Literature DB >> 25242233

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with morcellation: should it stay or should it go?

Jubilee Brown1, Kristal Taylor2, Pedro T Ramirez3, Charlotte Sun3, Laura L Holman3, S Mark Cone4, John Irwin4, Michael Frumovitz3.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To establish the risk of unidentified neoplasia and subsequent adverse outcomes of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) with morcellation.
DESIGN: Retrospective review (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: University community hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive women who had undergone SCH with morcellation between January 2002 and December 2008.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical records were assessed for patient characteristics and outcomes. We identified 808 women who had undergone planned laparoscopic SCH with morcellation. Their median age was 44.1 years (range, 23.4-79.8 years). The most common indications were menorrhagia in 472 patients (58.4%) and leiomyomas in 400 patients (49.5%). Of the 30 patients in whom laparoscopy was converted to an open procedure before morcellation, 1 had leiomyosarcoma at final pathologic analysis. Of the 778 patients who underwent laparoscopic SCH with morcellation, 16 (2.0%) had endometrial hyperplasia and 3 (0.4%) had cancer at final pathologic analysis. Abnormal pathologic findings were more likely in women older than age 50 years with abnormal bleeding. Of the 778 patients, 189 were younger than 40 years, and 4 of these 189 women (2.1%) had hyperplasia at final pathologic analysis; none had cancer. Of the 433 patients aged 40 to 49 years, 8 (1.8%) had hyperplasia or cancer. Of the 156 patients aged 50 years or older, 7 (4.5%) had hyperplasia (p = .18); none had cancer. No patient with hyperplasia or morcellated cancer experienced adverse sequelae after a median follow-up of 90.4 months.
CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic SCH, the risk of hyperplasia or malignancy was low. Laparoscopic SCH with morcellation seems to be a low-risk procedure.
Copyright © 2015 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Morcellation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25242233      PMCID: PMC4489848          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  19 in total

1.  Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach.

Authors:  J Mäkinen; J Johansson; C Tomás; E Tomás; P K Heinonen; T Laatikainen; M Kauko; A M Heikkinen; J Sjöberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Outcomes after total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ranee Thakar; Susan Ayers; Peter Clarkson; Stuart Stanton; Isaac Manyonda
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Arnaud Wattiez; Shlomo B Cohen; Luigi Selvaggi
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 4.  Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Todd R Jenkins
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 388 November 2007: supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Supracervical hysterectomy: ... a time for reappraisal.

Authors:  M G Munro
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Randomised controlled trial of total compared with subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results.

Authors:  Helga Gimbel; Vibeke Zobbe; Birthe Margrethe Andersen; Thomas Filtenborg; Christian Gluud; Ann Tabor
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Lee A Learman; Robert L Summitt; R Edward Varner; S Gene McNeeley; Deborah Goodman-Gruen; Holly E Richter; Feng Lin; Jonathan Showstack; Christine C Ireland; Eric Vittinghoff; Stephen B Hulley; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Uterine pathology in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy using morcellation.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Ana I Tergas; William M Burke; Rosa R Cui; Cande V Ananth; Ling Chen; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling for the detection of high-grade endometrial tumors.

Authors:  Gloria S Huang; Juliana S Gebb; Mark H Einstein; Shohreh Shahabi; Akiva P Novetsky; Gary L Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prognosis of women with apparent stage I endometrial cancer who had supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Hiroko Machida; Tsuyoshi Takiuchi; Jocelyn Garcia-Sayre; Annie A Yessaian; Lynda D Roman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation vs abdominal hysterectomy for presumed fibroids: an updated decision analysis following the 2014 Food and Drug Administration safety communications.

Authors:  Matthew T Siedhoff; Kemi M Doll; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Sarah E Rutstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Occult Malignancy Rate of 1498 Hysterectomies or Myomectomies with Morcellation: A Retrospective Single-Arm Study.

Authors:  Garri Tchartchian; Bernd Bojahr; Sven Becker; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Vasilis Tanos; Hugo C Verhoeven; Markus Wallwiener; Rudy L De Wilde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2018-12-04

4.  Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy with In-Bag Morcellation in Very Large Uterus.

Authors:  Harald Krentel; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2017-10-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.