Mitsuhiro Sekijima1, Shiori Waki, Hisashi Sahara, Masayuki Tasaki, Robert A Wilkinson, Vincenzo Villani, Yoshiki Shimatsu, Kazuaki Nakano, Hitomi Matsunari, Hiroshi Nagashima, Jay A Fishman, Akira Shimizu, Kazuhiko Yamada. 1. 1 Division of Organ Replacement and Xenotransplantation Surgery, Center for Advanced Biomedical Science and Swine Research, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan. 2 Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan. 3 Transplantation Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 4 Research and Development Department, Nippon Institute for Biological Science, Tokyo, Japan. 5 Laboratory of Developmental Engineering, Meiji University School of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan. 6 Address correspondence to: Kazuhiko Yamada, M.D., Ph.D., Center for Advanced Biomedical Science and Swine Research, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Various durations of survival have been observed in the xenotransplantation of life-supporting α-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout (GalT-KO) porcine kidneys into nonhuman primates. Although others have demonstrated loss of GalT-KO-transplanted kidneys within 2 weeks, we have reported an average survival of 51 days with the cotransplantation of the kidney and vascularized thymus and an average of 29 days with the kidney alone. To determine the factors responsible for this difference in survival time, we performed xenogeneic kidney transplantations into cynomolgus monkeys with an anti-CD40L-based regimen using two different strains of GalT-KO swine, one derived from MGH miniature swine and the other obtained from Meji University. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight cynomolgus moneys received GalT-KO kidneys. Three kidney grafts were from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)-Nippon Institute for Biological Science (NIBS) GalT-KO pigs and five GalT-KO grafts were from MEIJI GalT-KO swine. All cynomolgus recipients were treated identically. RESULTS: Recipients of kidneys from the MGH GalT-KO kidneys swine, produced by nuclear transfer in Japan, survived an average of 28.7 days, whereas recipients of MEIJI GalT-KO kidneys swine survived an average of 9.2 days. Among the differences between these two groups, one potentially revealing disparity was that the MEIJI swine were positive for porcine cytomegalovirus, whereas the MGH-derived swine were negative. CONCLUSION: This is the first study comparing renal xenotransplantation from two different sources of GalT-KO swine into nonhuman primates at a single center. The results demonstrate that porcine cytomegalovirus may be responsible for early loss of GalT-KO swine kidney xenografts.
BACKGROUND: Various durations of survival have been observed in the xenotransplantation of life-supporting α-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout (GalT-KO) porcine kidneys into nonhuman primates. Although others have demonstrated loss of GalT-KO-transplanted kidneys within 2 weeks, we have reported an average survival of 51 days with the cotransplantation of the kidney and vascularized thymus and an average of 29 days with the kidney alone. To determine the factors responsible for this difference in survival time, we performed xenogeneic kidney transplantations into cynomolgus monkeys with an anti-CD40L-based regimen using two different strains of GalT-KO swine, one derived from MGH miniature swine and the other obtained from Meji University. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight cynomolgus moneys received GalT-KO kidneys. Three kidney grafts were from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)-Nippon Institute for Biological Science (NIBS) GalT-KO pigs and five GalT-KO grafts were from MEIJI GalT-KO swine. All cynomolgus recipients were treated identically. RESULTS: Recipients of kidneys from the MGHGalT-KO kidneys swine, produced by nuclear transfer in Japan, survived an average of 28.7 days, whereas recipients of MEIJI GalT-KO kidneys swine survived an average of 9.2 days. Among the differences between these two groups, one potentially revealing disparity was that the MEIJI swine were positive for porcine cytomegalovirus, whereas the MGH-derived swine were negative. CONCLUSION: This is the first study comparing renal xenotransplantation from two different sources of GalT-KO swine into nonhuman primates at a single center. The results demonstrate that porcine cytomegalovirus may be responsible for early loss of GalT-KO swine kidney xenografts.
Authors: J S Kloover; A P Soots; L A Krogerus; H O Kauppinen; R J Loginov; K L Holma; C A Bruggeman; P J Ahonen; I T Lautenschlager Journal: Transplantation Date: 2000-06-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Nicolas J Mueller; Rolf N Barth; Shin Yamamoto; Hiroshi Kitamura; Clive Patience; Kazuhiko Yamada; David K C Cooper; David H Sachs; Amitinder Kaur; Jay A Fishman Journal: J Virol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Nicolas J Mueller; Kristen Sulling; Bernd Gollackner; Shin Yamamoto; Christoph Knosalla; Robert A Wilkinson; Amitinder Kaur; David H Sachs; Kazuhiko Yamada; David K C Cooper; Clive Patience; Jay A Fishman Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Bernd Gollackner; Nicolas J Mueller; Stuart Houser; Imrana Qawi; Daniel Soizic; Christoph Knosalla; Leo Buhler; Frank J M F Dor; Michel Awwad; David H Sachs; David K C Cooper; Simon C Robson; Jay A Fishman Journal: Transplantation Date: 2003-06-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Donna Kolber-Simonds; Liangxue Lai; Steven R Watt; Maria Denaro; Scott Arn; Monica L Augenstein; Jeffery Betthauser; David B Carter; Julia L Greenstein; Yanhong Hao; Gi-Sun Im; Zhonghua Liu; Greg D Mell; Clifton N Murphy; Kwang-Wook Park; August Rieke; David J J Ryan; David H Sachs; Erik J Forsberg; Randall S Prather; Robert J Hawley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-05-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Laura Higginbotham; Dave Mathews; Cynthia A Breeden; Mingqing Song; Alton Brad Farris; Christian P Larsen; Mandy L Ford; Andrew J Lutz; Matthew Tector; Kenneth A Newell; A Joseph Tector; Andrew B Adams Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: J A Shah; M S Patel; N Elias; N Navarro-Alvarez; I Rosales; R A Wilkinson; N J Louras; M Hertl; J A Fishman; R B Colvin; A B Cosimi; J F Markmann; D H Sachs; P A Vagefi Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: M Tasaki; I Wamala; A Tena; V Villani; M Sekijima; V Pathiraja; R A Wilkinson; S Pratts; T Cormack; E Clayman; J S Arn; A Shimizu; J A Fishman; D H Sachs; K Yamada Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: S Le Bas-Bernardet; X Tillou; J Branchereau; N Dilek; N Poirier; M Châtelais; B Charreau; D Minault; J Hervouet; K Renaudin; C Crossan; L Scobie; Y Takeuchi; M Diswall; M E Breimer; N Klar; M R Daha; P Simioni; S C Robson; M B Nottle; E J Salvaris; P J Cowan; A J F d'Apice; D H Sachs; K Yamada; I Lagutina; R Duchi; A Perota; G Lazzari; C Galli; E Cozzi; J-P Soulillou; B Vanhove; G Blancho Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 8.086