Literature DB >> 26449628

Evaluation of skeletal muscle DTI in patients with duchenne muscular dystrophy.

M T Hooijmans1, B M Damon2, M Froeling3, M J Versluis4, J Burakiewicz1, J J G M Verschuuren5, E H Niks5, A G Webb1, H E Kan1.   

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a popular method to assess differences in fiber organization in diseased and healthy muscle tissue. Previous work has shown that muscle DTI measurements depend on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), %fat, and tissue T2. The goal of this study was to evaluate the potential biasing effects of these factors on skeletal muscle DTI data in patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). MR images were obtained of the right lower leg of 21 DMD patients and 12 healthy controls on a Philips 3T system. DTI measurements were combined with quantitative in-vivo measures of mean water T2, %fat and SNR to evaluate their effect on DTI parameter estimation. All outcome measures were determined within ROIs drawn for six lower leg muscles. Between group analysis, using all ROIs, revealed a significantly elevated FA in the GCL, SOL and PER muscles (p<0.05) and an increased mean diffusivity (p<0.05) and λ3 (p<0.05) in the TA muscle of DMD patients. In-vivo evaluation of the individual confounders showed behaviour in line with predictions from previous simulation work. To account for these confounders, subsequent analysis used only ROIs with SNR greater than 20. With this criterion we found significantly greater MD in the TA muscle of DMD patient (p<0.009) and λ3 in the TA and GCL muscles (p<0.001) of DMD patients, but no differences in FA. As both increased %fat and lower SNR are expected to reduce the apparent MD and λ3, these between-group differences are likely due to pathophysiology. However, the increased FA, observed when using all ROIs, likely reflects the effect of low SNR and %fat on the DTI parameter estimation. These findings suggest that measuring mean water T2, %fat and SNR is essential to ascribe changes in DTI measures to intrinsic diffusion changes or to confounding influences.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Duchenne muscular dystrophy; diffusion tensor imaging; fat fraction; mean water T2; signal-to-noise ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26449628      PMCID: PMC4670831          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  35 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor imaging in biomechanical studies of skeletal muscle function.

Authors:  C C Van Donkelaar; L J Kretzers; P H Bovendeerd; L M Lataster; K Nicolay; J D Janssen; M R Drost
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  A diffusion tensor imaging analysis of gender differences in water diffusivity within human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Stefan Maderwald; Kai Uffmann; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of the human calf muscle.

Authors:  Shantanu Sinha; Usha Sinha; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Nuclear magnetic resonance measurement of skeletal muscle: anisotrophy of the diffusion coefficient of the intracellular water.

Authors:  G G Cleveland; D C Chang; C F Hazlewood; H E Rorschach
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI.

Authors:  P J Basser; C Pierpaoli
Journal:  J Magn Reson B       Date:  1996-06

Review 6.  Diffusion tensor imaging in musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Jean-François Budzik; Vincent Balbi; Sébastien Verclytte; Vittorio Pansini; Vianney Le Thuc; Anne Cotten
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Diffusion tensor imaging in evaluation of human skeletal muscle injury.

Authors:  Tatiana Zaraiskaya; Dinesh Kumbhare; Michael D Noseworthy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus.

Authors:  E P Hoffman; R H Brown; L M Kunkel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-12-24       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Skeletal muscle degeneration and regeneration after femoral artery ligation in mice: monitoring with diffusion MR imaging.

Authors:  Anneriet M Heemskerk; Gustav J Strijkers; Maarten R Drost; Glenda S van Bochove; Klaas Nicolay
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Muscle MRI findings in limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2L.

Authors:  Anna Sarkozy; Marcus Deschauer; Robert-Yves Carlier; Bertold Schrank; Jürgen Seeger; Maggie C Walter; Benedikt Schoser; Peter Reilich; France Leturq; Aleksandar Radunovic; Anthony Behin; Pascal Laforet; Bruno Eymard; Herbert Schreiber; Debbie Hicks; Sujit S Vaidya; Dieter Gläser; Pierre G Carlier; Kate Bushby; Hanns Lochmüller; Volker Straub
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.296

View more
  30 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion modeling: Application to monitoring changes in the medial gastrocnemius in disuse atrophy induced by unilateral limb suspension.

Authors:  Vadim Malis; Usha Sinha; Robert Csapo; Marco Narici; Edward Smitaman; Shantanu Sinha
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Muscle diffusion tensor imaging in glycogen storage disease V (McArdle disease).

Authors:  R Rehmann; L Schlaffke; M Froeling; R A Kley; E Kühnle; M De Marées; J Forsting; M Rohm; M Tegenthoff; T Schmidt-Wilcke; M Vorgerd
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Fractional anisotropy and diffusivity changes in thyroid-associated orbitopathy.

Authors:  Ji Sung Han; Hyung Suk Seo; Young Hen Lee; Hwa Lee; Sang-Il Suh; Eun-Kee Jeong; Nabraj Sapkota; Ki Joon Kim
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Contemporary image-based methods for measuring passive mechanical properties of skeletal muscles in vivo.

Authors:  Lynne E Bilston; Bart Bolsterlee; Antoine Nordez; Shantanu Sinha
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-09-20

Review 5.  Skeletal Muscle Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy as an Outcome Measure for Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Pierre G Carlier; Benjamin Marty; Olivier Scheidegger; Paulo Loureiro de Sousa; Pierre-Yves Baudin; Eduard Snezhko; Dmitry Vlodavets
Journal:  J Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2016-03-03

6.  Capturing complexity of the diffusion-weighted MR signal decay.

Authors:  Richard L Magin; M Muge Karaman; Matt G Hall; Wenzhen Zhu; Xiaohong Joe Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Quantitative Muscle MRI Protocol as Possible Biomarker in Becker Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Lorenzo Maggi; Marco Moscatelli; Rita Frangiamore; Federica Mazzi; Mattia Verri; Alberto De Luca; Maria Barbara Pasanisi; Giovanni Baranello; Irene Tramacere; Luisa Chiapparini; Maria Grazia Bruzzone; Renato Mantegazza; Domenico Aquino
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  * A 3D Tissue-Printing Approach for Validation of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Skeletal Muscle.

Authors:  David B Berry; Shangting You; John Warner; Lawrence R Frank; Shaochen Chen; Samuel R Ward
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Relationships between tissue microstructure and the diffusion tensor in simulated skeletal muscle.

Authors:  David B Berry; Benjamin Regner; Vitaly Galinsky; Samuel R Ward; Lawrence R Frank
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Skeletal muscle diffusion tensor-MRI fiber tracking: rationale, data acquisition and analysis methods, applications and future directions.

Authors:  Bruce M Damon; Martijn Froeling; Amanda K W Buck; Jos Oudeman; Zhaohua Ding; Aart J Nederveen; Emily C Bush; Gustav J Strijkers
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.