Literature DB >> 17220518

A complex relationship among chemical concentration, detection threshold, and suprathreshold intensity of bitter compounds.

Russell S J Keast1, Jessica Roper.   

Abstract

Detection thresholds and psychophysical curves were established for caffeine, quinine-HCl (QHCl), and propylthiouracil (PROP) in a sample of 33 subjects (28 female mean age 24 +/- 4). The mean detection threshold (+/-standard error) for caffeine, QHCl, and PROP was 1.2 +/- 0.12, 0.0083 +/- 0.001, and 0.088 +/- 0.07 mM, respectively. Pearson product-moment analysis revealed no significant correlations between detection thresholds of the compounds. Psychophysical curves were constructed for each bitter compound over 6 concentrations. There were significant correlations between incremental points of the individual psychophysical curves for QHCl and PROP. Regarding caffeine, there was a specific concentration (6 mM) below and above which the incremental steps in bitterness were correlated. Between compounds, analysis of psychophysical curves revealed no correlations with PROP, but there were significant correlations between the bitterness of caffeine and QHCl at higher concentrations on the psychophysical curve (P<0.05). Correlation analysis of detection threshold and suprathreshold intensity within a compound revealed a significant correlation between PROP threshold and suprathreshold intensity (r=0.46-0.4, P<0.05), a significant negative correlation for QHCl (r=-0.33 to -0.4, P<0.05), and no correlation for caffeine. The results suggest a complex relationship between chemical concentration, detection threshold, and suprathreshold intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17220518     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjl052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  39 in total

1.  Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Margaret R Wallace; Valerie S Knopik; Deborah M Herbstman; Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Changes in taste and food preferences in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yeon-Hee Kim; Gun Min Kim; Sungtaek Son; Mina Song; Sangun Park; Hyun Cheol Chung; Seung-Min Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  A matter of taste: making the distinction between taste and flavor is essential for improving management of dysgeusia.

Authors:  Anna Boltong; Russell Spencer John Keast; Sanchia Kaye Aranda
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Mouth rinsing and ingestion of a bitter-tasting solution increases corticomotor excitability in male competitive cyclists.

Authors:  Sharon Gam; Kym J Guelfi; Geoff Hammond; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Proceedings from the 2018 Association for Chemoreception Annual Meeting Symposium: Bariatric Surgery and Its Effects on Taste and Food Selection.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Natasha Kapoor; Ruth K Price; M Yanina Pepino; M Barbara E Livingstone; Carel W Le Roux
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Regional differences in suprathreshold intensity for bitter and umami stimuli.

Authors:  Emma L Feeney; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  Measures of individual differences in taste and creaminess perception.

Authors:  Juyun Lim; Lenka Urban; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Reliability of Threshold and Suprathreshold Methods for Taste Phenotyping: Characterization with PROP and Sodium Chloride.

Authors:  Veronica Galindo-Cuspinera; Thierry Waeber; Nicolas Antille; Christoph Hartmann; Nicola Stead; Nathalie Martin
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.833

9.  Resynthesis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate mediates adaptation of the caffeine response in rat taste receptor cells.

Authors:  Fang-Li Zhao; Scott Herness
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Genetic and molecular basis of individual differences in human umami taste perception.

Authors:  Noriatsu Shigemura; Shinya Shirosaki; Keisuke Sanematsu; Ryusuke Yoshida; Yuzo Ninomiya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.