Literature DB >> 18061117

Quantification of a glenoid defect with three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study.

Pol E Huijsmans1, Pieter S Haen, Martin Kidd, Wouter J Dhert, Victor P M van der Hulst, W Jaap Willems.   

Abstract

Bone loss of the glenoid is a common finding in anterior glenohumeral instability. Several methods to measure the size of a glenoid defect have been described but have not been validated. In this study, 14 cadaver glenoids with a randomly created anteroinferior glenoid defect were used for validation of the so-called circle method. Measurements were done by 2 researchers on digital photographs, 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance images (MRI). The correlation coefficient (r(2)) for comparing measurements from the digital photographs with the CT scans was 0.97 for researcher 1 and 0.90 for researcher 2. When they compared digital images with MRI, the r(2) was 0.93 for researcher 1 and 0.92 for researcher 2. No statistical differences were found between the 2 researchers. The circle method is a simple method for preoperative quantification of a glenoid defect. Measurements can be done with 3D CT scans as well as MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18061117     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  44 in total

1.  A simple method for quantitative evaluation of the missing area of the anterior glenoid in anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint.

Authors:  Vidal S Barchilon; Eugene Kotz; Mercedes Barchilon Ben-Av; Ernesto Glazer; Meir Nyska
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Excellent side-to-side symmetry in glenoid size and shape.

Authors:  Lin Shi; James F Griffith; Junbin Huang; Defeng Wang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Techniques to evaluate glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Sugaya
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-03

Review 4.  Assessment of bone defects in anterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  Paolo Baudi; Gabriele Campochiaro; Manuela Rebuzzi; Giovanni Matino; Fabio Catani
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2013-06-12

5.  The quantification of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability; MR-arthro compared to 3D-CT.

Authors:  Jeroen E Markenstein; Kjell C C J Jaspars; Victor P M van der Hulst; W Jaap Willems
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.

Authors:  Anna Maria Kubicka; Jakub Stefaniak; Przemysław Lubiatowski; Jan Długosz; Marcin Dzianach; Marcin Redman; Janusz Piontek; Leszek Romanowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Justin West; Amin Nazaran; Xin Cheng; Heinz Hoenecke; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability: the quantification of glenoid bone loss using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Patrícia Martins e Souza; Bruno Lobo Brandão; Eduardo Brown; Geraldo Motta; Martim Monteiro; Edson Marchiori
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  MRI can assess glenoid bone loss after shoulder luxation: inter- and intra-individual comparison with CT.

Authors:  Alessandro Stecco; Elena Guenzi; Teresa Cascone; Francesco Fabbiano; Paolo Fornara; Paolo Oronzo; Federico Alberto Grassi; Gregorio Cecchi; Mario Caniggia; Marco Brambilla; Alessandro Carriero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Detection of partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears: is a single direct MR arthrography series in ABER position as accurate as conventional MR arthrography?

Authors:  Saskia A Schreinemachers; Victor P M van der Hulst; W Jaap Willems; Shandra Bipat; Henk-Jan van der Woude
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.