Literature DB >> 7828984

Diagnostic yield and management benefit of laparoscopy: a prospective audit.

G C Vander Velpen1, S M Shimi, A Cuschieri.   

Abstract

A prospective audit of the diagnostic yield and management benefit of laparoscopy was undertaken in 220 consecutive patients. The procedure was performed electively in 180 patients and as an emergency in 40. The indications for laparoscopy in the elective group were suspected hepatic disease, staging of intra-abdominal malignancy, diagnostic problems, and chronic abdominal pain. Emergency laparoscopy was performed in patients admitted with acute abdominal pain. Diagnostic benefit varied with the indication for the procedure: liver disease 71%, tumour staging 87%, uncertain diagnosis 74%, acute abdominal pain 100%, and chronic abdominal pain 41%. Clinical management was significantly influenced by laparoscopy in 15 of 21 (71%) patients with liver disease, 10 of 30 (33%) with intra-abdominal malignancy, 5 of 19 (26%) with uncertain diagnosis, 32 of 40 (80%) with acute abdominal pain, and 15 of 110 (23%) patients with chronic abdominal pain. A wrong assessment of the nature or stage of the disease was made by laparoscopy in 3 of 220 (1.0%). There was no morbidity or mortality attributed to laparoscopy in the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7828984      PMCID: PMC1375623          DOI: 10.1136/gut.35.11.1617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  27 in total

1.  Value of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; A W Hall; J Clark
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of CT in circumscript liver disease.

Authors:  U Scherer; R Rothe; J Eisenburg; F Schildberg; P Meister; J Lissner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with suspected carcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  P F Sheedy; D H Stephens; R R Hattery; R L MacCarty
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Definitive role of CT scanning of the pancreas. The second year's experience.

Authors:  J R Haaga; R J Alfidi; T R Havrilla; R Tubbs; L Gonzalez; T F Meaney; M A Corsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Peritoneoscopy in the staging of Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  V T DeVita; C M Bagley; B Goodell; D A O'Kieffe; N P Trujillo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Appendicitis. A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases.

Authors:  F R Lewis; J W Holcroft; J Boey; E Dunphy
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1975-05

7.  Laparoscopic observation and biopsy of the pancrease.

Authors:  H Ishida; Y Furukawa; H Kuroda; M Kobayashi; K Tsuneoka
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Sampling variability on percutaneous liver biopsy.

Authors:  W Abdi; J C Millan; E Mezey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1979-06

9.  Laparoscopic assessment of the jaundiced patient: a review of 53 patients.

Authors:  A D Irving; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Laparoscopy in general surgery.

Authors:  A Lewis; T J Archer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic laparoscopy for the acute abdomen and trauma.

Authors:  W Majewski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Routine diagnostic laparoscopy reduces the rate of unnecessary appendicectomies in young women.

Authors:  S Garbarino; S M Shimi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Routine ultrasound and limited computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Boudewijn R Toorenvliet; Fraukje Wiersma; Rutger F R Bakker; Jos W S Merkus; Paul J Breslau; Jaap F Hamming
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Abdominal adhesions: A practical review of an often overlooked entity.

Authors:  N Tabibian; E Swehli; A Boyd; A Umbreen; J H Tabibian
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-31

5.  Standard outpatient re-evaluation for patients not admitted to the hospital after emergency department evaluation for acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  Boudewijn R Toorenvliet; Rutger F R Bakker; Hans C Flu; Jos W S Merkus; Jaap F Hamming; Paul J Breslau
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.352

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.