Literature DB >> 25244415

Sustained participation, colonoscopy uptake and adenoma detection rates over two rounds of the Tallaght-Trinity College colorectal cancer screening programme with the faecal immunological test.

Deirdre McNamara1, Ronan Leen, Chun Seng-Lee, Nikki Shearer, Paul Crotty, Paul Neary, Paul Walsh, Gerard Boran, Colm O'Morain.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies to date support the use of the faecal immunological test (FIT) in colorectal cancer screening programmes, and it has been widely adopted across Europe, Canada, Australia, and the USA. Successive screening rounds are necessary to detect and prevent colorectal cancer. The overall success of FIT screening will depend on several factors, the most important probably being the acceptability of repeated screening rounds. Being a newer form of occult blood testing, there is little data available on its overall efficacy over time. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess key performance indices during a second round of FIT screening in an Irish cohort and to compare results between successive rounds.
METHODS: A biennial, two tests, two-step design with postal invites and colonoscopy offered to anyone with a single FIT greater than 100 ngHb/ml was used. Recommended key performance measures were assessed and compared, including participation, positivity, colonoscopy uptake and adenoma and cancer detection rates.
RESULTS: In round two, 9863 individuals (98.6%) of the round one cohort were contacted. The round two participation rate was 47.5% (n=4685), only slightly lower than the 51% registered in round one. Male sex and younger age were associated with lower uptake. Overall positivity decreased from 10 to 8% over time (P<0.0001). Although the number of cancers detected during round two decreased significantly, overall neoplasia detection rates remained stable; positive predictive values for cancer and adenoma were 4 versus 1% and 37 versus 35%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Repeated rounds of FIT screening in the Tallaght-Trinity College cohort achieved stable participation and neoplasia detection rates, suggesting that this mode of screening is both effective and acceptable to patients in the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25244415     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  8 in total

1.  FITting ADR to colonoscopy indication.

Authors:  C Hassan; A Repici; D K Rex
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  A Systematic Review of Repeat Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Ahana Sen; Bianca Watson; Samir Gupta; Helen Mayo; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.

Authors:  Esmée J Grobbee; Pieter Ha Wisse; Eline H Schreuders; Aafke van Roon; Leonie van Dam; Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Wichor Bramer; Sarah Berhane; Jonathan J Deeks; Ewout W Steyerberg; Monique E van Leerdam; Manon Cw Spaander; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 4.  Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; Jeffrey K Lee; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer population screening programs worldwide in 2016: An update.

Authors:  Mercedes Navarro; Andrea Nicolas; Angel Ferrandez; Angel Lanas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  The fecal immunochemical test (fit): Selected aspects regarding its effectiveness for colorectal cancer screening in Quebec City.

Authors:  Mireille Caron; Gabriel Lamarre; Philippe Grégoire; David Simonyan; Nathalie Laflamme
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-08-04

7.  Does self-reported symptom questionnaire play a role in nonadherence to colonoscopy for risk-increased population in the Tianjin colorectal cancer screening programme?

Authors:  Lizhong Zhao; Xiaorui Zhang; Yongjie Chen; Yuan Wang; Weihua Zhang; Wenli Lu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Quality Metrics of a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea.

Authors:  Dae Ho Kim; Jae Myung Cha; Min Seob Kwak; Jin Young Yoon; Young-Hak Cho; Jung Won Jeon; Hyun Phil Shin; Kwang Ro Joo; Joung Il Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.519

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.