Literature DB >> 32379527

Clinical Application of Spectral Modulation Detection: Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid.

David M Kessler1, Jace Wolfe2, Michelle Blanchard3, René H Gifford1,4.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between speech recognition benefit derived from the addition of a hearing aid (HA) to the nonimplanted ear (i.e., bimodal benefit) and spectral modulation detection (SMD) performance in the nonimplanted ear in a large clinical sample. An additional purpose was to investigate the influence of low-frequency pure-tone average (PTA) of the nonimplanted ear and age at implantation on the variance in bimodal benefit. Method Participants included 311 unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users who wore an HA in the nonimplanted ear. Participants completed speech recognition testing in quiet and in noise with the CI-alone and in the bimodal condition (i.e., CI and contralateral HA) and SMD in the nonimplanted ear. Results SMD performance in the nonimplanted ear was significantly correlated with bimodal benefit in quiet and in noise. However, this relationship was much weaker than previous reports with smaller samples. SMD, low-frequency PTA of the nonimplanted ear from 125 to 750 Hz, and age at implantation together accounted for, at most, 19.1% of the variance in bimodal benefit. Conclusions Taken together, SMD, low-frequency PTA, and age at implantation account for the greatest amount of variance in bimodal benefit than each variable alone. A large portion of variance (~80%) in bimodal benefit is not explained by these variables. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12185493.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32379527      PMCID: PMC7842114          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  35 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Current research with cochlear implants at Arizona State University.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Anthony Spahr; Rene H Gifford; Sarah Cook; Ting Zhang; Louise Loiselle; William Yost; Lara Cardy; JoAnne Whittingham; David Schramm
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment.

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; Graham Naylor; Claus Elberling
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity.

Authors:  Catharina Foo; Mary Rudner; Jerker Rönnberg; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Han-Gyol Yi; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Working memory, age, and hearing loss: susceptibility to hearing aid distortion.

Authors:  Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela Souza; Rosalinda Baca; James M Kates
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Marlan R Hansen; Christopher W Turner; Jacob J Oleson; Lina A Reiss; Aaron J Parkinson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants or Bimodal Hearing for Children with Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  René H Gifford
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2020-10-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.