Literature DB >> 11425832

Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach.

J Mäkinen1, J Johansson, C Tomás, E Tomás, P K Heinonen, T Laatikainen, M Kauko, A M Heikkinen, J Sjöberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the late 1980s, the option of laparoscopic hysterectomy has raised questions about the most suitable approach to hysterectomy.
METHODS: To evaluate the influence of the type of approach, in causing or avoiding certain complaints in hysterectomies a prospective nationwide study was conducted comprising all hysterectomies for benign disease performed in Finland during 1996. The primary outcomes of interest were the operation-related morbidity, common surgical details and post-operative complications.
RESULTS: A total of 10 110 hysterectomies, including 5875 abdominal, 1801 vaginal and 2434 laparoscopic operations showed a low rate of overall complications, 17.2, 23.3 and 19.0% respectively. Infections were the most common complications with incidences of 10.5, 13.0 and 9.0% in the abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic group respectively. The most severe type of haemorrhagic events occurred in 2.1, 3.1 and 2.7% in the abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic group respectively. Ureter injuries were predominant in laparoscopic group [relative risk (RR) 7.2 compared with abdominal] whereas bowel injuries were most common in vaginal group (RR 2.5 compared with abdominal). Surgeons who had performed >30 laparoscopic hysterectomies had a significantly lower incidence of ureter and bladder injuries (0.5 and 0.8% respectively) than those who had performed < or =30 operations (2.2 and 2.0% respectively). A decreasing trend of bowel complications was also seen with increasing experience in vaginal hysterectomies.
CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale observational study on hysterectomies provides novel information on operation-related morbidity of abdominal, vaginal or laparoscopic approach. The results support the importance of the experience of the surgeon in reducing severe complications, especially in laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11425832     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.7.1473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  60 in total

1.  Single-port laparoscopic surgery is applicable to most gynecologic surgery: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Maria Lee; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Ga Won Yim; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Managing novel orally administered anticoagulants in patients undergoing urogynaecological surgery.

Authors:  Claire M McCarthy; Orfhlaith E O'Sullivan; Barry A O'Reilly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Are perioperative bundles associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in women undergoing benign hysterectomy? Retrospective cohort analysis of 16,286 cases in Michigan.

Authors:  John A Harris; Anne G Sammarco; Carolyn W Swenson; Shitanshu Uppal; Neil Kamdar; Darrel Campbell; Sarah Evilsizer; John O DeLancey; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Robotically assisted hysterectomy: 100 cases after the learning curve.

Authors:  Thomas N Payne; Francis R Dauterive
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-03-18

Review 5.  Uterine fibroid embolization: CME update for family physicians.

Authors:  Antony Raikhlin; Mark Otto Baerlocher; Murray R Asch
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Patient radiation exposure in uterine artery embolization of leiomyomata: calculation of organ doses and effective dose.

Authors:  S Vetter; F W Schultz; E-P Strecker; J Zoetelief
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Women's preference for laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Kirsten B Kluivers; Brent C Opmeer; Peggy M Geomini; Marlies Y Bongers; Mark E Vierhout; Gérard L Bremer; Ben W J Mol
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2008-12-16

8.  Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy versus laparoscopic total hysterectomy: a decade of experience.

Authors:  J S van Evert; J M J Smeenk; F P H L J Dijkhuizen; J H de Kruif; K B Kluivers
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2009-11-14

9.  Twenty-first century laparoscopic hysterectomy: should we not leave the vaginal step out?

Authors:  A R H Twijnstra; N A Kianmanesh Rad; M J G H Smeets; J F Admiraal; F W Jansen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2009-03-21

10.  Improvement of endometrial biopsy over transvaginal ultrasound alone for endometrial surveillance in women with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Lotte H M Gerritzen; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Angèle L M Oei; Fokko M Nagengast; Maaike A P C van Ham; Leon F A G Massuger; Joanne A de Hullu
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.