BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of suitable objective endpoints to measure disease progression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Emerging research suggests that diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has potential as an outcome measure for the evaluation of skeletal muscle injury. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of DTI as quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers of disease severity in DMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen consecutive boys (8.9 years ± 3.0 years) with DMD were evaluated using DTI. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were compared with clinical outcome measures of manual muscle testing and MRI determinations of muscle fat fraction (MFF) in the right lower extremity. RESULTS: Both MRI measures of FA and ADC strongly correlated with age and muscle strength. Values for FA positively correlated with age and negatively correlated with muscle strength (r = 0.78 and -0.96; both P ≤ 0.002) while measures of ADC negatively correlated age, but positively correlated with muscle strength (r = -0.87 and 0.83; both P ≤ 0.0004). Additionally, ADC and FA strongly correlated with MFF (r = -0.891 and 0.894, respectively; both P ≤ 0.0001). Mean MMF was negatively correlated with muscle strength (r = -0.89, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: DTI measures of muscle structure strongly correlated with muscle strength and adiposity in boys with DMD in this pilot study, although these markers may be more reflective of fat replacement rather than muscle damage in later stages of the disease. Further studies in presymptomatic younger children are needed to assess the ability of DTI to detect early changes in DMD.
BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of suitable objective endpoints to measure disease progression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Emerging research suggests that diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has potential as an outcome measure for the evaluation of skeletal muscle injury. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of DTI as quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers of disease severity in DMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen consecutive boys (8.9 years ± 3.0 years) with DMD were evaluated using DTI. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were compared with clinical outcome measures of manual muscle testing and MRI determinations of muscle fat fraction (MFF) in the right lower extremity. RESULTS: Both MRI measures of FA and ADC strongly correlated with age and muscle strength. Values for FA positively correlated with age and negatively correlated with muscle strength (r = 0.78 and -0.96; both P ≤ 0.002) while measures of ADC negatively correlated age, but positively correlated with muscle strength (r = -0.87 and 0.83; both P ≤ 0.0004). Additionally, ADC and FA strongly correlated with MFF (r = -0.891 and 0.894, respectively; both P ≤ 0.0001). Mean MMF was negatively correlated with muscle strength (r = -0.89, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: DTI measures of muscle structure strongly correlated with muscle strength and adiposity in boys with DMD in this pilot study, although these markers may be more reflective of fat replacement rather than muscle damage in later stages of the disease. Further studies in presymptomatic younger children are needed to assess the ability of DTI to detect early changes in DMD.
Authors: Hee Kyung Kim; Tal Laor; Paul S Horn; Judy M Racadio; Brenda Wong; Bernard J Dardzinski Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hermien E Kan; Tom W J Scheenen; Marielle Wohlgemuth; Dennis W J Klomp; Ivonne van Loosbroek-Wagenmans; George W Padberg; Arend Heerschap Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2009-03-28 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Thorsten A Bley; Oliver Wieben; Christopher J François; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Skorn Ponrartana; Kristine E Andrade; Tishya A L Wren; Leigh Ramos-Platt; Houchun H Hu; Stefan Bluml; Vicente Gilsanz Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Charles A McKenzie; Angel R Pineda; Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Anja C Brau; Brian A Hargreaves; Garry E Gold; Jean H Brittain Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: M H Brooke; G M Fenichel; R C Griggs; J R Mendell; R Moxley; J P Miller; M A Province Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 1983-02 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: R Rehmann; L Schlaffke; M Froeling; R A Kley; E Kühnle; M De Marées; J Forsting; M Rohm; M Tegenthoff; T Schmidt-Wilcke; M Vorgerd Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Pierre G Carlier; Benjamin Marty; Olivier Scheidegger; Paulo Loureiro de Sousa; Pierre-Yves Baudin; Eduard Snezhko; Dmitry Vlodavets Journal: J Neuromuscul Dis Date: 2016-03-03
Authors: Lorenzo Maggi; Marco Moscatelli; Rita Frangiamore; Federica Mazzi; Mattia Verri; Alberto De Luca; Maria Barbara Pasanisi; Giovanni Baranello; Irene Tramacere; Luisa Chiapparini; Maria Grazia Bruzzone; Renato Mantegazza; Domenico Aquino Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: M T Hooijmans; B M Damon; M Froeling; M J Versluis; J Burakiewicz; J J G M Verschuuren; E H Niks; A G Webb; H E Kan Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 4.044