Literature DB >> 25245059

Assessment of field-grown cellulase-expressing corn.

Martina Garda1, Shivakumar P Devaiah, Deborah Vicuna Requesens, Yeun-Kyung Chang, Audrei Dabul, Christy Hanson, Kendall R Hood, Elizabeth E Hood.   

Abstract

Transgenic plants in the US and abroad generated using genetic engineering technology are regulated with respect to release into the environment and inclusion into diets of humans and animals. For crops incorporating pharmaceuticals or industrial enzymes regulations are even more stringent. Notifications are not allowed for movement and release, therefore a permit is required. However, growing under permit is cumbersome and more expensive than open, non- regulated growth. Thus, when the genetically engineered pharmaceutical or industrial crop is ready for scale-up, achieving non-regulated status is critical. Regulatory compliance in the US comprises petitioning the appropriate agencies for permission for environmental release and feeding trials. For release without yearly permits, a petition for allowing non-regulated status can be filed with the United States Department of Agriculture with consultations that include the Food and Drug Administration and possibly the Environmental Protection Agency, the latter if the plant includes an incorporated pesticide. The data package should ensure that the plants are substantially equivalent in every parameter except for the engineered trait. We undertook a preliminary study on transgenic maize field-grown hybrids that express one of two cellulase genes, an exo-cellulase or an endo-cellulase. We performed field observations of whole plants and numerous in vitro analyses of grain. Although some minor differences were observed when comparing genetically engineered hybrid plants to control wild type hybrids, no significant differences were seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25245059     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-014-9838-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  14 in total

Review 1.  Plant-based production of biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Rainer Fischer; Eva Stoger; Stefan Schillberg; Paul Christou; Richard M Twyman
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.834

2.  The regulatory bottleneck for biotech specialty crops.

Authors:  Jamie K Miller; Kent J Bradford
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Criteria for high-level expression of a fungal laccase gene in transgenic maize.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hood; Michele R Bailey; Katherine Beifuss; Maria Magallanes-Lundback; Michael E Horn; Evelyn Callaway; Carol Drees; Donna E Delaney; Richard Clough; John A Howard
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.803

4.  Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  E M Southern
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1975-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Agricultural input traits: past, present and future.

Authors:  Linda A Castle; Gusui Wu; David McElroy
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 9.740

6.  Unintended compositional changes in genetically modified (GM) crops: 20 years of research.

Authors:  Rod A Herman; William D Price
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 5.279

7.  Genomic sequencing.

Authors:  G M Church; W Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Manipulating corn germplasm to increase recombinant protein accumulation.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hood; Shivakumar P Devaiah; Gina Fake; Erin Egelkrout; Keat Thomas Teoh; Deborah Vicuna Requesens; Celine Hayden; Kendall R Hood; Kameshwari M Pappu; Jennifer Carroll; John A Howard
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 9.  Risk assessment and regulation of molecular farming - a comparison between Europe and US.

Authors:  Penelope Sparrow; Inge Broer; Elizabeth E Hood; Kellye Eversole; Frank Hartung; Joachim Schiemann
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.116

10.  Subcellular targeting is a key condition for high-level accumulation of cellulase protein in transgenic maize seed.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hood; Robert Love; Jeff Lane; Jeff Bray; Richard Clough; Kamesh Pappu; Carol Drees; Kendall R Hood; Sangwoong Yoon; Atta Ahmad; John A Howard
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 9.803

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Transgenic Plant-Produced Hydrolytic Enzymes and the Potential of Insect Gut-Derived Hydrolases for Biofuels.

Authors:  Jonathan D Willis; Mitra Mazarei; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 2.  Strategies for the production of cell wall-deconstructing enzymes in lignocellulosic biomass and their utilization for biofuel production.

Authors:  Sang-Hyuck Park; Rebecca Garlock Ong; Mariam Sticklen
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 9.803

3.  The TcEG1 beetle (Tribolium castaneum) cellulase produced in transgenic switchgrass is active at alkaline pH and auto-hydrolyzes biomass for increased cellobiose release.

Authors:  Jonathan D Willis; Joshua N Grant; Mitra Mazarei; Lindsey M Kline; Caroline S Rempe; A Grace Collins; Geoffrey B Turner; Stephen R Decker; Robert W Sykes; Mark F Davis; Nicole Labbe; Juan L Jurat-Fuentes; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 6.040

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.