scapulae with 50 % area loss, but only 1 out of 8 scapulae with 20 % area loss. There was a significantly higher proportion of radiographs containing sclerotic contour loss for defects with 50 % area loss compared to those with 0-25 % loss (p ≤ 0.02). In the detection of ≥20 % area loss, sclerotic contour loss had a sensitivity of 33-43 % and specificity of 88-100 %. Moderate inter-observer reliability (Cohen's kappa value of 0.42-0.53) and intra-observer reliability (kappa value of 0.46-0.58) were found.
CONCLUSION: Radiographic sclerotic contour loss is commonly observed in radiographs of scapulae with 40-50 % glenoid area loss and less often with smaller lesions. However, this finding lacks utility in discerning specific quantifications of glenoid bone loss. In a clinical setting, sclerotic contour loss suggests the presence of a large glenoid defect that may require bony reconstruction. However, an intact sclerotic contour does not rule out significant bone loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glenohumeral instability; Glenoid bone loss; Radiography; Sclerotic contour loss

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25246175     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3328-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  37 in total

1.  Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied?

Authors:  John Eng
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Quantification of a glenoid defect with three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Pol E Huijsmans; Pieter S Haen; Martin Kidd; Wouter J Dhert; Victor P M van der Hulst; W Jaap Willems
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Effect of 10% formalin on radiographic optical density of bone specimens.

Authors:  A A Fonseca; K Cherubini; E B Veeck; R S Ladeira; L P Carapeto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Ethanol and formaldehyde fixation irreversibly alter bones' organic matrix.

Authors:  Niels Hammer; Christian Voigt; Michael Werner; Falk Hoffmann; Klaus Bente; Holger Kunze; Roger Scholz; Hanno Steinke
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-09-18

5.  The importance of CT for the pre-operative surgical planning in recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  Philipp Moroder; Herbert Resch; Silke Schnaitmann; Thomas Hoffelner; Mark Tauber
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Location of the glenoid defect in shoulders with recurrent anterior dislocation.

Authors:  Hidetomo Saito; Eiji Itoi; Hiroyuki Sugaya; Hiroshi Minagawa; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Yilihamu Tuoheti
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Two-dimensional glenoid version measurements vary with coronal and sagittal scapular rotation.

Authors:  Chris D Bryce; Andrew C Davison; Gregory S Lewis; Li Wang; Donald J Flemming; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Glenoid bone lesions: comparison between 3D VIBE images in MR arthrography and nonarthrographic MSCT.

Authors:  Chun-Yan Tian; Yao Shang; Zhuo-Zhao Zheng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  The instability severity index score. A simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation.

Authors:  F Balg; P Boileau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-11

10.  Motion of the shoulder complex during multiplanar humeral elevation.

Authors:  Paula M Ludewig; Vandana Phadke; Jonathan P Braman; Daniel R Hassett; Cort J Cieminski; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Current concepts of diagnostic techniques and measurement methods for bone defect in patient with anterior shoulder instability].

Authors:  Zhengfeng Pan; Fuguo Huang; Jian Li; Xin Tang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-06-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.