Alexis Valentín-Vargas1, Robert A Root2, Julia W Neilson3, Jon Chorover4, Raina M Maier5. 1. Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, 429 Shantz Bldg. #38, 1177 E. Fourth Street, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0038, USA. Electronic address: valentin@email.arizona.edu. 2. Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, 429 Shantz Bldg. #38, 1177 E. Fourth Street, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0038, USA. Electronic address: rroot@email.arizona.edu. 3. Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, 429 Shantz Bldg. #38, 1177 E. Fourth Street, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0038, USA. Electronic address: jneilson@email.arizona.edu. 4. Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, 429 Shantz Bldg. #38, 1177 E. Fourth Street, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0038, USA. Electronic address: chorover@cals.arizona.edu. 5. Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, 429 Shantz Bldg. #38, 1177 E. Fourth Street, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0038, USA. Electronic address: rmaier@ag.arizona.edu.
Abstract
Compost-assisted phytostabilization has recently emerged as a robust alternative for reclamation of metalliferous mine tailings. Previous studies suggest that root-associated microbes may be important for facilitating plant establishment on the tailings, yet little is known about the long-term dynamics of microbial communities during reclamation. A mechanistic understanding of microbial community dynamics in tailings ecosystems undergoing remediation is critical because these dynamics profoundly influence both the biogeochemical weathering of tailings and the sustainability of a plant cover. Here we monitor the dynamics of soil microbial communities (i.e. bacteria, fungi, archaea) during a 12-month mesocosm study that included 4 treatments: 2 unplanted controls (unamended and compost-amended tailings) and 2 compost-amended seeded tailings treatments. Bacterial, fungal and archaeal communities responded distinctively to the revegetation process and concurrent changes in environmental conditions and pore water chemistry. Compost addition significantly increased microbial diversity and had an immediate and relatively long-lasting buffering-effect on pH, allowing plants to germinate and thrive during the early stages of the experiment. However, the compost buffering capacity diminished after six months and acidification took over as the major factor affecting plant survival and microbial community structure. Immediate changes in bacterial communities were observed following plant establishment, whereas fungal communities showed a delayed response that apparently correlated with the pH decline. Fluctuations in cobalt pore water concentrations, in particular, had a significant effect on the structure of all three microbial groups, which may be linked to the role of cobalt in metal detoxification pathways. The present study represents, to our knowledge, the first documentation of the dynamics of the three major microbial groups during revegetation of compost-amended, metalliferous mine tailings.
Compost-n class="Chemical">assisted phytostabilization has recently emerged as a robust alternative for reclamation of metalliferous mine tailings. Previous studies suggest that root-associated microbes may be important for facilitating plant establishment on the tailings, yet little is known about the long-term dynamics of microbialcommunities during reclamation. A mechanistic understanding of microbialcommunity dynamics in tailings ecosystems undergoing remediation is critical because these dynamics profoundly influence both the biogeochemical weathering of tailings and the sustainability of a plant cover. Here we monitor the dynamics of soil microbialcommunities (i.e. bacteria, fungi, archaea) during a 12-month mesocosm study that included 4 treatments: 2 unplanted controls (unamended and compost-amended tailings) and 2 compost-amended seeded tailings treatments. Bacterial, fungal and archaealcommunities responded distinctively to the revegetation process and concurrent changes in environmentalconditions and pore water chemistry. Compost addition significantly increased microbial diversity and had an immediate and relatively long-lasting buffering-effect on pH, allowing plants to germinate and thrive during the early stages of the experiment. However, the compost buffering capacity diminished after six months and acidification took over as the major factor affecting plant survival and microbialcommunity structure. Immediate changes in bacterialcommunities were observed following plant establishment, whereas fungalcommunities showed a delayed response that apparently correlated with the pH decline. Fluctuations in cobalt pore waterconcentrations, in particular, had a significant effect on the structure of all three microbial groups, which may be linked to the role of cobalt in metal detoxification pathways. The present study represents, to our knowledge, the first documentation of the dynamics of the three major microbial groups during revegetation of compost-amended, metalliferous mine tailings.
Authors: Emilio O Casamayor; Ramon Massana; Susana Benlloch; Lise Øvreås; Beatriz Díez; Victoria J Goddard; Josep M Gasol; Ian Joint; Francisco Rodríguez-Valera; Carlos Pedrós-Alió Journal: Environ Microbiol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 5.491
Authors: Fernando A Solís-Dominguez; Scott A White; Travis Borrillo Hutter; Mary Kay Amistadi; Robert A Root; Jon Chorover; Raina M Maier Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Alexis Valentín-Vargas; Julia W Neilson; Robert A Root; Jon Chorover; Raina M Maier Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2017-11-10 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Linnea K Honeker; Julia W Neilson; Robert A Root; Juliana Gil-Loaiza; Jon Chorover; Raina M Maier Journal: Microb Ecol Date: 2017-06-02 Impact factor: 4.552
Authors: Juliana Gil-Loaiza; Scott A White; Robert A Root; Fernando A Solís-Dominguez; Corin M Hammond; Jon Chorover; Raina M Maier Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Lucia Rodriguez-Freire; Sarah E Moore; Reyes Sierra-Alvarez; Robert A Root; Jon Chorover; James A Field Journal: Biotechnol Bioeng Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Kathryn M Docherty; Hannah M Borton; Noelle Espinosa; Martha Gebhardt; Juliana Gil-Loaiza; Jessica L M Gutknecht; Patrick W Maes; Brendon M Mott; John Jacob Parnell; Gayle Purdy; Pedro A P Rodrigues; Lee F Stanish; Olivia N Walser; Rachel E Gallery Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Danielle J Carlin; Marisa F Naujokas; Karen D Bradham; John Cowden; Michelle Heacock; Heather F Henry; Janice S Lee; David J Thomas; Claudia Thompson; Erik J Tokar; Michael P Waalkes; Linda S Birnbaum; William A Suk Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 9.031