Literature DB >> 25244926

Effects of aging procedures on the topographic surface, structural stability, and mechanical strength of a ZrO2-based dental ceramic.

Caroline Cotes1, Anelyse Arata1, Renata M Melo1, Marco A Bottino1, João P B Machado2, Rodrigo O A Souza3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of different aging methods on the degradation and flexural strength of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP)
METHODS: Sixty disc-shaped specimens (∅, 12mm; thickness, 1.6mm) of zirconia (Vita InCeram 2000 YZ Cubes, VITA Zahnfabrik) were prepared (ISO 6872) and randomly divided into five groups, according to the aging procedures (n=10): (C) control; (M) mechanical cycling (15,000,000 cycles/3.8Hz/200N); (T) thermal cycling (6,000 cycles/5-55°C/30s); (TM) thermomechanical cycling (1,200,000 cycles/3.8Hz/200N with temperature range from 5°C to 55°C for 60s each); (AUT) 12h in autoclave at 134°C/2bars; and (STO) storage in distilled water (37°C/400 days). After the aging procedures, the monoclinic phase percentages were evaluated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), and topographic surface analysis was performed by 3D profilometry. The specimens were then subjected to biaxial flexure testing (1mm/min, load 100kgf, in water). The biaxial flexural strength data (MPa) were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). The data for monoclinic phase percentage and profilometry (Ra) were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests.
RESULTS: ANOVA revealed that flexural strength was affected by the aging procedures (p=0.002). The M (781.6MPa) and TM (771.3MPa) groups presented lower values of flexural strength than did C (955MPa), AUT (955.8MPa), T (960.8MPa) and STO (910.4MPa). The monoclinic phase percentage was significantly higher only for STO (12.22%) and AUT (29.97%) when compared with that of the control group (Kruskal-Wallis test, p=0.004). In addition, the surface roughnesses were similar among the groups (p=0.165). SIGNIFICANCE: Water storage for 400 days and autoclave aging procedures induced higher phase transformation from tetragonal to monoclinic; however, they did not affect the flexural strength of Y-TZP ceramic, which decreased only after mechanical and thermomechanical cycling.
Copyright © 2014 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexural strength; Phase transformation; Yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25244926     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  14 in total

1.  Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and low temperature degradation on the surface topography, phase transformation and flexural strength of ultra-translucent ZrO2 ceramic.

Authors:  Taciana Emília Leite Vila-Nova; Isabelle Helena Gurgel de Carvalho; Dayanne Monielle Duarte Moura; André Ulisses Dantas Batista; Yu Zhang; Carlos Alberto Paskocimas; Marco Antonio Bottino; Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E Souza
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Effect of extrinsic pigmentation and surface treatments on biaxial flexure strength after cyclic loading of a translucent ZrO2 ceramic.

Authors:  Breno Fortes Bittar; Jean Soares Miranda; Arthur Chaves Simões; Nathália de Carvalho Ramos; João P B Machado; Yu Zhang; Rodrigo Othávio Assunção Souza; Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Leite
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2019-09-29       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Surface Characteristics of High Translucent Multilayered Dental Zirconia Related to Aging.

Authors:  Flavia Roxana Toma; Mihaela Ionela Bîrdeanu; Ion-Dragoș Uțu; Roxana Diana Vasiliu; Lavinia Cristina Moleriu; Liliana Porojan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Microbial adhesion on novel yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) implant surfaces with nitrogen-doped hydrogenated amorphous carbon (a-C:H:N) coatings.

Authors:  Stefanie Schienle; Ali Al-Ahmad; Ralf Joachim Kohal; Falk Bernsmann; Erik Adolfsson; Laura Montanaro; Paola Palmero; Tobias Fürderer; Jérôme Chevalier; Elmar Hellwig; Lamprini Karygianni
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Effect of different semimonolithic designs on fracture resistance and fracture mode of translucent and high-translucent zirconia crowns.

Authors:  Fahad Bakitian; Przemek Seweryniak; Evaggelia Papia; Christel Larsson; Per Vult von Steyern
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-03-28

6.  Effects of Acid Treatment on Dental Zirconia: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Haifeng Xie; Shuping Shen; Mengke Qian; Feimin Zhang; Chen Chen; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia.

Authors:  Ipek Caglar; Sabit Melih Ates; Zeynep Yesil Duymus
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Ageing assessment of zirconia implant prostheses by three different quantitative assessment techniques.

Authors:  Phyu Phyu Kyaw; Pong Pongprueksa; Warangkana Anuchitolarn; Krongkarn Sirinukunwatta; Kallaya Suputtamongkol
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Effect of Hydrothermal Aging and Beverages on Color Stability of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Based Ceramics.

Authors:  Satheesh B Haralur; Noura Raqe S Alqahtani; Fatimah Alhassan Mujayri
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Effect of glazing application side and mechanical cycling on the biaxial flexural strength and Weibull characteristics of a Y-TZP ceramic.

Authors:  Carolina Machado Martinelli Lobo; Sâmia Carolina Mota Cavalcanti Sacorague; Nathalia Ramos da Silva; Anna Karina Figueiredo Costa; Larissa Marcia Martins Alves; Marco Antônio Bottino; Mutlu Özcan; Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E Souza; Renata Marques de Melo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.