Literature DB >> 23414177

Unintended compositional changes in genetically modified (GM) crops: 20 years of research.

Rod A Herman1, William D Price.   

Abstract

The compositional equivalency between genetically modified (GM) crops and nontransgenic comparators has been a fundamental component of human health safety assessment for 20 years. During this time, a large amount of information has been amassed on the compositional changes that accompany both the transgenesis process and traditional breeding methods; additionally, the genetic mechanisms behind these changes have been elucidated. After two decades, scientists are encouraged to objectively assess this body of literature and determine if sufficient scientific uncertainty still exists to continue the general requirement for these studies to support the safety assessment of transgenic crops. It is concluded that suspect unintended compositional effects that could be caused by genetic modification have not materialized on the basis of this substantial literature. Hence, compositional equivalence studies uniquely required for GM crops may no longer be justified on the basis of scientific uncertainty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23414177     DOI: 10.1021/jf400135r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  40 in total

Review 1.  EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Jaime Aguilera; Zoltán Diveki; Ana Gomes; Yi Liu; Claudia Paoletti; Patrick du Jardin; Lieve Herman; Joe N Perry; Elisabeth Waigmann
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  How safe does transgenic food need to be?

Authors:  Laura DeFrancesco
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Genetically engineered crops that fly under the US regulatory radar.

Authors:  Alex Camacho; Allen Van Deynze; Cecilia Chi-Ham; Alan B Bennett
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Genetic modification in Malaysia and India: current regulatory framework and the special case of non-transformative RNAi in agriculture.

Authors:  Jasdeep Kaur Darsan Singh; Nurzatil Sharleeza Mat Jalaluddin; Neeti Sanan-Mishra; Jennifer Ann Harikrishna
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.570

5.  Comparative evaluation of nutritional compositions between transgenic rice harboring the CaMsrB2 gene and the conventional counterpart.

Authors:  Yong-Hwa Cho; Pradeep Puligundla; Sung-Dug Oh; Hyang-Mi Park; Kyung-Min Kim; Si-Myung Lee; Tae-Hun Ryu; Young-Tack Lee
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.391

6.  Ending event-based regulation of GMO crops.

Authors:  Steven H Strauss; Joanna K Sax
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Transcriptomic Analysis of Mature Transgenic Poplar Expressing the Transcription Factor JERF36 Gene in Two Different Environments.

Authors:  Weixi Zhang; Yanbo Wang; Tengqian Zhang; Jing Zhang; Le Shen; Bingyu Zhang; Changjun Ding; Xiaohua Su
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-14

8.  Maize hybrids derived from GM positive and negative segregant inbreds are compositionally equivalent: any observed differences are associated with conventional backcrossing practices.

Authors:  Tyamagondlu V Venkatesh; Erin Bell; Anna Bickel; Kevin Cook; Benjamin Alsop; Martijn van de Mortel; Ping Feng; Alan Willse; Tim Perez; George G Harrigan
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Assessment of field-grown cellulase-expressing corn.

Authors:  Martina Garda; Shivakumar P Devaiah; Deborah Vicuna Requesens; Yeun-Kyung Chang; Audrei Dabul; Christy Hanson; Kendall R Hood; Elizabeth E Hood
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Molecular characterization for food safety assessment of a genetically modified late blight resistant potato: an unusual case.

Authors:  Kelly A Zarka; Karen Hokanson; David S Douches
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.