Literature DB >> 25240530

In vivo porcine training model for cranial neurosurgery.

Jan Regelsberger1, Sven Eicker, Ioannis Siasios, Daniel Hänggi, Matthias Kirsch, Peter Horn, Peter Winkler, Stefano Signoretti, Kostas Fountas, Henry Dufour, Juan A Barcia, Oliver Sakowitz, Thomas Westermaier, Michael Sabel, Oliver Heese.   

Abstract

Supplemental education is desirable for neurosurgical training, and the use of human cadaver specimen and virtual reality models is routine. An in vivo porcine training model for cranial neurosurgery was introduced in 2005, and our recent experience with this unique model is outlined here. For the first time, porcine anatomy is illustrated with particular respect to neurosurgical procedures. The pros and cons of this model are described. The aim of the course was to set up a laboratory scenery imitating an almost realistic operating room in which anatomy of the brain and neurosurgical techniques in a mentored environment free from time constraints could be trained. Learning objectives of the course were to learn about the microsurgical techniques in cranial neurosurgery and the management of complications. Participants were asked to evaluate the quality and utility of the programme via standardized questionnaires by a grading scale from A (best) to E (worst). In total, 154 residents have been trained on the porcine model to date. None of the participants regarded his own residency programme as structured. The bleeding and complication management (97%), the realistic laboratory set-up (89%) and the working environment (94%) were favoured by the vast majority of trainees and confirmed our previous findings. After finishing the course, the participants graded that their skills in bone drilling, dissecting the brain and preserving cerebral vessels under microscopic magnification had improved to level A and B. In vivo hands-on courses, fully equipped with microsurgical instruments, offer an outstanding training opportunity in which bleeding management on a pulsating, vital brain represents a unique training approach. Our results have shown that education programmes still lack practical training facilities in which in vivo models may act as a complementary approach in surgical training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25240530     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-014-0572-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  8 in total

1.  Training microneurosurgery - four years experiences with an in vivo model.

Authors:  J Regelsberger; O Heese; P Horn; M Kirsch; S Eicker; M Sabel; M Westphal
Journal:  Cent Eur Neurosurg       Date:  2010-07-15

2.  Training in surgical oncology - the role of VR simulation.

Authors:  T M Lewis; R Aggarwal; N Rajaretnam; T P Grantcharov; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.279

3.  Comparison of different microanastomosis training models : model accuracy and practicality.

Authors:  Gyojun Hwang; Chang Wan Oh; Sukh Que Park; Seung Hun Sheen; Jae Seung Bang; Hyun-Seung Kang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-04-30

4.  Training models for vascular microneurosurgery.

Authors:  Uwe Spetzger; Andrej von Schilling; Till Brombach; Gerd Winkler
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2011

5.  Microsurgical cerebral aneurysm training porcine model.

Authors:  Jon Olabe; Javier Olabe; Jose Roda
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Role of cranial and spinal virtual and augmented reality simulation using immersive touch modules in neurosurgical training.

Authors:  Ali Alaraj; Fady T Charbel; Daniel Birk; Matthew Tobin; Mathew Tobin; Cristian Luciano; Pat P Banerjee; Silvio Rizzi; Jeff Sorenson; Kevin Foley; Konstantin Slavin; Ben Roitberg
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Microsurgical training on an in vitro chicken wing infusion model.

Authors:  Jon Olabe; Javier Olabe
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2009-03-29

Review 8.  Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Rajesh Aggarwal; Latha Palanivelu; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Restricted working hours in Austrian residency programs : Survey results.

Authors:  Konstantin D Bergmeister; Martin Aman; Bruno K Podesser
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Pig as a large animal model for posterior fossa surgery in oto-neurosurgery: A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mohamed Elsayed; Renato Torres; Olivier Sterkers; Daniele Bernardeschi; Yann Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Simulation for skills training in neurosurgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and analysis of progressive scholarly acceptance.

Authors:  Joseph Davids; Susruta Manivannan; Ara Darzi; Stamatia Giannarou; Hutan Ashrafian; Hani J Marcus
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Simulation training in neurosurgery: advances in education and practice.

Authors:  Sanjay Konakondla; Reginald Fong; Clemens M Schirmer
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2017-07-14

5.  Simulating Surgical Skills in Animals: Systematic Review, Costs & Acceptance Analyses.

Authors:  Konstantin D Bergmeister; Martin Aman; Anne Kramer; Thilo L Schenck; Otto Riedl; Simeon C Daeschler; Oskar C Aszmann; Helga Bergmeister; Mohammad Golriz; Arianeb Mehrabi; Gabriel Hundeshagen; Perenlei Enkhbaatar; Michael P Kinsky; Bruno K Podesser
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-09-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.